Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ASK191225/bugbounty-kit --skill sharp-edgesgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ASK191225/bugbounty-kitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ask191225/bugbounty-kit/sharp-edges)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ask191225/bugbounty-kit/sharp-edges"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ask191225/bugbounty-kit/sharp-edges/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ask191225/bugbounty-kit/sharp-edges"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ask191225/bugbounty-kit/sharp-edges.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00074 | $0.02582 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00030 | $0.01033 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00516 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00258 |
Grade A, and why
sharp-edges scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What ships with it
18 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- agents/openai.yaml 128 B
- assets/trail-of-bits-mark.svg 3.0 KB
- references/auth-patterns.md 6.8 KB
- references/case-studies.md 8.0 KB
- references/config-patterns.md 9.5 KB
- references/crypto-apis.md 5.2 KB
- references/lang-c.md 5.5 KB
- references/lang-csharp.md 7.2 KB
- references/lang-go.md 6.5 KB
- references/lang-java.md 6.7 KB
- references/lang-javascript.md 6.8 KB
- references/lang-kotlin.md 6.6 KB
- references/lang-php.md 6.0 KB
- references/lang-python.md 6.5 KB
- references/lang-ruby.md 6.1 KB
- references/lang-rust.md 6.4 KB
- references/lang-swift.md 6.1 KB
- references/language-specific.md 13 KB
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 294 lines · 74 tokens per session scan A 3b69a709c2f8
sharp-edges is a skill published in the GitHub repository ASK191225/bugbounty-kit (4 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 74 tokens to every session and 2,582 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
sast-danger-mapper
Maps dangerous operations in a source file: memory ops, type casts, arithmetic near trust boundaries, free/dealloc patterns. Pattern matching task — list what you see, don't speculate. Use via /sast command.
sast-devils-advocate
Adversarial validator for SAST findings. Your ONLY job is to DISPROVE the candidate. Find every reason it's not exploitable. If you can't disprove it, it survives. Use via /sast command.
sast
Source code vulnerability hunting (SAST). Decomposes analysis into specialized passes: map entry points, map dangerous ops, trace flows, find gaps, adversarial validation, exploit. Usage: /sast [--lang c|cpp|rust|java|python|go|php] [--min-score 4] [--max-files 30] [--skip-static] [--best-of N].
sast-entry-mapper
Maps entry points where untrusted data enters a source file. Lists every function that receives external input with data type, size constraints, and initial validation. Use via /sast command.
sast
Source code vulnerability hunting (SAST). Decomposes analysis into specialized passes: map entry points, map dangerous ops, trace flows, find gaps, adversarial validation, exploit. Usage: /sast [--lang c|cpp|rust|java|python|go|php] [--min-score 4] [--max-files 30] [--skip-static] [--best-of N].
pentest-agents-sast-methodology
A single agent asked to "find vulnerabilities" will hallucinate. The pipeline decomposes the task into focused steps, with external state carrying the synthesis between steps. All agents run on except flow-tracing and gap-analysis, which pin opus for cross-file reasoning depth.