Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Aurite-ai/agent-verifier --skill verificationgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Aurite-ai/agent-verifierWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/aurite-ai/agent-verifier/verification)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aurite-ai/agent-verifier/verification"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aurite-ai/agent-verifier/verification/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aurite-ai/agent-verifier/verification"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aurite-ai/agent-verifier/verification.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00041 | $0.01894 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00758 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00379 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00189 |
Grade A, and why
verification scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 268 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Agent Verifier
Purpose
Run comprehensive verification on AI agent code. This orchestrator invokes focused verification skills and consolidates results into a unified report. No telemetry or network calls of its own; the code is processed by the host coding agent and its model provider.
When to Use
Trigger this skill when the user asks to:
- "verify agent" (primary invocation)
- "verify my agent"
- "audit agent"
- "full verification"
- "verify my code" (when agent patterns are detected)
- "check compliance"
Available Verification Modes
| Command | Skill | What it checks |
|---|---|---|
| "verify agent" | This skill | Full suite (all below) |
| "verify agent security" | verify-security | Secrets, dependencies, input validation |
| "verify agent patterns" | verify-patterns | Loops, retries, tools, context size |
| "verify agent quality" | verify-quality | Naming, organization, documentation |
| "verify agent language" | verify-language | Type hints, idioms, language best practices |
Process
Step 1: Context Discovery
Scan the project to identify:
-
Primary language:
- Check for
pyproject.toml,package.json,go.mod - Look at file extensions in
src/or project root
- Check for
-
Agent framework (if any):
langgraphin imports → LangGraphcrewaiin imports → CrewAIautogenin imports → AutoGenlangchainin imports → LangChain- Direct SDK usage → Custom agent
-
Kahuna integration:
- Check if
.kahuna/directory exists - If yes, read
.kahuna/context-guide.mdfor organizational rules
- Check if
Record the detected context for reporting.
Step 2: Run Security Checks
Load the verify-security skill and execute its process.
This checks for:
- Hardcoded secrets and API keys
- Dependency version pinning
- Input validation patterns
- Error message exposure
- Secure defaults
Record all findings.
Step 3: Run Pattern Checks
Load the verify-patterns skill and execute its process.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago Changed 772a15c03893
- 1mo ago First seen · 268 lines · 41 tokens per session scan A 0dc40022fb17
verification is a skill published in the GitHub repository Aurite-ai/agent-verifier (45 stars, last pushed 9d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 41 tokens to every session and 1,894 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
Unit Test Improver
Reviews existing unit tests for gaps, weak assertions, and missing edge cases, then rewrites them to be more robust.
chrome-cdp
Drive a headless Chrome over the Chrome DevTools Protocol (CDP) for browser QA — navigate, click, fill forms, read the DOM/accessibility tree, screenshot, and assert. Use whenever a task requires loading a web page and interacting with it like a user. Chrome is launched by a bash step (recipe below); this skill…
brooks-sweep
Full-sweep mode: runs a unified analysis across all quality dimensions — code decay, architecture, tech debt, and test quality — then applies fixes directly to the codebase. Safe changes are auto-applied; risky changes are confirmed before execution. Drawing on twelve classic engineering books. Triggers when: user…
fable-judge
Adversarial verification of finished work. Treats any "done" as a set of claims, then re-runs the claimed verifications, diffs what actually changed, detects weakened tests and false completion claims, and delivers an evidence-based verdict (VERIFIED / VERIFIED WITH CAVEATS / REFUTED). Use after any agent or model…
brooks-health
Combined codebase health dashboard that scores a project across all four quality dimensions — PR quality, architecture, tech debt, and test quality — in a single pass, drawing on twelve classic engineering books. Triggers when: user wants an overall quality assessment, asks "how healthy is this codebase?", "run all…
brooks-test
Test quality review drawing on twelve classic engineering books — with primary focus on xUnit Test Patterns, The Art of Unit Testing, How Google Tests Software, and Working Effectively with Legacy Code — that diagnoses structural problems in an existing test suite: brittleness, mock abuse, coverage illusions, slow…