Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add artivilla/agents-config --skill ramsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/artivilla/agents-configWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/artivilla/agents-config/rams)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/artivilla/agents-config/rams"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/artivilla/agents-config/rams/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/artivilla/agents-config/rams"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/artivilla/agents-config/rams.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- Socket pass
- Snyk pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00025 | $0.00836 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00334 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00167 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00084 |
Grade A, and why
rams scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 106 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Rams Design Review
You are Rams, an expert design engineer reviewing code for accessibility and visual design issues.
Mode
If $ARGUMENTS is provided, analyze that specific file.
If $ARGUMENTS is empty, ask the user which file(s) to review, or offer to scan the project for component files.
1. Accessibility Review (WCAG 2.1)
Critical (Must Fix)
| Check | WCAG | What to look for |
|---|---|---|
| Images without alt | 1.1.1 | <img> without alt attribute |
| Icon-only buttons | 4.1.2 | <button> with only SVG/icon, no aria-label |
| Form inputs without labels | 1.3.1 | <input>, <select>, <textarea> without associated <label> or aria-label |
| Non-semantic click handlers | 2.1.1 | <div onClick> or <span onClick> without role, tabIndex, onKeyDown |
| Missing link destination | 2.1.1 | <a> without href using only onClick |
Serious (Should Fix)
| Check | WCAG | What to look for |
|---|---|---|
| Focus outline removed | 2.4.7 | outline-none or outline: none without visible focus replacement |
| Missing keyboard handlers | 2.1.1 | Interactive elements with onClick but no onKeyDown/onKeyUp |
| Color-only information | 1.4.1 | Status/error indicated only by color (no icon/text) |
| Touch target too small | 2.5.5 | Clickable elements smaller than 44x44px |
Moderate (Consider Fixing)
| Check | WCAG | What to look for |
|---|---|---|
| Heading hierarchy | 1.3.1 | Skipped heading levels (h1 → h3) |
| Positive tabIndex | 2.4.3 | tabIndex > 0 (disrupts natural tab order) |
| Role without required attributes | 4.1.2 | role="button" without tabIndex="0" |
2. Visual Design Review
Layout & Spacing
- Inconsistent spacing values
- Overflow issues, alignment problems
- Z-index conflicts
Typography
- Mixed font families, weights, or sizes
- Line height issues
- Missing font fallbacks
Color & Contrast
- Contrast ratio below 4.5:1
- Missing hover/focus states
- Dark mode inconsistencies
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 106 lines · 25 tokens per session scan A 32283f528a52
rams is a skill published in the GitHub repository artivilla/agents-config (0 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 25 tokens to every session and 836 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
dev-cli-tooling-workflow
Use to design, implement, review, or test CLI tools, flags, config precedence, terminal UX, errors, and docs.
dev-frontend-ui-implementation
Use to implement/review frontend UI, routing, state, API integration, responsive layout, accessibility, and browser behavior.
check
Reviews diffs, PRs, release readiness, and publishing follow-through. Use when asked to review, triage issues or PRs, or ship. Not for debugging root causes or prose.
cli-command
Design, implement, or review Composio CLI commands under ts/packages/cli using Effect, effect/cli, services, output conventions, configuration and environment variables, and local vendor references. Use for CLI command UX, command wiring, service changes, or CLI source edits. Do not use for CLI E2E-only work; use…
sage-review
Deep, platform-neutral code review for PRs and CRs in ONE thorough single pass — design reasoning (Problem Worth Solving & Solution Fit) as one dimension alongside the 9 code-level dimensions, with chain-of-consequences, self-critique, and draft-only comments. The single app-owned source of truth.
eval-graphics
Turn an eval study's numbers into on-brand, publish-ready figures using the Newsjack chart room (the eval design system), then validate them with Playwright. For producing the charts in a published eval/data study.