vibe-fuzz-parser-inputs

vibe-fuzz-parser-inputs is a skill for Claude Code from ash1794/vibe-engineering. It costs 70 tokens per session (723 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of audit, MIT.

A tool that creates starting code for fuzz tests of parsers. Fuzz testing feeds many unexpected inputs to software to find crashes and other handling problems.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it when parsing YAML, JSON, XML, configuration files, domain-specific languages, webhook data, API responses, or other external input.
Why use it?
It helps expose parser failures that ordinary example-based tests may miss, including problems with empty, malformed, binary, or unusual input.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: user-invocable in frontmatter.

Part of the vibe-engineering plugin — 33 skills shipped together

Good fit Use it when parsing YAML, JSON, XML, configuration files, domain-specific languages, webhook data, API responses, or other external input.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/ash1794/vibe-engineering/vibe-fuzz-parser-inputs
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add ash1794/vibe-engineering --skill vibe-fuzz-parser-inputs
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ash1794/vibe-engineering

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install vibe-engineering, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 33 skills.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for vibe-fuzz-parser-inputs

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ash1794/vibe-engineering/vibe-fuzz-parser-inputs/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ash1794/vibe-engineering/vibe-fuzz-parser-inputs)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ash1794/vibe-engineering/vibe-fuzz-parser-inputs"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ash1794/vibe-engineering/vibe-fuzz-parser-inputs/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for vibe-fuzz-parser-inputs

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ash1794/vibe-engineering/vibe-fuzz-parser-inputs"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ash1794/vibe-engineering/vibe-fuzz-parser-inputs.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 70 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 723 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin 86% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00070 $0.00723
Opus 5.5 $0.00028 $0.00289
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00014 $0.00145
Haiku 4.5 $0.00007 $0.00072

Measured 8d ago against content hash 64346911124e, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

vibe-fuzz-parser-inputs scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

86% identical to audit — 101 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

plugins/vibe-engineering/skills/vibe-fuzz-parser-inputs/SKILL.md · 97 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 97 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

vibe-fuzz-parser-inputs

Every parser will eventually see input you didn't expect. Fuzz testing finds the crashes before production does.

When to Use This Skill

  • Implementing any parser (YAML, JSON, XML, config, DSL)
  • Processing user-supplied input
  • Handling webhook payloads or API responses
  • Parsing file formats

When NOT to Use This Skill

  • The parser is a well-tested standard library (e.g., encoding/json)
  • You're only reading known, controlled input
  • The parser is trivial (e.g., splitting a string by comma)

Steps

Go Fuzz Tests

  1. Create fuzz test file (parser_fuzz_test.go):

    func FuzzParseConfig(f *testing.F) {
        // Seed corpus from existing test fixtures
        files, _ := filepath.Glob("testdata/*.yaml")
        for _, file := range files {
            data, _ := os.ReadFile(file)
            f.Add(data)
        }
    
        // Add targeted seeds
        f.Add([]byte(""))           // empty
        f.Add([]byte("{}"))         // minimal valid
        f.Add([]byte("\x00\x00"))   // binary
    
        f.Fuzz(func(t *testing.T, data []byte) {
            // Should never panic
            result, err := ParseConfig(data)
            if err != nil {
                return // errors are fine
            }
            // If no error, result should be valid
            if result.Name == "" {
                t.Error("parsed successfully but Name is empty")
            }
        })
    }
    
  2. Seed the corpus from:

    • Existing test fixtures
    • Real production examples
    • Known edge cases
    • Minimally valid inputs
    • Binary/garbage data
  3. Run initial fuzz:

    go test -fuzz=FuzzParseConfig -fuzztime=30s
    
  4. Record results:

    • Crashes found
    • New corpus entries generated
    • Edge cases discovered
  5. Fix crashes -- Every panic or unexpected behavior becomes a permanent test case

Other Languages

  • JavaScript/TypeScript: Use jest-fuzz or fast-check property-based testing
  • Python: Use hypothesis for property-based testing
  • Rust: Use cargo-fuzz with libfuzzer

Read the full file on GitHub · 97 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 8d ago Changed · +28 tokens per session 64346911124e
  2. 20d ago First seen · 97 lines · 42 tokens per session scan A ca7b2689204c

Subscribe to this mod's changes

vibe-fuzz-parser-inputs is a skill published in the GitHub repository ash1794/vibe-engineering (164 stars, last pushed 8d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 70 tokens to every session and 723 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 86% identical to audit, differing in 101 lines, and is treated as a copy.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

cherry-regression-test

Run Cherry Studio critical-path system regression tasks through the repository-owned Playwright E2E workflow. Use for full regression, release acceptance, development-branch system validation, or a named cherry-regression-test task on GitHub-hosted macOS and Windows runners.

CherryHQ/cherry-studio · 58 tokens

feature-verify

Feature verification (READ-ONLY, P0-P5). Use when: verifying feature behavior after deployment, validating API responses, diagnosing production issues, post-deploy smoke test. Not for: modifying data (use feature-dev), code review (use codex-review-fast), writing tests (use codex-test-gen), security audit (use…

sd0xdev/sd0x-harness · 75 tokens

test-health

Holistic test coverage measurement. Use when: assessing test health, measuring coverage trends, quantitative + qualitative test audit. Not for: running tests (use verify), reviewing test sufficiency only (use codex-test-review), generating tests (use codex-test-gen). Output: multi-dimensional dashboard with coverage…

sd0xdev/sd0x-harness · 70 tokens

test-review

Test coverage review via Codex exec. Use when: reviewing test sufficiency, identifying coverage gaps, test quality audit. Not for: generating tests (use codex-test-gen), code review (use codex-code-review). Output: coverage analysis + gap report.

sd0xdev/sd0x-harness · 56 tokens

post-dev-test

Post-development test completion. Use when: checking test coverage after feature-dev, writing missing integration/e2e tests. Not for: unit test generation (use codex-test-gen), test review (use test-review). Output: test files + coverage report.

sd0xdev/sd0x-harness · 55 tokens

pre-pr-audit

Pre-PR confidence audit with 5-dimension scoring. Use when: final check before commit/push/PR, evaluating PR readiness, assessing test quality + risk + coverage holistically. Triggers: pre-pr, readiness check, confidence audit, final verification, ready to PR, how confident. Not for: code review (use…

sd0xdev/sd0x-harness · 95 tokens