Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add asterinas/KVerus --skill kverus-postprocessgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/asterinas/KVerusWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/asterinas/kverus/kverus-postprocess)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/asterinas/kverus/kverus-postprocess"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/asterinas/kverus/kverus-postprocess/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/asterinas/kverus/kverus-postprocess"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/asterinas/kverus/kverus-postprocess.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00066 | $0.01392 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00026 | $0.00557 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00278 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00139 |
Grade A, and why
kverus-postprocess scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 125 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
KVerus Postprocess
Set AGENT_DIR to the installed agent directory when running commands manually. Skills are read from $AGENT_DIR/skills.
Required Inputs
base: git base ref for diff context, e.g.origin/main.target-path: changed source paths to inspect and simplify, e.g.src/,specs/.verify-command: full verification command. If unavailable, simplification must run in--dry-run.format-command: project formatter command, e.g.cargo fmt,make fmt, or an equivalent.- Optional
rule-repo: GitHubowner/repoused for dynamic review rules. - Optional scope controls:
blocked-pathfor path prefixes that must not change, andgenerated-pathfor generated artifact prefixes.
Workflow
- Inspect the dynamic-rule cache without accessing GitHub:
. "$AGENT_DIR/kverus.env"
"$KVERUS_PYTHON" "$AGENT_DIR/skills/kverus-postprocess/scripts/kverus_postprocess.py" \
--rule-repo <owner/repo> \
--cache-status
The default cache TTL is 72 hours. If the cache is stale or missing and subagents are available, delegate exactly one bounded refresh task to a subagent:
. "$AGENT_DIR/kverus.env"
"$KVERUS_PYTHON" "$AGENT_DIR/skills/kverus-postprocess/scripts/kverus_postprocess.py" \
--rule-repo <owner/repo> \
--refresh-only
Tell the subagent to run only this command, preserve any old cache on failure, make no source edits, and return a concise status. Continue the main workflow immediately instead of waiting for GitHub. If subagents are unavailable, keep using the old cache or static rules; do not perform an automatic synchronous refresh in the main agent.
Run the local checker with --no-refresh-rules so it only consumes the latest available cache:
"$KVERUS_PYTHON" "$AGENT_DIR/skills/kverus-postprocess/scripts/kverus_postprocess.py" \
--base <base-ref> \
--target-path <path1,path2> \
--rule-repo <owner/repo> \
--no-refresh-rules
Fix every ERROR. Review every WARN and fix it unless there is a clear reason to keep the code.
What ships with it
6 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed · +24 lines f1b6cfcbc6a0
- 1mo ago First seen · 101 lines · 66 tokens per session scan A fea705e52745
kverus-postprocess is a skill published in the GitHub repository asterinas/KVerus (27 stars, last pushed 10d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 66 tokens to every session and 1,392 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
github-code-review
Review code changes by analyzing git diffs, leaving inline comments on PRs, and performing thorough pre-push review. Works with gh CLI or falls back to git + GitHub REST API via curl.
github
GitHub operations via gh CLI: issues, PRs, CI runs, code review, API queries. Use when: (1) checking PR status or CI, (2) creating/commenting on issues, (3) listing/filtering PRs or issues, (4) viewing run logs. NOT for: complex web UI interactions requiring manual browser flows (use browser tooling when available)…
requesting-code-review
Pre-commit verification pipeline — static security scan, baseline-aware quality gates, independent reviewer subagent, and auto-fix loop. Use after code changes and before committing, pushing, or opening a PR.
review
Review code changes, pull requests, patches, or a scoped code area for actionable correctness, security, compatibility, and test risks with file and line evidence. Use for review or audit requests; do not use for general proofreading, feature implementation, or debugging a reported failure when the user wants a fix.
debug
Diagnose a concrete failure, regression, crash, hang, flaky test, or incorrect runtime behavior by reproducing it, testing hypotheses, and identifying the evidence-backed root cause. Use when symptoms or failing output exist; do not use for feature implementation without a failure, general code review, or a conceptual…
simplify
Reduce unnecessary code complexity, duplication, indirection, or abstraction while preserving observable behavior and validating equivalence. Use for simplify, cleanup, or behavior-preserving refactor requests; do not use for adding features, diagnosing an unexplained failure, broad code review without a…