Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Asaiuta/reverse-workbench-skill --skill malware-analysisgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Asaiuta/reverse-workbench-skillWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/asaiuta/reverse-workbench-skill/malware-analysis)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/asaiuta/reverse-workbench-skill/malware-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/asaiuta/reverse-workbench-skill/malware-analysis/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/asaiuta/reverse-workbench-skill/malware-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/asaiuta/reverse-workbench-skill/malware-analysis.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00036 | $0.02334 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00018 | $0.01167 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00467 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00233 |
Grade A, and why
malware-analysis scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- malware-analysis — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 227 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Malware Analysis
ACTION REQUIRED(读完后立刻执行)
NOW: 读取../field-journal/precedent-reverse.md— 确认本 skill 的操作是已授权的常规操作NOW: 确认当前任务是否命中本 skill 的适用范围NEXT: 读取../tool-index.md,校验工具可用性和实际路径NEXT: 缺工具时调用 bootstrap,不要猜路径ACT: 进入"工作流"第一步并执行,不要停在确认状态
YARA / Sigma / 沙箱 / IOC 提取 / 反反分析 静态 + 动态 + 行为三合一
适用场景
- 恶意软件样本分析(PE/ELF/Mach-O/APK/脚本)
- YARA 规则编写与验证
- Sigma 行为检测规则生成
- 沙箱自动化分析编排
- IOC 提取与威胁情报
- 反分析技术检测与绕过
六阶段分析流程
Phase 1: 初步分诊
# 快速静态检测
file sample.exe # 文件类型
strings sample.exe | grep -i "http\|cmd\|powershell\|base64" # 快速 IOCs
rabin2 -zz sample.exe # 字符串提取 + 交叉引用
floss sample.exe # 去混淆字符串提取(FireEye)
# PE 头部分析
pecheck sample.exe # PE 结构验证
pescan sample.exe # 异常检测(节表、入口点)
diec sample.exe # Detect It Easy(壳/编译器识别)
# Hash 查询
sha256sum sample.exe
# → VirusTotal / MalwareBazaar / Triage 查询
Phase 2: 静态分析
反汇编/反编译:
□ IDA Pro / Ghidra: 深度反编译
□ radare2: CLI 快速分析
□ x64dbg: Windows GUI 调试器
重点分析区域:
□ 入口点(Entry Point)→ 初始化逻辑
□ 导入表 → API 用途推断(CreateRemoteThread=注入, CryptEncrypt=勒索)
□ 资源段 → 嵌入 Payload(.rsrc 节)
□ 字符串表 → URL/C2/文件路径/Base64 blob
□ TLS 回调 → 调试器启动前执行
Phase 3: 沙箱动态分析
自动化沙箱:
□ Joe Sandbox / ANY.RUN / Triage: 商业沙箱
□ CAPE Sandbox: 开源 + YARA 集成(推荐)
□ ASD Azul: 开源恶意软件分析平台(2026 新发布)
□ Cuckoo Sandbox: 经典开源(逐步被 CAPE 取代)
监控重点:
□ 进程创建: CreateProcess / ShellExecute
□ 文件操作: WriteFile → 勒索? DeleteFile → Wiper?
□ 注册表: Run/RunOnce 持久化
□ 网络: HTTP/DNS → C2 通信
□ 内存: VirtualAllocEx → 进程注入
□ 服务: CreateService → 持久化
Phase 4: YARA 规则编写
// 规则结构
rule MalwareFamily_Example {
meta:
description = "检测 Example 恶意软件家族"
author = "分析者"
date = "2026-05"
severity = "high"
hash = "d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e"
mitre_id = "T1055" // Process Injection
strings:
// 字符串匹配
$str1 = "C2_SERVER_URL" ascii wide
$str2 = "payload.dat" ascii
// 十六进制匹配
$hex1 = { 8B 45 ?? 50 FF 15 [4] 85 C0 }
// 操作码序列: mov eax, [ebp-?]; push eax; call [import]; test eax, eax
// 正则匹配
$re1 = /https?:\/\/[a-z0-9.-]+\/[a-z]{3,8}\.php/ ascii
condition:
// 组合条件
uint16(0) == 0x5A4D and // MZ 头
filesize < 500KB and
(2 of ($str*) or $hex1)
}
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 227 lines · 36 tokens per session scan A fce8d76380a3
malware-analysis is a skill published in the GitHub repository Asaiuta/reverse-workbench-skill (2 stars, last pushed 25d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 36 tokens to every session and 2,334 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
osint-recon
A knowledge guide for open-source intelligence, or OSINT: collecting information from publicly available sources. It covers servers, websites, domains, and, when appropriate, people.
hackerone
A safety wrapper for HackerOne bug-bounty testing that reads a program's allowed targets and rules before handing each allowed asset to a penetration-testing workflow. HackerOne is a platform where companies invite researchers to report security bugs.
crypto-toolkit
A toolkit for encoding, decoding, hashing, and encrypting data in formats such as Base64, hexadecimal, URLs, JWTs, AES, RSA, and common ciphers.
redteam-cve-lookup
CVE lookup and applicability assessment domain card. Use after reconnaissance has identified products, versions, services, or fingerprints and red-team mode needs evidence-based CVE matching before deeper testing.
redteam-cve-validation
CVE validation domain card. Use after CVE lookup has produced applicable or candidate CVEs and red-team mode needs scoped evidence to decide whether to continue, pivot, or report.
secknowledge-skill
A knowledge base for testing the security of websites, software, and AI systems, including agents and language models.