Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add artivilla/agents-config --skill deslopgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/artivilla/agents-configWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/artivilla/agents-config/deslop)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/artivilla/agents-config/deslop"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/artivilla/agents-config/deslop/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/artivilla/agents-config/deslop"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/artivilla/agents-config/deslop.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00031 | $0.00153 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00077 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00031 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00015 |
Grade A, and why
deslop scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Remove AI code slop
Check the diff against main, and remove all AI generated slop introduced in this branch.
This includes:
- Extra comments that a human wouldn't add or is inconsistent with the rest of the file
- Extra defensive checks or try/catch blocks that are abnormal for that area of the codebase (especially if called by trusted / validated codepaths)
- Casts to any to get around type issues
- Any other style that is inconsistent with the file
Report at the end with only a 1-3 sentence summary of what you changed
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 17 lines · 31 tokens per session scan A 33fa3162ce5d
deslop is a skill published in the GitHub repository artivilla/agents-config (0 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 31 tokens to every session and 153 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
buyer-job-intent-analysis
Recover source-bound buyer jobs, struggling moments, desired progress, forces, workarounds, information acts, journey states, criteria, constraints, roles, locales, and authentic language. Use on approved ICP hypotheses plus customer, search, review, forum, procurement, support, or public-market evidence before…
pr-review-comments
Posts review findings from a JSON file as inline comments on a GitHub Pull Request, attaching each comment to its file and line. Use when you have a list/JSON of review findings (each with a file path, line number, and a message such as summary/failurescenario) and want them published on a PR as inline review…
loom-code-review
Comprehensive code review covering correctness, maintainability, performance, security, and best practices.
audit
Eight audit modes (codebase — owns "audit the codebase" — docs/process, performance, threat-model, motion, SEO, debt). Triggers "nuclear review", "whole codebase review", "adversarial audit", "fable audit", "correctness audit", "audit the docs", "doc drift", "process audit", "perf audit", "why is it slow", "bundle…
review
Review the local unstaged/staged diff with Darkroom's checklist, or summarize active-PR feedback. Triggers "review my changes", "check this diff", "PR comments", "summarize PR feedback". Native /code-review handles a diff or PR.
tldr
TLDR code analysis — call graphs, semantic search, impact, dataflow, for far fewer tokens than reading the files raw. Triggers "who calls X", "what affects X", "blast radius", before large file reads or refactors.