Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/asiaostrich/universal-dev-standards/code-review-assistantnpx skills add AsiaOstrich/universal-dev-standards --skill code-review-assistantgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/AsiaOstrich/universal-dev-standardsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/asiaostrich/universal-dev-standards/code-review-assistant)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/asiaostrich/universal-dev-standards/code-review-assistant"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/asiaostrich/universal-dev-standards/code-review-assistant.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00172 | $0.01122 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00086 | $0.00561 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00034 | $0.00224 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00017 | $0.00112 |
Grade A, and why
code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 74 lines · 172 tokens per session scan A 7345b5e3addf
code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository AsiaOstrich/universal-dev-standards (72 stars, last pushed 3d ago), with no licence file. It adds 172 tokens to every session and 1,122 once invoked, about $0.0009 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
sdlc
Route a task to the next synced SDLC workflow based on current artifacts and repo state.
Skill Creator
Standards for creating new High-Density Agent Skills with optimal token economy.
dev-fix
Unified developer workflow for fixing bugs. Analyzes issue-tracker context, cross-checks docs/code, proposes a solution, implements the fix, verifies locally, and delivers a PR/MR.
plan-feature
Plan a feature from BRD-lite brief or clear intent into PRD (What), decisions, implementation plan, and task slices.
review-ticket
Review a ticket or PR through focused specialist lenses: scope, architecture, security, tests, AC coverage, and PR metadata.
common-feedback-reporter
Pre-write audit for skill violations: checks planned code against loaded skill anti-patterns before any file write. Use when writing Flutter/Dart/TS code or editing SKILL.md files with active project skills. Load as composite; on auto-fixed violation, also load +common/common-learning-log.