Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to AsiaOstrich/EngramGraph. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/AsiaOstrich/EngramGraph/main/.agents/skills/e2e-assistant/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/AsiaOstrich/EngramGraphWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/asiaostrich/engramgraph/e2e-assistant)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/asiaostrich/engramgraph/e2e-assistant"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/asiaostrich/engramgraph/e2e-assistant/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/asiaostrich/engramgraph/e2e-assistant"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/asiaostrich/engramgraph/e2e-assistant.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00130 | $0.01343 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00052 | $0.00537 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00026 | $0.00269 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00134 |
Grade A, and why
e2e scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 14d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 109 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
E2E Assistant | E2E 助手
[!WARNING] Experimental Feature / 實驗性功能
This feature is under active development and may change significantly in v4.0. 此功能正在積極開發中，可能在 v4.0 中有重大變更。
Generate E2E test skeletons from BDD .feature scenarios, with framework detection and coverage gap analysis.
從 BDD .feature 場景生成 E2E 測試骨架，支援框架偵測與覆蓋差距分析。
Workflow | 工作流程
/derive bdd → .feature 場景
↓
/e2e → 分析 AC 適用性 → 偵測框架 → 參考既有模式 → 生成骨架
↓
手動執行驗證
Modes | 模式
1. Generation Mode (Default) | 生成模式（預設）
Analyze BDD scenarios, classify AC suitability, detect framework, and generate E2E test skeletons.
分析 BDD 場景、分類 AC 適用性、偵測框架、生成 E2E 測試骨架。
2. Analysis Mode (--analyze) | 分析模式
Scan coverage gaps between BDD features and existing E2E tests.
掃描 BDD feature 與既有 E2E 測試之間的覆蓋差距。
AC Classification | AC 分類
| Category | Condition | Example |
|---|---|---|
e2e-suitable |
Multi-step user flow or UI interaction | Login → Action → Verify |
integration-suitable |
Cross-component without UI | API call → DB write |
unit-suitable |
Pure logic or computation | Sort, validate, format |
Supported Frameworks | 支援框架
| Ecosystem | Framework | Auto-detected | Detection signal |
|---|---|---|---|
| JavaScript | Playwright | ✅ | @playwright/test in package.json |
| JavaScript | Cypress | ✅ | cypress dep + config file |
| JavaScript | Vitest | ✅ | vitest dep + e2e directory |
| JavaScript | WebdriverIO | ❌ Manual | listed in SUPPORTED_FRAMEWORKS |
| Python | pytest-playwright | ✅ | pytest-playwright in requirements |
| Python | Selenium + pytest | ✅ | selenium in requirements |
| Python | Robot Framework | ✅ | robotframework in requirements |
| Python | Behave | ✅ | behave in requirements |
| Go | chromedp | ✅ | chromedp in go.mod |
| Go | rod | ✅ | rod in go.mod |
| Java | Selenium WebDriver | ✅ | selenium-java in pom.xml / build.gradle |
| Java | Playwright for Java | ✅ | playwright in pom.xml / build.gradle |
| Java | Gauge | ✅ | gauge-java in pom.xml / build.gradle |
| Ruby | Capybara | ✅ | capybara in Gemfile |
| Ruby | Watir | ✅ | watir in Gemfile |
| C# | Playwright for .NET | ❌ Manual | not yet auto-detected |
| C# | Selenium WebDriver | ❌ Manual | not yet auto-detected |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 14d ago First seen · 109 lines · 130 tokens per session scan A 974ac057ed65
e2e is a skill published in the GitHub repository AsiaOstrich/EngramGraph (3 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 130 tokens to every session and 1,343 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-16.
Other skills, from other repositories
nguyen-ly-test-file-tach-biet
(Use when) Dùng khi cần tạo, review, hoặc tổ chức cấu trúc test file (unit, component) theo mô hình tách biệt 100% khỏi mã nguồn sản phẩm (Electron/Desktop/Frontend), hoặc theo Go convention (test.go cùng package). Bao gồm fixtures, path aliases, build isolation, phân định rõ giữa electron/test/ (nội bộ) với…
kivgraph
Use Kivgraph's local MCP server to search symbols, read their source, and follow references, dependencies, cross-repository consumers and graph status in the indexed code graph.
testing-strategy
Choose the right test type for every change — unit, integration, contract, end-to-end, property-based, mutation, fuzz. Use when adding tests to a new feature, deciding what to test for a bug fix, designing a test pyramid for a service, evaluating coverage targets, or untangling a slow test suite. Stack-agnostic…
end-to-end-testing
Write reliable end-to-end tests that exercise real user journeys — Playwright for web, Maestro for mobile — without the flakiness that makes teams ignore them. Use when adding an end-to-end test, debugging a flaky test, choosing what to cover end-to-end vs unit/integration, setting up CI for browser/device tests, or…
qa
Use when the user asks to run QA without fixing code, including mounted runtime behavior, visible user flows, browser-visible app execution, source-of-truth checks, action/state coverage, route/control inventories, Playwright control sweeps, or QA report generation in repositories.
source-command-swarm-testing
Migrated source command swarm-testing.