github-code-review

A guide for reviewing code changes with Git and, when needed, GitHub's command-line tools. It covers reviewing local changes before pushing and reviewing open pull requests, which are proposed code changes for others to inspect.

In plain words
What is it for?
Inspecting diffs, checking branches and commits, and reviewing local work or GitHub pull requests.
Why use it?
It helps find defects, unclear changes, and review issues before code is shared or merged.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/atlasomnia/hermes-custom-pack/github-code-review
Any agent
npx skills add AtlasOmnia/hermes-custom-pack --skill github-code-review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/AtlasOmnia/hermes-custom-pack

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Per session 22 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 3,840 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan C 2 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin 100% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00022 $0.03840
Opus 5 $0.00011 $0.01920
Sonnet 5 $0.00004 $0.00768
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00384

Measured 2d ago against content hash 32e9e1f1ec92, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade C, and why

github-code-review scanned grade C with 2 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Reaches for credential fileshighPrivilege escalation

SSH keys, cloud credentials, git-credentials, .npmrc, /etc/shadow: reading these is how a config file becomes a credential leak.

# Plaintext ~/.git-credentials is intentionally not used; prefer `gh auth login` or GITHUB_TOKEN in .env

Makes network callslowCapability

Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.

Perform code reviews on local changes before pushing, or review open PRs on GitHub. Most of this skill uses plain `git` — the `gh`/`curl` split only matters for PR-level interactions.
Origin

This is a copy

100% identical to github-code-review — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

skills/github-code-review/SKILL.md · 509 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 509 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

GitHub Code Review

Perform code reviews on local changes before pushing, or review open PRs on GitHub. Most of this skill uses plain git — the gh/curl split only matters for PR-level interactions.

Prerequisites

  • Authenticated with GitHub (see github-auth skill)
  • Inside a git repository

Setup (for PR interactions)

if command -v gh &>/dev/null && gh auth status &>/dev/null; then
 AUTH="gh"
else
 AUTH="git"
 if [ -z "$GITHUB_TOKEN" ]; then
 if [ -f ~/.hermes/.env ] && grep -q "^GITHUB_TOKEN=" ~/.hermes/.env; then
 GITHUB_TOKEN=$(grep "^GITHUB_TOKEN=" ~/.hermes/.env | head -1 | cut -d= -f2 | tr -d '\n\r')
# Plaintext ~/.git-credentials is intentionally not used; prefer `gh auth login` or GITHUB_TOKEN in .env
 fi
 fi
fi

REMOTE_URL=$(git remote get-url origin)
OWNER_REPO=$(echo "$REMOTE_URL" | sed -E 's|.*github\.com[:/]||; s|\.git$||')
OWNER=$(echo "$OWNER_REPO" | cut -d/ -f1)
REPO=$(echo "$OWNER_REPO" | cut -d/ -f2)

1. Reviewing Local Changes (Pre-Push)

This is pure git — works everywhere, no API needed.

Get the Diff

# Staged changes (what would be committed)
git diff --staged

# All changes vs main (what a PR would contain)
git diff main...HEAD

# File names only
git diff main...HEAD --name-only

# Stat summary (insertions/deletions per file)
git diff main...HEAD --stat

Review Strategy

  1. Get the big picture first:
git diff main...HEAD --stat
git log main..HEAD --oneline
  1. Review file by file — use read_file on changed files for full context, and the diff to see what changed:
git diff main...HEAD -- src/auth/login.py
  1. Check for common issues:
# Debug statements, TODOs, console.logs left behind
git diff main...HEAD | grep -n "print(\|console\.log\|TODO\|FIXME\|HACK\|XXX\|debugger"

# Large files accidentally staged
git diff main...HEAD --stat | sort -t'|' -k2 -rn | head -10

# Secrets or credential patterns
git diff main...HEAD | grep -in "password\|secret\|api_key\|token.*=\|private_key"

# Merge conflict markers
git diff main...HEAD | grep -n "<<<<<<\|>>>>>>\|======="

Read the full file on GitHub · 509 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 509 lines · 22 tokens per session scan C 32e9e1f1ec92

Subscribe to this mod's changes

github-code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository AtlasOmnia/hermes-custom-pack (55 stars, last pushed 18d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 22 tokens to every session and 3,840 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it C with 2 findings (reaches for credential files, makes network calls). It is 100% identical to github-code-review, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.