Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add asteroid-belt/skulto --skill golang-cli-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/asteroid-belt/skultoWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/asteroid-belt/skulto/golang-cli-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/asteroid-belt/skulto/golang-cli-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/asteroid-belt/skulto/golang-cli-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/asteroid-belt/skulto/golang-cli-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/asteroid-belt/skulto/golang-cli-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00079 | $0.00716 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00039 | $0.00358 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00143 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00072 |
Grade A, and why
golang-cli-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- golang-cli-review — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 105 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Go CLI Code Review
Review Go CLI applications and produce an actionable checklist of findings.
Review Workflow
- Gather code - Read all Go files in the CLI project
- Analyze - Evaluate against review categories (see below)
- Produce checklist - Use template from references/review-checklist.md
Review Categories
Evaluate each area systematically:
CLI Structure & Framework
- Framework usage (prefer Cobra for complex CLIs)
- Command hierarchy and discoverability
- Help text quality with examples
- Version command following semver
Error Handling
- RunE vs Run (must return errors)
- Error wrapping with
%wand context - User-facing error actionability
- Meaningful exit codes (0=success, 1=error, 2=usage)
- No panics in normal paths
Flag & Argument Design
- Lowercase-kebab-case naming
- Short flags for common options (
-v,-o,-q) - Required flags marked and validated early
- Sensible defaults
- Clear descriptions
Input/Output
- stderr for errors/progress, stdout for data
- Machine-readable output support (
--json,--format) - Quiet and verbose mode support
- Non-TTY mode handling (no prompts)
Security
- Secrets via env vars or files, never flags
- Path traversal prevention
- No shell injection
- URL scheme validation
- No sensitive data in logs
Testing
- Command-level unit tests
- Error path coverage
- Integration tests for critical flows
Performance & Resources
- Context-based cancellation
- Signal handling (SIGINT/SIGTERM)
- Proper resource cleanup (defer)
- No goroutine leaks
Go Idioms
- Effective Go style compliance
- Immediate error handling
- Package naming conventions
- Interface/struct patterns
Reference Material
For patterns and examples, see references/cli-patterns.md.
Output Format
Use the checklist template from references/review-checklist.md:
## Critical Issues
- [ ] **[C1]** `file.go:123` - Description
- **Impact:** ...
- **Fix:** ...
## Warnings
- [ ] **[W1]** `file.go:45` - Description
- **Why:** ...
- **Fix:** ...
## Suggestions
- [ ] **[S1]** `file.go:78` - Description
- **Consider:** ...
## Positive Patterns
- **[P1]** `file.go:90` - What was done well
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 105 lines · 79 tokens per session scan A 0b9025aa3fb7
golang-cli-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository asteroid-belt/skulto (50 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 79 tokens to every session and 716 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
pr-to-go-linter
Generate a new pkg/linters analyzer from a merged or open PR pattern.
golang-refactoring
Golang refactoring — safe, at-scale restructuring of existing Go code: a coverage-adaptive safety net, behavior-preserving transforms (gopls Rename/Extract, gofmt -r, gopatch), the Fowler catalog mapped to Go, breaking import cycles, and small stacked PRs. Apply when a function or type has grown too large, a code…
sapcc-review
Gold-standard SAP CC Go code review: 10 parallel domain specialists.
go-concurrency-safety
L1 supplement - audits Go-specific concurrency hazards in node client code: map iteration non-determinism, goroutine leaks, mutex ordering, panic boundaries, context cancellation.
design-review
Deep design review of Go codebase — naming, structure, consistency, interfaces, error handling. Scores each dimension and provides actionable fixes.
agents-md
Generate AGENTS.md files for Go, Rust, TypeScript, and Java projects. Use this skill whenever the user asks to create, scaffold, bootstrap, update, or review an AGENTS.md (or agent-instructions, CLAUDE.md, repo guide for agents) file in a codebase. Also trigger when the user says "add AGENTS.md", "make this repo…