Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add AtlasOmnia/hermes-custom-pack --skill subagent-driven-developmentgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/AtlasOmnia/hermes-custom-packWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/atlasomnia/hermes-custom-pack/subagent-driven-development)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/atlasomnia/hermes-custom-pack/subagent-driven-development"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/atlasomnia/hermes-custom-pack/subagent-driven-development/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/atlasomnia/hermes-custom-pack/subagent-driven-development"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/atlasomnia/hermes-custom-pack/subagent-driven-development.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00022 | $0.06273 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.02509 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.01255 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00627 |
Grade A, and why
subagent-driven-development scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to subagent-driven-development — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 478 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Subagent-Driven Development
Overview
Execute implementation plans by dispatching fresh subagents per task with systematic two-stage review.
Core principle: Fresh subagent per task + two-stage review (spec then quality) = high quality, fast iteration.
When to Use
Use this skill when:
- You have an implementation plan (from writing-plans skill or user requirements)
- Tasks are mostly independent
- Quality and spec compliance are important
- You want automated review between tasks
vs. manual execution:
- Fresh context per task (no confusion from accumulated state)
- Automated review process catches issues early
- Consistent quality checks across all tasks
- Subagents can ask questions before starting work
The Process
1. Read, Parse, and Preflight the Plan
Read the plan file. Before dispatching implementation, audit it for internal contradictions and claims that cannot simultaneously hold—especially low-latency streaming versus authoritative final-channel precedence, bounded shutdown versus retained worker ownership, retry claims versus partial-stream replay safety, and install/public-link claims for artifacts not yet published. Correct the execution contract or explicitly document the tradeoff before production code begins.
For plans with streamed irreversible side effects (TTS, media, notifications, progressive writes), load during preflight.
Extract ALL tasks with their full text and context upfront. Create a todo list:
# Read the plan
read_file("docs/plans/feature-plan.md")
# Create todo list with all tasks
todo([
{"id": "task-1", "content": "Create User model with email field", "status": "pending"},
{"id": "task-2", "content": "Add password hashing utility", "status": "pending"},
{"id": "task-3", "content": "Create login endpoint", "status": "pending"},
])
Key: Read the plan ONCE. Extract everything. Don't make subagents read the plan file — provide the full task text directly in context.
2. Worker Transaction Contract
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 478 lines · 22 tokens per session scan A b98b53075fa8
subagent-driven-development is a skill published in the GitHub repository AtlasOmnia/hermes-custom-pack (72 stars, last pushed 12d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 22 tokens to every session and 6,273 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to subagent-driven-development, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
dx-roaster
Brutally honest developer-experience audit for a GitHub repo. Scores 10 DX dimensions (time-to-first-success, README clarity, visual proof, install, quick-start, docs, examples, community, trust, marketing), writes a shareable roast in the requested tone (brutal/honest/kind), produces a prioritized action plan ranked…
review-feedback
Address code review/PR comments: verify each, then fix.
pr-message-writer
Writes pull request messages with a technical summary, testing instructions, and verification queries, using customizable templates. Use when writing a PR description, preparing a pull request for review, or documenting changes for teammates.
php-quality
PHP static analysis, code style and modern idioms for PHP 8.3 to 8.5. Use when setting up phpstan.neon or a baseline, choosing PHPStan or Psalm, PHP-CS-Fixer or PHPCodeSniffer, PER-CS or PSR-12, configuring Rector quality sets, or reviewing PHP for readonly, enums, property hooks and the pipe operator.
solid
SOLID principles for object-oriented design, with violation detection, fixes, and trade-offs for each principle. Use to review class design, reduce coupling, or improve extensibility.
refactoring
Reference for 89 refactoring techniques and 22 code smells with mechanics and before/after examples. Use to detect smells, clean up technical debt, or choose a technique.