Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add asaotomo/DeepSentry --skill awd-plusgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/asaotomo/DeepSentryWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/asaotomo/deepsentry/awd-plus)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/asaotomo/deepsentry/awd-plus"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/asaotomo/deepsentry/awd-plus/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/asaotomo/deepsentry/awd-plus"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/asaotomo/deepsentry/awd-plus.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00032 | $0.00704 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00282 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00141 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00070 |
Grade A, and why
awd-plus scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 28d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
AWD-plus Skill
何时使用
- 用户提到 AWD-plus、多服务、多队伍、多目标防守、态势运营、比赛值守。
- 需要把服务可用性、日志、文件、网络连接和 flag 暴露统一成证据链。
工作方式
- 先用
todo建立 3-7 项检查清单，避免遗漏服务、日志和文件线索。 - 多目标环境先
fleet_inventory，核对目标名、标签、协议和匹配数量。selector 用逗号取交集、|取并集；按队伍、服务、操作系统和协议分组。不要给混合 Windows/Linux 或 SSH/FTP 目标发送同一命令。 - 建立“目标 × 服务”矩阵，记录 URL/端口、预期 HTTP 状态/关键文本、上次正常证据。用
awd_service_check并发探活；WARN/DOWN 节点单独复查，不把 TCP OPEN 当作业务正常。 - 主机面同组只读巡检用
fleet_exec，每台独立分析才用task+target_selector；Web 面按异常节点调用webshell-hunter，网络/日志线索交对应专项 Agent。 - 证据面使用
fleet_file read/download、read_log、read_gzip、proc_socket_map；多目标下载会自动生成不同本地文件名，报告应保留实际路径和目标对应关系。 - 处置队列按“服务中断、正在被利用、证据保全、普通配置问题”排序。变更按运行器风险确认执行，先验证少量目标，再逐组扩展；每组复验服务、日志和文件状态。
- 用户明确要求持续值守时，可先用
schedule_task plan规划周期和 selector；仅在用户要求创建持久任务时使用schedule_task add。周期任务只做可重复的健康检查与异常汇总，避免重复执行修复。
推荐委派
{"action":"task","task_name":"awd-defender","task_prompt":"检查当前目标 Web 服务可用性、Webshell 和日志异常"}
{"action":"task","task_name":"network-analyst","task_prompt":"分析异常连接和可疑出站流量"}
输出格式
## AWD-plus 态势报告
### 当前态势
### 服务/目标矩阵
逐行列目标、服务、预期值、实测值、延迟、异常时间和责任分工。
### 证据链
### 风险排序
### 待确认处置队列
标明 selector、匹配数量、动作、影响范围、复验状态。
边界
- 聚焦防守运营，不做自动攻击编排。
- 保留证据优先；删除、覆盖、重启服务前必须说明影响并请求确认。
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 28d ago Changed · +3 lines 33772306a3e8
- 1mo ago First seen · 45 lines · 32 tokens per session scan A 3ad3c988e500
awd-plus is a skill published in the GitHub repository asaotomo/DeepSentry (38 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 32 tokens to every session and 704 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
go-expert
Expert-level Go development with Go 1.22+ features, concurrency, standard library, and production-grade best practices. Use when the user mentions concurrency, microservices, or backend, or when the task involves idiomatic Go, goroutines and channels, context-based cancellation, or writing an HTTP server.
golang-testing
Go testing best practices including table-driven tests, test helpers, benchmarking, race detection, coverage analysis, and integration testing patterns. Use when writing or improving Go tests.
golang-patterns
Go-specific design patterns and best practices including functional options, small interfaces, dependency injection, concurrency patterns, error handling, and package organization. Use when working with Go code to apply idiomatic Go patterns.
skill-creator
Create, install, or update skills in the workspace. Use when (1) installing a skill from a URL or remote source, (2) creating a new skill from scratch, (3) updating or restructuring existing skills. Always use this skill for any skill installation or creation task.
image-generation
Generate or edit images from text prompts. Use when the user asks to create, draw, design, or edit an image, illustration, photo, icon, poster, or any visual content.
ax-go-gen
Use when writing Go code with github.com/ax-llm/ax/packages/go for AxGen programs, forward calls, indexed multi-sampling, result pickers, streaming, tools, assertions, traces, usage, and output parsing.