Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add atman-33/workhub --skill persona-commitgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/atman-33/workhubWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/atman-33/workhub/persona-commit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/atman-33/workhub/persona-commit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/atman-33/workhub/persona-commit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/atman-33/workhub/persona-commit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/atman-33/workhub/persona-commit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00054 | $0.00948 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00022 | $0.00379 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00190 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00095 |
Grade A, and why
persona-commit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Derived from genshijin (MIT, InterfaceX-co-jp) — https://github.com/InterfaceX-co-jp/genshijin
コミットメッセージは簡潔かつ正確に。Conventional Commits 形式。冗長禁止。「何を」より「なぜ」。
このスキルはキャラクター非依存。 コミットメッセージはリポジトリに残る文章なので、 どのキャラクターが有効でも口調を適用しない。
ルール
件名
<type>(<scope>): <命令形の要約>—<scope>は任意- types:
feat,fix,refactor,perf,docs,test,chore,build,ci,style,revert - 命令形にする。「追加」「修正」「削除」であって「追加した」「追加します」ではない
- 50文字を目標、72文字を上限とする
- 末尾のピリオドは不要
- 日本語か英語かはリポジトリの既存履歴に合わせる(
git logで確認)
本文(必要なときだけ)
- 件名で自明なら省略する
- 追加するのは次の場合:
- 非自明な「なぜ」
- 破壊的変更
- マイグレーションの注意
- 関連 Issue / PR
- 72文字で折り返す
- 箇条書きは
-を使う(*は使わない) - 末尾に参照を置く:
Closes #42/Refs #17
絶対に入れない
- 「このコミットは〜します」「私は」「我々は」「現在」「今」— diff を見れば自明
- 「〇〇の依頼により」—
Co-authored-bytrailer を使う - AI 帰属表記(プロジェクトの規約で必須な場合を除く)
- 絵文字(プロジェクトの慣習で必須な場合を除く)
- scope で既に示したファイル名の再記述
例
新しいエンドポイントの追加。なぜ必要かを本文で説明する場合:
-
不可:
feat: ユーザープロフィール情報をDBから取得する新しいエンドポイントを追加 -
可:
feat(api): GET /users/:id/profile 追加 モバイルクライアントのコールドスタート時、完全な user payload は不要。 LTE 帯域を削減するため profile だけを返すエンドポイントが必要。 Closes #128
破壊的な API 変更:
feat(api)!: /v1/orders を /v1/checkout にリネーム
BREAKING CHANGE: /v1/orders のクライアントは 2026-06-01 までに
/v1/checkout へ移行が必要。以降、旧ルートは 410 を返す。
小さなバグ修正(本文不要):
fix(auth): トークン期限チェックの境界条件を修正
本文が必須のケース
以下は件名だけで済ませない。将来のデバッガーが文脈を必要とするため、圧縮しすぎない。
- 破壊的変更
- セキュリティ修正
- データマイグレーション
- revert コミット
境界
- メッセージの生成のみ。
git commitの実行、ステージング、amend はしない - 出力はそのまま貼り付けられるコードブロック形式にする
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 90 lines · 54 tokens per session scan A 68adcad85c28
persona-commit is a skill published in the GitHub repository atman-33/workhub (3 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 54 tokens to every session and 948 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
git-commit
Generate well-formatted git commit messages following conventional commit standards.
branch-and-worktree-workflow
Isolates feature work in its own branch or worktree and integrates it cleanly when done. Use this when starting work that should not disturb the current workspace, when several efforts must proceed in parallel on one repository, or when implementation is finished and the change needs merging, rebasing, or splitting…
precommit
Pre-commit checks — lint:fix -> build -> test.
release
Bump a plugin's version, write a detailed changelog entry for the upgrade skill to consume, and commit+push. Takes a plugin slug argument identifying which plugin under plugins/ to release. Use this skill whenever the user says "release", "version bump", "cut a release", "changelog and push", or finishes a set of…
unslop-commit
Rewrites commit messages so they sound like a careful human engineer wrote them. Strips AI/marketing slop ("comprehensive solution", "robust implementation", "leverage", "enhance", "seamlessly", "This commit..."). Keeps Conventional Commits format. Subject ≤72 chars (aim ≤50), imperative mood. Body only when "why"…
commit
Changelog and commit — lightweight motion for day-to-day plugin dev work in the monorepo. One commit per plugin scope; CHANGELOG and staging routed by detected slug. Trigger when the user says "commit", "commit this", "save this", "wrap this up", "let's commit", or finishes a change and wants to capture it. NOT for…