verification

verification is a skill for Claude Code from Aurite-ai/agent-verifier. It costs 41 tokens per session (1,894 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A complete checking routine for AI agents. It combines checks for security, common agent patterns, code quality, and language-specific practices, while keeping the analysis on your computer.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to verify or audit an agent, check compliance, or run the full verification suite.
Why use it?
It provides one review of several risk areas instead of requiring separate checks. It helps identify problems in agent code before it is used or shared.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin.

Part of the agent-verifier plugin — 5 skills shipped together

Good fit Use it to verify or audit an agent, check compliance, or run the full verification suite.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/aurite-ai/agent-verifier/verification
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add Aurite-ai/agent-verifier --skill verification
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Aurite-ai/agent-verifier

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install agent-verifier, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 5 skills.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for verification

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aurite-ai/agent-verifier/verification/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/aurite-ai/agent-verifier/verification)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aurite-ai/agent-verifier/verification"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aurite-ai/agent-verifier/verification/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for verification

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aurite-ai/agent-verifier/verification"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aurite-ai/agent-verifier/verification.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 41 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,894 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00041 $0.01894
Opus 5.5 $0.00016 $0.00758
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00008 $0.00379
Haiku 4.5 $0.00004 $0.00189

Measured 8d ago against content hash 772a15c03893, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

verification scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/verification/SKILL.md · 268 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 268 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Agent Verifier

Purpose

Run comprehensive verification on AI agent code. This orchestrator invokes focused verification skills and consolidates results into a unified report. No telemetry or network calls of its own; the code is processed by the host coding agent and its model provider.

When to Use

Trigger this skill when the user asks to:

  • "verify agent" (primary invocation)
  • "verify my agent"
  • "audit agent"
  • "full verification"
  • "verify my code" (when agent patterns are detected)
  • "check compliance"

Available Verification Modes

Command Skill What it checks
"verify agent" This skill Full suite (all below)
"verify agent security" verify-security Secrets, dependencies, input validation
"verify agent patterns" verify-patterns Loops, retries, tools, context size
"verify agent quality" verify-quality Naming, organization, documentation
"verify agent language" verify-language Type hints, idioms, language best practices

Process

Step 1: Context Discovery

Scan the project to identify:

  1. Primary language:

    • Check for pyproject.toml, package.json, go.mod
    • Look at file extensions in src/ or project root
  2. Agent framework (if any):

    • langgraph in imports → LangGraph
    • crewai in imports → CrewAI
    • autogen in imports → AutoGen
    • langchain in imports → LangChain
    • Direct SDK usage → Custom agent
  3. Kahuna integration:

    • Check if .kahuna/ directory exists
    • If yes, read .kahuna/context-guide.md for organizational rules

Record the detected context for reporting.

Step 2: Run Security Checks

Load the verify-security skill and execute its process.

This checks for:

  • Hardcoded secrets and API keys
  • Dependency version pinning
  • Input validation patterns
  • Error message exposure
  • Secure defaults

Record all findings.

Step 3: Run Pattern Checks

Load the verify-patterns skill and execute its process.

Read the full file on GitHub · 268 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 8d ago Changed 772a15c03893
  2. 1mo ago First seen · 268 lines · 41 tokens per session scan A 0dc40022fb17

Subscribe to this mod's changes

verification is a skill published in the GitHub repository Aurite-ai/agent-verifier (45 stars, last pushed 9d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 41 tokens to every session and 1,894 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

Unit Test Improver

Reviews existing unit tests for gaps, weak assertions, and missing edge cases, then rewrites them to be more robust.

Notysoty/openagentskills · 29 tokens

chrome-cdp

Drive a headless Chrome over the Chrome DevTools Protocol (CDP) for browser QA — navigate, click, fill forms, read the DOM/accessibility tree, screenshot, and assert. Use whenever a task requires loading a web page and interacting with it like a user. Chrome is launched by a bash step (recipe below); this skill…

mattzcarey/shippie · 91 tokens

brooks-sweep

Full-sweep mode: runs a unified analysis across all quality dimensions — code decay, architecture, tech debt, and test quality — then applies fixes directly to the codebase. Safe changes are auto-applied; risky changes are confirmed before execution. Drawing on twelve classic engineering books. Triggers when: user…

hyhmrright/brooks-lint · 178 tokens

fable-judge

Adversarial verification of finished work. Treats any "done" as a set of claims, then re-runs the claimed verifications, diffs what actually changed, detects weakened tests and false completion claims, and delivers an evidence-based verdict (VERIFIED / VERIFIED WITH CAVEATS / REFUTED). Use after any agent or model…

Sahir619/fable-method · 124 tokens

brooks-health

Combined codebase health dashboard that scores a project across all four quality dimensions — PR quality, architecture, tech debt, and test quality — in a single pass, drawing on twelve classic engineering books. Triggers when: user wants an overall quality assessment, asks "how healthy is this codebase?", "run all…

hyhmrright/brooks-lint · 156 tokens

brooks-test

Test quality review drawing on twelve classic engineering books — with primary focus on xUnit Test Patterns, The Art of Unit Testing, How Google Tests Software, and Working Effectively with Legacy Code — that diagnoses structural problems in an existing test suite: brittleness, mock abuse, coverage illusions, slow…

hyhmrright/brooks-lint · 161 tokens