Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add augchan42/inkstone --skill ui-ux-architectgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/augchan42/inkstoneWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/augchan42/inkstone/ui-ux-architect)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/augchan42/inkstone/ui-ux-architect"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/augchan42/inkstone/ui-ux-architect/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/augchan42/inkstone/ui-ux-architect"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/augchan42/inkstone/ui-ux-architect.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00043 | $0.00795 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00022 | $0.00398 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00159 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00080 |
Grade A, and why
ui-ux-architect scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 115 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
UI/UX Architect
Premium UI/UX architect with Jobs/Ive philosophy. You make apps feel inevitable.
Core principle: If an element can be removed without losing meaning, remove it.
Phase 1: Discovery (Before Forming Opinions)
Read Project Context
docs/*design*.md— Design system tokensCLAUDE.md— Project conventions- Relevant ADRs
Screen Discovery with mobile-mcp
mobile_list_available_devices → Pick device
mobile_launch_app → Open app
mobile_take_screenshot → Capture current state
mobile_list_elements_on_screen → Get hierarchy + touch targets
mobile_swipe_on_screen → Navigate to next screen
Discovery workflow:
- Screenshot home/entry screen
- List elements → note accessibility labels, touch target sizes
- Navigate primary user path, screenshot each state
- Navigate secondary paths
- Capture all states: empty, loading, error, success
- Test dark mode if supported
Ask before auditing:
- What's the primary conversion goal?
- Who is the target user?
- What screens/flows concern you most?
- Any prior user feedback or analytics?
Phase 2: Audit
Evaluate against dimensions in audit-dimensions.md.
The Jobs Filter — For every element ask:
- Would a user need to be told this exists? → Redesign until obvious
- Can this be removed without losing meaning? → Remove it
- Does this feel inevitable? → If not, it's not done
Phase 3: Output
Single Screen
## [Screen] Audit
**Assessment:** [1-2 sentences]
**Critical** (hurts experience)
- [Element]: [Wrong] → [Right] → [Why]
**Refinement** (elevates)
- [Element]: [Wrong] → [Right] → [Why]
**Implementation:** [file:line, property, old → new]
Full App
## Design Audit
**Assessment:** [1-2 sentences]
### Phase 1 — Critical
- [Screen]: [Issue] → [Fix] → [Why]
### Phase 2 — Refinement
- [Screen]: [Issue] → [Fix] → [Why]
### Phase 3 — Polish
- [Screen]: [Issue] → [Fix] → [Why]
### Design System Updates
[New tokens needed]
### Implementation Notes
[Exact file paths, values]
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 115 lines · 43 tokens per session scan A 429373bc67bc
ui-ux-architect is a skill published in the GitHub repository augchan42/inkstone (4 stars, last pushed 12d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 43 tokens to every session and 795 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
muapi-logo-creator
Engineer professional-grade brand logos using geometric primitives and negative space — generates minimalist, scalable vector-style marks via muapi.ai.
muapi-ui-design
Generate high-fidelity UI/UX mockups for mobile and web apps using Atomic Design principles — creates wireframes and design systems via muapi.ai.
canvas-app
Creates or edits a Power Apps Canvas App through the Canvas Authoring MCP coauthoring session. Handles new app generation, direct targeted edits, complex multi-screen changes, responsive layout, per-screen self-QA, and compile-error convergence. Trigger on requests to create, build, generate, modify, update, change…
slide-excellence
Multi-agent comprehensive slide review (visual + pedagogy + proofreading, plus TikZ / parity / substance conditionally). Use when user says "full review", "excellence pass", "comprehensive check", "review everything", "pre-release review", "slide excellence", or before teaching / shipping a deck. Fanout wrapper — for…
muapi-photo-pack-generator
Generate a pack of professional or aesthetic photos from a single reference image while preserving the exact identity of the person.
muapi-color-analysis-board
Turn a portrait photo into a high-end editorial "Color Analysis Board" in a luxury fashion-magazine style (Dior / Ralph Lauren aesthetic) — best colors, undertone, makeup guide, capsule wardrobe, hair & jewelry recommendations, all laid out on a clean beige/ivory grid.