Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Asaiuta/reverse-workbench-skill --skill competition-ad-certificate-abusegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Asaiuta/reverse-workbench-skillWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/asaiuta/reverse-workbench-skill/competition-ad-certificate-abuse)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/asaiuta/reverse-workbench-skill/competition-ad-certificate-abuse"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/asaiuta/reverse-workbench-skill/competition-ad-certificate-abuse/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/asaiuta/reverse-workbench-skill/competition-ad-certificate-abuse"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/asaiuta/reverse-workbench-skill/competition-ad-certificate-abuse.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00118 | $0.00673 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00059 | $0.00336 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00024 | $0.00135 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00067 |
Grade A, and why
competition-ad-certificate-abuse scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to competition-ad-certificate-abuse — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 51 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Competition AD Certificate Abuse
Use this skill only as a downstream specialization after $ctf-sandbox-orchestrator is already active and has established sandbox assumptions, node ownership, and evidence priorities. If that has not happened yet, return to $ctf-sandbox-orchestrator first.
Use this skill when the decisive identity edge is certificate-based and the hard part is proving how a template or CA policy turns into accepted privilege.
Reply in Simplified Chinese unless the user explicitly requests English.
Quick Start
- Identify the CA, template, enrolling principal, and accepting service before diving into every certificate detail.
- Separate template enrollability from cert-based authentication or privilege acceptance.
- Record EKUs, subject or SAN controls, issuance requirements, enrollment rights, and mapping behavior in compact blocks.
- Tie the issued cert to one accepted path: PKINIT, Schannel, LDAPS, WinRM, or another mapped service.
- Reproduce the smallest certificate issuance-to-acceptance chain that yields the decisive privilege.
Workflow
1. Map CA And Template Trust
- Record CA configuration, template name, enrollment permissions, manager approval, authorized signatures, EKUs, subject requirements, and SAN behavior.
- Note whether the path depends on alternate subject names,
UPN, DNS names, enrollment agent behavior, or template supersedence. - Keep principal, template, and issuance policy tied together.
2. Prove Cert-To-Privilege Acceptance
- Show how the issued certificate is mapped or accepted: PKINIT, smartcard logon, Schannel auth, service mapping, or explicit certificate mapping.
- Record serial, subject, SAN, EKU, validity, and the exact service or domain edge that accepts it.
- Distinguish certificate issuance from the separate step where privilege is actually granted.
3. Reduce To The Decisive Abuse Chain
- Compress the path to the smallest sequence: enrollment right or misconfig -> issued cert -> accepted mapping -> resulting privilege.
- State clearly whether the weakness lives in template config, CA policy, mapping logic, relay path, or enrollment rights.
- If the task is really about delegation or ticket transformation after PKINIT, switch back to the tighter Kerberos skill.
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 51 lines · 118 tokens per session scan A acb228fae7ec
competition-ad-certificate-abuse is a skill published in the GitHub repository Asaiuta/reverse-workbench-skill (2 stars, last pushed 27d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 118 tokens to every session and 673 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to competition-ad-certificate-abuse, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
osint-recon
A knowledge guide for open-source intelligence, or OSINT: collecting information from publicly available sources. It covers servers, websites, domains, and, when appropriate, people.
crypto-toolkit
A toolkit for encoding, decoding, hashing, and encrypting data in formats such as Base64, hexadecimal, URLs, JWTs, AES, RSA, and common ciphers.
hackerone
A safety wrapper for HackerOne bug-bounty testing that reads a program's allowed targets and rules before handing each allowed asset to a penetration-testing workflow. HackerOne is a platform where companies invite researchers to report security bugs.
redteam-cve-lookup
CVE lookup and applicability assessment domain card. Use after reconnaissance has identified products, versions, services, or fingerprints and red-team mode needs evidence-based CVE matching before deeper testing.
redteam-cve-validation
CVE validation domain card. Use after CVE lookup has produced applicable or candidate CVEs and red-team mode needs scoped evidence to decide whether to continue, pivot, or report.
secknowledge-skill
A knowledge base for testing the security of websites, software, and AI systems, including agents and language models.