Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ArtemioPadilla/agent-triforce --skill visual-companiongit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ArtemioPadilla/agent-triforceWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/artemiopadilla/agent-triforce/visual-companion)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/artemiopadilla/agent-triforce/visual-companion"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/artemiopadilla/agent-triforce/visual-companion/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/artemiopadilla/agent-triforce/visual-companion"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/artemiopadilla/agent-triforce/visual-companion.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00046 | $0.00598 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00239 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00120 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00060 |
Grade A, and why
visual-companion scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 73 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Visual Brainstorming Companion
A browser-based tool for visual design work during: $ARGUMENTS
Availability Check
Before offering the companion, check if browser tools are available:
- If
mcp__claude-in-chrome__*tools are accessible: companion is available - If not: proceed text-only, do not offer the companion, this is not an error
Consent Flow
Offer once per session, in its own message (no other content):
Some of what we're working on might be easier to explain if I can show it to you in a web browser. I can put together mockups, diagrams, comparisons, and other visuals as we go. Want to try it?
Wait for response. If declined, proceed text-only.
Per-Question Decision Rule
Even after acceptance, decide FOR EACH QUESTION whether to use browser or terminal:
Use the browser when the user would understand better by SEEING it:
- Mockups and wireframes
- Layout comparisons (side-by-side)
- Architecture diagrams (boxes and arrows)
- Data flow visualizations
- State machine diagrams
- Color/typography comparisons
Use the terminal when the content is fundamentally TEXT:
- Requirements questions
- Conceptual choices
- Tradeoff lists
- Scope decisions
- Technical constraints
- A/B/C option descriptions
A question about a UI topic is not automatically visual. "What does personality mean here?" is terminal. "Which layout works better?" is browser.
Rendering Guidelines
When rendering in the browser:
- Create a new tab with
mcp__claude-in-chrome__tabs_create_mcp - Use
mcp__claude-in-chrome__navigateto load an HTML data URI or local file - Render with:
- Tailwind CSS for styling (via CDN)
- Clean, semantic HTML
- Dark/light mode support
- Responsive layout
What to Render
- Architecture diagrams: HTML/CSS boxes with flexbox/grid, connecting lines
- UI mockups: Tailwind-styled components at realistic sizes
- Comparisons: Split-pane layouts, side-by-side options with labels
- Data flows: Labeled boxes with directional arrows
- State machines: Node-edge diagrams with transition labels
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 73 lines · 46 tokens per session scan A 1784f0273897
visual-companion is a skill published in the GitHub repository ArtemioPadilla/agent-triforce (3 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 46 tokens to every session and 598 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
review-all
Multi-agent code review for diffs (project-agnostic). Covers standards, bugs, security, DRY, smells, perf, tests, API contracts, a11y/i18n. Verifies each finding to eliminate false positives. Use for /review-all, pre-PR/pre-commit review, or auditing uncommitted/staged changes.
aesthetic-instrument
A committed aesthetic in the sense of skills/committed-aesthetic/SKILL.md: every rule below is checkable, and every value was read out of the source — packages/board/public/index.html and greatcto-site/styles.css — rather than chosen to write this document.
committed-aesthetic
How to write — and how to use — a skill that IS one aesthetic rather than a catalogue of them. A catalogue lets an agent pick, and it picks the modal option; a committed aesthetic makes it execute one thing precisely, against rules you can check. Use when a design keeps coming out competent and forgettable, when…
eval-ui-ux
Specialized UI/UX evaluator for the Evaluate-Loop. Use this for evaluating UI shell tracks, design system tracks, screen implementation tracks, or any track where the primary deliverable is visual/interactive UI. Checks design system adherence, visual consistency, layout structure, responsive behavior, component…
improve-retention
Diagnose and fix retention problems using behavior design (B=MAP). Use when the user mentions "users drop off", "activation rate", "onboarding friction", "retention metrics", "why users dont complete", "churn analysis", "user activation", or "aha moment". Also trigger when analyzing cohort retention curves, designing…
ai-ux-patterns
The UX patterns that don't exist in deterministic software — confidence display, graceful failure, reversibility, human-in-the-loop, and progressive disclosure — for designing trustworthy probabilistic features. Grounded in Google PAIR (People + AI Guidebook) and Apple HIG for ML. Turns "how should the AI feature…