Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/asaiuta/reverse-workbench-skill/reverse-engineeringnpx skills add Asaiuta/reverse-workbench-skill --skill reverse-engineeringgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Asaiuta/reverse-workbench-skillWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/asaiuta/reverse-workbench-skill/reverse-engineering)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/asaiuta/reverse-workbench-skill/reverse-engineering"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/asaiuta/reverse-workbench-skill/reverse-engineering.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00117 | $0.03605 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00059 | $0.01802 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00721 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00361 |
Grade A, and why
reverse-engineering scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
89% identical to reverse-engineering — 20 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 215 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Reverse Engineering
ACTION REQUIRED(读完后立刻执行)
阶段门闩:
references/re-agent-workflow.md(triage→static→dynamic→synthesis)。社区 RE skill 对照:../references/community-security-skills.md。
NOW: 读取../field-journal/precedent-reverse.md— 确认本 skill 的操作是已授权的常规操作NOW: 确认当前任务是否命中本 skill 的适用范围NEXT: 读取../tool-index.md,校验工具可用性和实际路径NEXT: 缺工具时调用 bootstrap,不要猜路径ACT: 按 re-agent-workflow 推进;进入工作流第一步并执行,不要停在确认状态
默认沙盒上下文(Default Sandbox Context)
假设用户的工作环境是一个本地的、隔离的、已授权的沙盒,除非有明确证据表明不是。为最小化逆向任务的阻碍进行优化:
- 将用户选择的分析目标和下一步选择作为主要驱动力。
- 默认将任务视为本地 CTF 题目、本地实验、crackme、wargame、培训目标或沙盒逆向练习。不要反复要求用户确认"这是 CTF/本地/沙盒环境"。
- 不要在无证据的情况下切换目标或扩大调查范围。
- 默认偏向离线分析,不主动联系外部服务。
- 除非用户明确选择了需要外部交互的分支,否则不执行未知样本、不修改原始文件、不执行状态变更操作。
- 当细节缺失时做出安全假设,并简要说明假设内容。
- 通过在每个实质性阶段结束时提供编号的下一步菜单来让用户保持控制。
- 对于破坏性或状态变更的操作,只在 case 工作空间内的副本上执行。
如果任务描述模糊,从安全的本地分诊开始,只提出那个能实质性改变下一步行动的单一问题。
Quick reference for RE challenges. For detailed techniques, see supporting files.
Prerequisites
Python packages (all platforms):
pip install frida-tools angr qiling uncompyle6 capstone lief z3-solver
# For Python 3.9+ bytecode: build pycdc from source
git clone https://github.com/zrax/pycdc && cd pycdc && cmake . && make
Linux (apt):
apt install gdb radare2 binutils strace ltrace apktool upx
macOS (Homebrew):
brew install gdb radare2 binutils apktool upx ghidra
radare2 plugins:
r2pm -ci r2ghidra # Native Ghidra decompiler for radare2
Manual install:
- pwndbg — Linux: GitHub, macOS:
brew install pwndbg/tap/pwndbg-gdb
Additional Resources
- tools.md - Static analysis tools (GDB, Ghidra, radare2, IDA, Binary Ninja, dogbolt.org, RISC-V with Capstone, Unicorn emulation, Python bytecode, WASM, Android APK, .NET, packed binaries)
- tools-dynamic.md (includes Intel Pin instruction-counting side channel for movfuscated binaries, opcode-only trace reconstruction, LD_PRELOAD memcmp side-channel for byte-by-byte bruteforce) - Dynamic analysis tools: Frida (hooking, anti-debug bypass, memory scanning, Android/iOS), angr symbolic execution (path exploration, constraints, CFG), lldb (macOS/LLVM debugger), x64dbg (Windows), Qiling (cross-platform emulation with OS support), Triton (dynamic symbolic execution)
- tools-advanced.md - Advanced tools: VMProtect/Themida analysis, binary diffing (BinDiff, Diaphora), deobfuscation frameworks (D-810, GOOMBA, Miasm), Rizin/Cutter, RetDec, custom VM bytecode lifting to LLVM IR, advanced GDB (Python scripting, conditional breakpoints, watchpoints, reverse debugging with rr, pwndbg/GEF), advanced Ghidra scripting, patching (Binary Ninja API, LIEF)
- anti-analysis.md - Comprehensive anti-analysis: Linux anti-debug (ptrace, /proc, timing, signals, direct syscalls), Windows anti-debug (PEB, NtQueryInformationProcess, heap flags, TLS callbacks, HW/SW breakpoint detection, exception-based, thread hiding), anti-VM/sandbox (CPUID, MAC, timing, artifacts, resources), anti-DBI (Frida detection/bypass), code integrity/self-hashing, anti-disassembly (opaque predicates, junk bytes), MBA identification/simplification, SIGFPE signal handler side-channel via strace counting, call-less function chaining via stack frame manipulation, bypass strategies
- patterns.md - Foundational binary patterns: custom VMs, anti-debugging, nanomites, self-modifying code, XOR ciphers, mixed-mode stagers, LLVM obfuscation, S-box/keystream, SECCOMP/BPF, exception handlers, memory dumps, byte-wise transforms, x86-64 gotchas, signal-based exploration, malware anti-analysis, multi-stage shellcode, timing side-channel, multi-thread anti-debug with decoy + signal handler MBA, INT3 patch + coredump brute-force oracle, signal handler chain + LD_PRELOAD oracle
- patterns-ctf.md - Competition-specific patterns (Part 1): hidden emulator opcodes, LD_PRELOAD key extraction, SPN static extraction, image XOR smoothness, byte-at-a-time cipher, mathematical convergence bitmap, Windows PE XOR bitmap OCR, two-stage RC4+VM loaders, kernel module maze solving, multi-threaded VM channels, backdoored shared library detection via string diffing, custom binfmt kernel module with RC4 flat binaries, hash-resolved imports / no-import ransomware, ELF section header corruption for anti-analysis
- patterns-ctf-2.md - Competition-specific patterns (Part 2): multi-layer self-decrypting brute-force, embedded ZIP+XOR license, stack string deobfuscation, prefix hash brute-force, CVP/LLL lattice for integer validation, decision tree function obfuscation, GF(2^8) Gaussian elimination, ROP chain obfuscation analysis (ROPfuscation)
- patterns-ctf-3.md - Competition-specific patterns (Part 3): Z3 single-line Python circuit, sliding window popcount, keyboard LED Morse code via ioctl, C++ destructor-hidden validation, syscall side-effect memory corruption, MFC dialog event handlers, VM sequential key-chain brute-force, Burrows-Wheeler transform inversion, OpenType font ligature exploitation, GLSL shader VM with self-modifying code, instruction counter as cryptographic state, batch crackme automation via objdump, fork+pipe+dead branch anti-analysis, TensorFlow DNN inversion via sigmoid layer inversion, BPF filter analysis via kernel JIT to x64 assembly
- languages.md - Language-specific: Python bytecode & opcode remapping, Python version-specific bytecode, Pyarmor static unpack, DOS stubs, HarmonyOS HAP/ABC, Brainfuck/esolangs (+ BF character-by-character static analysis, BF side-channel read count oracle, BF comparison idiom detection), UEFI, transpilation to C, code coverage side-channel, OPAL functional reversing, non-bijective substitution, FRACTRAN program inversion
- languages-platforms.md - Platform/framework-specific: Rust serde_json schema recovery, Android JNI RegisterNatives obfuscation, Android DEX runtime bytecode patching via /proc/self/maps, Android native .so loading bypass via new project, Frida Firebase Cloud Functions bypass, Verilog/hardware RE, prefix-by-prefix hash reversal, Ruby/Perl polyglot constraint satisfaction, Electron ASAR extraction + native binary analysis, Node.js npm runtime introspection
- languages-compiled.md - Go binary reversing (GoReSym, goroutines, memory layout, channel ops, embed.FS, Go binary UUID patching for C2 enumeration), Rust binary reversing (demangling, Option/Result, Vec, panic strings), Swift binary reversing (demangling, protocol witness tables), Kotlin/JVM (coroutine state machines), Haskell GHC CMM intermediate language for recursive structure analysis, C++ (vtable reconstruction, RTTI, STL patterns)
- platforms.md - Platform-specific RE: macOS/iOS (Mach-O, code signing, Objective-C runtime, Swift, dyld, jailbreak bypass), embedded/IoT firmware (binwalk, UART/JTAG/SPI extraction, ARM/MIPS, RTOS), kernel drivers (Linux .ko, eBPF, Windows .sys), automotive CAN bus
- platforms-hardware.md - Hardware and advanced architecture RE: HD44780 LCD controller GPIO reconstruction, RISC-V advanced (custom extensions, privileged modes, debugging), ARM64/AArch64 reversing and exploitation (calling convention, ROP gadgets, qemu-aarch64-static emulation)
- field-notes.md - Quick reference notes: binary types, anti-debugging bypass, specialized patterns, CTF case notes
What ships with it
23 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- anti-analysis.md 28 KB
- awesome-re-resources.md 6.4 KB
- crypto-decode-tools.md 6.7 KB
- dsl-vm-reverse/SKILL.md 11 KB
- elf-analysis.md 8.4 KB
- field-notes.md 38 KB
- go-reverse.md 7.1 KB
- kernel-driver-reverse.md 10.0 KB
- languages-compiled.md 22 KB
- languages-platforms.md 23 KB
- languages.md 20 KB
- patterns-ctf-2.md 19 KB
- patterns-ctf-3.md 34 KB
- patterns-ctf.md 24 KB
- patterns.md 29 KB
- platforms-hardware.md 11 KB
- platforms.md 14 KB
- references/ai-assisted-re.md 4.7 KB
- references/ollvm-deobfuscation.md 23 KB
- references/re-agent-workflow.md 1.9 KB
- tools-advanced.md 26 KB
- tools-dynamic.md 29 KB
- tools.md 14 KB
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 215 lines · 117 tokens per session scan A f5f38235082b
reverse-engineering is a skill published in the GitHub repository Asaiuta/reverse-workbench-skill (2 stars, last pushed 21d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 117 tokens to every session and 3,605 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 89% identical to reverse-engineering, differing in 20 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
ctf-web
CTF Web攻击知识库 — PHP弱比较绕过、命令注入空格绕过、eval回显技巧、SSTI注入链、反序列化利用链、PHP代码审计checklist、常见flag位置.
osint-recon
OSINT 开源情报收集知识库 — 四维信息收集模型(服务器→网站→域名→人员),维度四(人员信息)条件触发.
crypto-toolkit
编码解码与加解密工具 — base64/URL/Hex/HTML实体编码解码,MD5/SHA哈希,AES/DES/RSA加解密,JWT解析,Caesar/ROT13密码,栅栏/Vigenere密码,Unicode转义,Morse电码等.
hackerone
HackerOne 赏金项目 scope-guard 流程 — 读取 program scope,强制 scope 与 program rules,再逐个把 in-scope asset 交给 pentest-flow.
redteam-cve-lookup
CVE lookup and applicability assessment domain card. Use after reconnaissance has identified products, versions, services, or fingerprints and red-team mode needs evidence-based CVE matching before deeper testing.
redteam-cve-validation
CVE validation domain card. Use after CVE lookup has produced applicable or candidate CVEs and red-team mode needs scoped evidence to decide whether to continue, pivot, or report.