Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/aurite-ai/agent-verifier/verify-qualitynpx skills add Aurite-ai/agent-verifier --skill verify-qualitygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Aurite-ai/agent-verifierWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/aurite-ai/agent-verifier/verify-quality)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aurite-ai/agent-verifier/verify-quality"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aurite-ai/agent-verifier/verify-quality.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00038 | $0.02045 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00019 | $0.01022 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00409 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00204 |
Grade A, and why
verify-quality scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
response = requests.get(f"{BASE_URL}/users/{user_id}") How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 354 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Code Quality Verification
Purpose
Verify code for quality anti-patterns including poor naming, missing documentation, magic values, and organizational issues. All analysis happens locally.
When to Use
Trigger this skill when the user asks to:
- "verify agent quality"
- "verify quality"
- "check code quality"
- "review code organization"
- "check naming conventions"
Note: For full verification including security, patterns, and language-specific checks, tell the user to say "verify agent".
Process
Step 1: Discover Files
Locate files to analyze:
Source files:
*.py,*.ts,*.js,*.go,*.rs- Source code- Focus on main implementation files, not tests
Directories to check:
src/,lib/,app/, project rootagent/,tools/,utils/
Exclude:
node_modules/,.venv/,venv/,__pycache__/- Test files (
*.test.*,*.spec.*,*_test.go) - Generated files, migrations
Step 2: Run Quality Checks
All checks in this skill are [HEURISTIC] — they require judgment. Tag findings with [H].
2.1 [HEURISTIC] Naming Conventions
Check for:
| Issue | Examples |
|---|---|
| Single-letter variables (except loops) | x = get_data(), d = {} |
| Unclear abbreviations | proc_usr_req(), calc_val() |
| Inconsistent casing | Mixing camelCase and snake_case in same file |
| Names that don't describe purpose | data, temp, result, info |
| Boolean names without is/has/can | enabled = check() vs is_enabled = check() |
Good naming:
# ✅ Clear, descriptive
user_profile = get_user_profile(user_id)
is_authenticated = check_authentication(token)
max_retry_attempts = 3
# ⚠️ Unclear
x = get_up(uid)
auth = check(t)
n = 3
Severity: ⚠️ Warning
2.2 [HEURISTIC] Code Organization
Check for:
| Issue | Description |
|---|---|
| Large files | > 500 lines for a single module |
| Large functions | > 50 lines for a single function |
| Deep nesting | > 4 levels of indentation |
| Mixed concerns | Business logic mixed with I/O in same function |
| God objects | Classes with > 10 public methods or > 20 attributes |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 354 lines · 38 tokens per session scan A 43161a11a910
verify-quality is a skill published in the GitHub repository Aurite-ai/agent-verifier (44 stars, last pushed 9d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 38 tokens to every session and 2,045 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
procoder
Work like a senior developer in a repository governed by procoder: run the commit gate before calling anything done, format and lint through the binary, and drive the spec, plan, todo, backlog, and sprint chain in .procoder/. Use this skill when the repository contains a .procoder/ directory or an AGENTS.md naming…
Tech Debt Auditor
Identifies and prioritizes technical debt in a codebase with an effort/impact matrix.
Unit Test Improver
Reviews existing unit tests for gaps, weak assertions, and missing edge cases, then rewrites them to be more robust.
quality
This skill should be used when the user asks about "code quality", "formatting", "linting", "lint rules", "code style", "error handling", "unsafe code", "documentation comments", "doc comments", "rustfmt", "prettier", "eslint", "clippy", or needs guidance on code quality enforcement and configuration.
pr-review
Use when conducting manual PR reviews - provides structured checklist covering security, performance, maintainability, and code quality dimensions with anti-sycophancy principles.
receiving-code-review
Use when receiving PR review feedback or code review comments. Enforces verification-first response to review feedback with anti-sycophancy classification and constructive disagreement protocol.