kverus-review

kverus-review is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from asterinas/KVerus. It costs 47 tokens per session (3,005 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A review skill for uncommitted or recent Verus changes. It examines executable code, equality reasoning, comments, warnings, and verification results.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it before committing Verus work, with a verification command and optionally a commit to define the review range.
Why use it?
It helps catch changes that alter runtime behavior, use a weaker form of equality unnecessarily, remove useful comments, or introduce verification problems.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for Claude Code and Codex: user-invocable in frontmatter, but also agents/openai.yaml present. Also seen: $skill-name invocation.

Good fit Use it before committing Verus work, with a verification command and optionally a commit to define the review range.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/asterinas/kverus/kverus-review
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add asterinas/KVerus --skill kverus-review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/asterinas/KVerus

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for kverus-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/asterinas/kverus/kverus-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/asterinas/kverus/kverus-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/asterinas/kverus/kverus-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/asterinas/kverus/kverus-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for kverus-review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/asterinas/kverus/kverus-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/asterinas/kverus/kverus-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 47 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 3,005 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00047 $0.03005
Opus 5 $0.00023 $0.01503
Sonnet 5 $0.00009 $0.00601
Haiku 4.5 $0.00005 $0.00300

Measured 6d ago against content hash dc2a96b039b4, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-10, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

kverus-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/kverus-review/SKILL.md · 290 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 290 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Review Verus code changes for exec semantics, =~= usage, and verification quality before committing.

Preferred invocation:

$kverus-review verify="<verification command>"
$kverus-review commit=abc1234 verify="<verification command>"

If verify is missing, ask for it and stop. commit is optional.

Objective

Check uncommitted changes (or changes since a given commit) for three categories of issues and produce a structured report:

  1. Exec code modifications and whether they change runtime semantics.
  2. New =~= introductions and whether they can be replaced by ==.
  3. Deleted comments and whether the deletion is justified.
  4. Verification pass/fail and problematic warnings.

Arguments

  • commit (optional): A git commit hash. When provided, review changes from that commit to HEAD. When omitted, review all uncommitted changes (unstaged + staged).
  • verify (required): The target repository's documented verification command.

Shared Verus References

Locate reference files under the kverus-common skill's references/ directory by topic:

Topic Reference File
Set / extensional equality / =~= vs == set-reasoning.md
Verus syntax / modes / exec-vs-spec-vs-proof verus-syntax-quickref.md
Ghost / tracked / erasure ghost-tracked.md
Verification error triage common-errors.md

When evaluating =~= usage, read the "Set Extensional Equality via Bidirectional Forall" section from the set-reasoning.md reference.

Required Workflow

Step 0: Collect Change Set

Determine the diff scope:

With commit argument:

# List changed .rs files
git diff <commit>..HEAD --name-only -- '*.rs'

# Get diff content for a specific file
git diff <commit>..HEAD -- <file>

Without commit argument:

# List changed .rs files (unstaged + staged)
git diff HEAD --name-only -- '*.rs'
git diff --cached --name-only -- '*.rs'

# Get diff content
git diff HEAD -- <file>
git diff --cached -- <file>

Read the full file on GitHub · 290 lines

Files

What ships with it

1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 6d ago Changed · +1 lines dc2a96b039b4
  2. 10d ago First seen · 289 lines · 47 tokens per session scan A 2ab80306253e

Subscribe to this mod's changes

kverus-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository asterinas/KVerus (24 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 47 tokens to every session and 3,005 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

requesting-code-review

Pre-commit review: security scan, quality gates, auto-fix.

NousResearch/hermes-agent · 20 tokens

continual-learning

Nightly refinement of an existing per-repo review-style prompt using this reviewer's own finding outcomes. Read confirmed (resolved-by-commit / thumbs-up) and dismissed (thumbs-down) findings, promote the bug patterns the team actually fixes, demote the false-positive patterns, reconcile against the current prompt…

langchain-ai/open-swe · 89 tokens

meta-codereview-current-diff

Read the current uncommitted diff, run three independent reviewers (safety + tests-coverage + style) in parallel, then arbitrate a single BLOCK / BLOCKWITHOVERRIDE / PASSWITHNOTES verdict. Use before commit when you want a multi-perspective second-opinion instead of a single-reviewer agent loop.

opensquilla/opensquilla · 73 tokens

prs-awaiting-maintainer

List open pull requests where the ball is in the maintainer's court: CI is green and the PR is ready for a maintainer to review, re-review, or merge. Use when the user wants to see PRs awaiting maintainer action.

dyoshikawa/rulesync · 56 tokens

compliance-checker

Check affiliate content for FTC compliance and platform rules. Triggers on: "check my content for compliance", "FTC disclosure check", "is this legal", "review for compliance", "check affiliate disclosure", "am I FTC compliant", "audit my content", "compliance review", "legal check", "platform rules check", "check…

Affitor/affiliate-skills · 87 tokens

lean-review

CocoLean diff-scoped over-engineering audit — scans uncommitted git diff and applies five classification tags (delete/stdlib/native/yagni/shrink) to identify unnecessary surface area before commit.

Snowflake-Labs/cocoplus · 44 tokens