Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add asherzj/ashers-agent-skills --skill grillinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/asherzj/ashers-agent-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/asherzj/ashers-agent-skills/grilling)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/asherzj/ashers-agent-skills/grilling"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/asherzj/ashers-agent-skills/grilling/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/asherzj/ashers-agent-skills/grilling"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/asherzj/ashers-agent-skills/grilling.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00048 | $0.00523 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00024 | $0.00262 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00105 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00052 |
Grade A, and why
grilling scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
毫不留情地访谈用户，直到达成共同理解。把这件事建模为一棵设计树：每个决策都会分叉出悬挂在它之下的那些决策。
以轮次推进这棵树。**前沿（frontier）**是所有前置项均已敲定的那些决策：那些你_现在_就能问、而不必去猜你还没听到的答案的问题。一轮之内把整个前沿问完：给每个问题编号，并给出你推荐的答案。然后等用户回答之后再进入下一轮。
一轮的格式如下：
❓ **Q1** - **<question title>**: <question body, might be multiple paragraphs, including multiple choices>
➡️ <your recommended answer>
---
❓ **Q2** - **<question title>**: <question body, might be multiple paragraphs, including multiple choices>
➡️ <your recommended answer>
用户作答的每一轮都会重塑这棵树：敲定的决策把前沿向外推，解锁了依赖它们的问题。重新计算前沿，再问下一轮。如果某个问题的答案依赖于本轮仍然悬而未决的另一个问题，它就属于_更晚的_轮次，而不是这一轮。
找_事实_是你的工作，永远不是用户的。当前沿上的问题需要一个来自环境的事实（文件系统、工具等）时，派一个子代理去查；凡是你自己能查到的东西，就不要拿去问用户。也不要被它卡住：一个仍在进行的探索就是一个未敲定的前置项，所以只有它下游的问题才等子代理汇报；其余的前沿问题现在就问。_决策_归用户：把每一条都摆到他们面前，然后等待。
当前沿为空时，会话即告完成：设计树的每个分支都已走到，没有任何东西被默默假设。在用户确认你们已达成共同理解之前，不要据此动手。
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 29 lines · 48 tokens per session scan A 8456e56e6b40
grilling is a skill published in the GitHub repository asherzj/ashers-agent-skills (2 stars, last pushed 12d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 48 tokens to every session and 523 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
local-ai-agents
Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…
next-cache-components-adoption
Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…
insight-error-page
Write or audit an insight-kind error page for the Next.js dev overlay. Use when creating a new errors/ .mdx page, auditing an existing one, or checking that a page matches the framework fix cards. Covers page structure, title alignment, FixCard cards with Copy prompt button, code snippets, terminology verification…
next-cache-components-optimizer
Drive a Next.js route to instant navigation by setting up an agentic loop, under Cache Components / PPR, on initial load (hard navigation) and client-side navigation (soft navigation). Encode the goal as a failing @next/playwright instant() e2e and work it to green, one verified route at a time; the shipped test then…
next-partial-prefetching-adoption
Turn on Partial Prefetching in a Next.js app and work through the insights it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable or adopt Partial Prefetching, flip the partialPrefetching flag, opt routes in with export const prefetch = 'partial', audit Link prefetch={true} behavior, preserve existing prefetched UI with…