Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ash1794/vibe-engineering --skill vibe-parallel-task-decompositiongit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ash1794/vibe-engineeringWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ash1794/vibe-engineering/vibe-parallel-task-decomposition)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ash1794/vibe-engineering/vibe-parallel-task-decomposition"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ash1794/vibe-engineering/vibe-parallel-task-decomposition/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ash1794/vibe-engineering/vibe-parallel-task-decomposition"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ash1794/vibe-engineering/vibe-parallel-task-decomposition.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00065 | $0.00723 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00026 | $0.00289 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00145 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00072 |
Grade A, and why
vibe-parallel-task-decomposition scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- vibe-parallel-task-decomposition — 88% identical, 9 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 79 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
vibe-parallel-task-decomposition
Large tasks are often collections of independent subtasks hiding behind a sequential mental model. Find the parallelism.
When to Use This Skill
- Facing a task with 5+ subtasks
- Multiple files need changes that don't depend on each other
- Implementation plan has steps that could run concurrently
- User asks to "speed this up" or "parallelize"
When NOT to Use This Skill
- Tasks with fewer than 3 subtasks
- All subtasks depend on each other sequentially
- Changes are all in the same file
- The overhead of coordination exceeds the benefit
- Long-running, multi-phase work with follow-ups (use
vibe-workstream-orchestration)
Steps
-
List all subtasks from the plan or requirements
-
Build dependency graph — For each pair of tasks, ask:
- Do they modify the same file? → dependent
- Does task B need output from task A? → dependent
- Do they share mutable state? → dependent
- Otherwise → independent (can parallelize)
-
Group into batches:
- Batch 0: Tasks with no dependencies (run first, in parallel)
- Batch 1: Tasks that depend only on Batch 0 (run after Batch 0, in parallel)
- Batch N: Continue until all tasks assigned
-
Set parallelism limit — Use the harness's native parallelism (subagents, background tasks, workflows, or cloud tasks) and respect its concurrency limits. Past a handful of concurrent streams, the integration and review cost usually outweighs the speedup, so 3–5 is a sensible default unless the tasks are trivially independent.
-
Isolate — Give each parallel stream its own worktree or branch if the harness supports isolation, so streams can't overwrite each other's files. Integrate afterwards with
vibe-cherry-pick-integration. -
Create dispatch plan:
Output Format
Parallel Task Decomposition
Total Tasks: X Batches: Y Max Parallelism: Z agents Estimated Speedup: ~Nx vs sequential
Dependency Graph
Task A ──→ Task D
Task B ──→ Task D
Task C (independent)
Task D ──→ Task F
Task E (independent)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago Changed · +27 tokens per session 50ae093fafae
- 20d ago Changed · +1 lines 690e7f8c83dd
- 23d ago First seen · 78 lines · 38 tokens per session scan A 3b34644778cf
vibe-parallel-task-decomposition is a skill published in the GitHub repository ash1794/vibe-engineering (164 stars, last pushed 12d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 65 tokens to every session and 723 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-26.
Other skills, from other repositories
cherry-regression-test
Run Cherry Studio critical-path system regression tasks through the repository-owned Playwright E2E workflow. Use for full regression, release acceptance, development-branch system validation, or a named cherry-regression-test task on GitHub-hosted macOS and Windows runners.
feature-verify
Feature verification (READ-ONLY, P0-P5). Use when: verifying feature behavior after deployment, validating API responses, diagnosing production issues, post-deploy smoke test. Not for: modifying data (use feature-dev), code review (use codex-review-fast), writing tests (use codex-test-gen), security audit (use…
test-review
Test coverage review via Codex exec. Use when: reviewing test sufficiency, identifying coverage gaps, test quality audit. Not for: generating tests (use codex-test-gen), code review (use codex-code-review). Output: coverage analysis + gap report.
post-dev-test
Post-development test completion. Use when: checking test coverage after feature-dev, writing missing integration/e2e tests. Not for: unit test generation (use codex-test-gen), test review (use test-review). Output: test files + coverage report.
pre-pr-audit
Pre-PR confidence audit with 5-dimension scoring. Use when: final check before commit/push/PR, evaluating PR readiness, assessing test quality + risk + coverage holistically. Triggers: pre-pr, readiness check, confidence audit, final verification, ready to PR, how confident. Not for: code review (use…
test-deep
Context-aware test orchestration. Use when: smart test selection, failure triage, progressive test ladder, test failure analysis. Not for: writing tests (use post-dev-test), reviewing tests (use codex-test-review), generating tests (use codex-test-gen), full manual run (use verify). Output: test results + triage…