Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/ash1794/vibe-engineering/gap-analysisnpx skills add ash1794/vibe-engineering --skill gap-analysisgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ash1794/vibe-engineeringWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ash1794/vibe-engineering/gap-analysis)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ash1794/vibe-engineering/gap-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ash1794/vibe-engineering/gap-analysis.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00036 | $0.01358 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00679 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00272 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00136 |
Grade A, and why
vibe-gap-analysis scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- vibe-gap-analysis — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 144 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
vibe-gap-analysis
Cynical gap analysis comparing specs/architecture to actual implementation. Three modes from fast to exhaustive. Works with any project that has architecture docs and implementation code.
When to Use This Skill
- Before launching to production
- After a major refactor to verify nothing was lost
- When inheriting a codebase and need to assess completeness
- Periodic production readiness audits
- When stakeholders ask "how done are we?"
When NOT to Use This Skill
- Greenfield projects with no specs yet (write specs first)
- Simple bug fixes or feature additions
- Frontend-only or design-only reviews
Usage
/vibe-gap-analysis # Quick static (5 structural dimensions)
/vibe-gap-analysis --deep # Full 17-dimension audit with parallel agents
/vibe-gap-analysis --dim N # Single dimension deep-dive (1-17)
/vibe-gap-analysis --dim 1,4,9 # Multiple specific dimensions
Modes
Quick Static (default)
Fast, single-agent structural audit. No subagents dispatched.
- Read architecture/design docs in
docs/or similar - Read implementation code in
src/,internal/,lib/etc. - Compare implementation against architecture doc section by section
- Cover dimensions 1-5 (structural):
- Dim 1: Spec Compliance — check specs against implementation
- Dim 2: Backend Code Quality — test coverage, error handling, lint issues
- Dim 3: Frontend Completeness — UI components, routes, test coverage
- Dim 4: Deployment & Ops — deploy scripts, CI/CD, Docker, TLS
- Dim 5: Architecture Integrity — design pattern compliance, component boundaries
- Produce structured gap report: component, expected status, actual status, % complete, action items
- Save to
docs/plans/gap-analysis-$(date +%Y%m%d).md - Commit with
docs: gap analysis $(date +%Y%m%d)
Deep (--deep)
Full 17-dimension audit using parallel subagents. Exhaustive production readiness assessment.
Dispatch parallel agents (model: sonnet) in 3 rounds:
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 144 lines · 36 tokens per session scan A 092ddcd537ea
vibe-gap-analysis is a skill published in the GitHub repository ash1794/vibe-engineering (10 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 36 tokens to every session and 1,358 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
pptgen-drawio
根据论文或汇报内容生成多页 Draw.io 格式 PPT,支持论文答辩与通用汇报两种模式,自动导出为 .pptx。当用户提到论文答辩 PPT、答辩幻灯片、通用 PPT、汇报 PPT、根据模板生成 PPT、drawio2pptx 时使用。.
create-skill
Guides users through creating effective Agent Skills for Cursor. Use when the user wants to create, write, or author a new skill, or asks about skill structure, best practices, or SKILL.md format.
wechat-article-writer
公众号/自媒体全流程。根据用户表述自动匹配:撰写文章、封面图、正文插图、风格提取。支持多种写作风格。当用户提到写公众号、技术博客、公众号封面、正文插图、步骤图、演示图、流程示意、分析写作风格、克隆文风、模仿爆款、提取风格时使用。详见 reference 目录。.
project-docs
对任意代码项目生成一套面向新人的循序渐进文档集,输出到 docs/ 目录。含架构、设计思想、语言特性、代码导读、运行时模型、构建、对接、调试、设计规范共 9 篇,支持全部生成 / 只写几篇 / 更新已有文档。当用户提到"生成项目文档"、"新人文档"、"上手文档"、"架构文档"、"代码导读"、"项目理解"、"深入理解项目"、"onboarding 文档"、"给新同事看的文档"时使用。要按用户给的格式写论文章节、项目梳理、重点问题、简历项目描述的,用 codegen-doc。.
drawio-diagram
为深度学习模型、网络架构、算法流程等生成标准 Draw.io (.drawio) 格式的可视化图表;支持从零生成与风格迁移两种模式。从零生成:模型架构图、流程图、感受野示意图等;风格迁移:参考图 + 内容描述/项目 → 按参考图风格生成新图。确保 XML 格式正确,可直接在 Draw.io 中打开编辑。.
skill-prompt-convert
在 Skill(SKILL.md)与 Prompt(聊天框指令)两种格式之间相互转换。支持 Skill→Prompt 与 Prompt→Skill 双向转换,保持核心信息零丢失。当用户提到 Skill 转 Prompt、Prompt 转 Skill、格式互转、SKILL.md 转换时使用。.