Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Artexis10/exomem --skill exomem-recordsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Artexis10/exomemWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/artexis10/exomem/exomem-records)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/artexis10/exomem/exomem-records"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/artexis10/exomem/exomem-records/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/artexis10/exomem/exomem-records"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/artexis10/exomem/exomem-records.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00016 | $0.00119 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00060 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00024 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00012 |
Grade A, and why
exomem-records scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
Licensed AGPL-3.0
The repository is licensed AGPL-3.0, which this catalogue does not treat as permission to reproduce the file. Read it at the source.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 14 lines · 16 tokens per session scan A 021b7697c184
exomem-records is a skill published in the GitHub repository Artexis10/exomem (10 stars, last pushed today), licensed AGPL-3.0. It adds 16 tokens to every session and 119 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
kb
Set up, evolve, or operate a hraness/kb local-first Markdown knowledge base for coding-agent memory. Use when a user asks to design KB conventions or a recurring KB ritual; search or query a KB or Obsidian vault; load or recover repository context, plans, decisions, concepts, backlinks, semantic search, or Git…
mnemonic
Search local indexed markdown knowledge bases. Use when the user asks to find notes, dig up a concept from personal docs, cross-reference ideas across wikis, or answer from indexed local files. Triggers on "look up in notes", "search my docs", "what did I write about", "find in my vault", "check my index", "retrieve…
llm-wiki
Build and maintain a persistent, interlinked Obsidian-compatible markdown wiki using Karpathy's LLM Wiki pattern. Extension-backed with auto-generated metadata, guardrails, and 14 custom tools (+3 opt-in agent-trajectory tools).
link-memory
Use after important user-approved decisions, when durable context should be proposed or reviewed, and for explicit Link memory lifecycle work: remember, recall, review, update, archive, restore, forget, or explain local memories through the CLI without requiring MCP.
link-retrieve
Use before answering work that may depend on user memory, project history, source-backed notes, or prior decisions; retrieve compact Link context through the CLI without loading the whole wiki or requiring MCP.
link-ingest
Use when raw files are present, source pages look stale, or a user asks to ingest notes into Link; refresh source-backed wiki pages, propose memories, and validate updates through the CLI without MCP.