Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add austin-starks/Public-Portfolio-Challenge --skill options-structure-rulesgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/austin-starks/Public-Portfolio-ChallengeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/austin-starks/public-portfolio-challenge/options-structure-rules)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/austin-starks/public-portfolio-challenge/options-structure-rules"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/austin-starks/public-portfolio-challenge/options-structure-rules/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/austin-starks/public-portfolio-challenge/options-structure-rules"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/austin-starks/public-portfolio-challenge/options-structure-rules.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00096 | $0.01207 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00048 | $0.00603 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00241 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00121 |
Grade A, and why
options-structure-rules scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 84 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Options Structure Rules
The options structure family is settled by episode evidence — only the signal (ranking / weighting / filtering) is normally in play. These are hard constraints; a violation is an automatic certification FAIL.
The spread-shape rule (hard constraint)
- Long-dated exposure (≥ ~120 DTE) = outright long calls ONLY. Uncapped convexity, no short leg. No long-dated debit or vertical spreads (e.g. a Mar-'27 ATM/+3/+10/+20 capped vertical is a violation and cannot certify).
- Any debit / vertical spread must be short-dated — expiring in ≤ ~30 DTE. Thin is fine there.
Re-confirm compliance on every finalist by reading leg DTE/strikes from get_portfolio. Violation =
automatic FAIL, no exceptions.
Short-dated verticals are candidates, not banned
A prior thin +3%-wide, uncapped, every-name-eligible ≤30-DTE sleeve FAILED cert (theta bleed, fee churn, cratered the April-2025 fold). That disproved one point, not the class. A short-dated wide, share-capped debit spread is a different structure — let the sweep + OOS cert adjudicate it, but instrument it so the failure mode can't hide: width is a gene, sleeve share is a capped gene, and it must clear the same OOS gates plus a turnover/fee guardrail (report per-fold fees + turnover + sleeve share; a prior sleeve ballooned fees to $1.5–8.9k/fold vs the incumbent's ~$100–600 and must survive the April-2025 fold).
The settled structure family
Outright-calls-only momentum-LEAP: a 7-rung deep-OTM ladder (ATM / +10 / +20 / +35 / +50 / +75 / +100% OTM, 365–730 DTE), TP +250%, affordability backfill, SelectTop 21. Alt-data may touch the rank signal, entry filters, per-name tilts, or an overlay condition — never the structure rungs, the spread-shape rule, or the universe.
The take-profit convexity-cap footgun
If multiple "always" take-profit closes exist (e.g. P/L ≥ 20% / 50% / 200%), the lowest one binds first and effectively caps every winner at ~+20% — defeating the uncapped-convexity rationale for outright calls. It is the single most likely reason returns trail a let-winners-run book. Sanity-check the exit ladder for this on any live book; the deploy config uses a single high TP (e.g. +250%) or none.
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 84 lines · 96 tokens per session scan A 07053b3b698a
options-structure-rules is a skill published in the GitHub repository austin-starks/Public-Portfolio-Challenge (44 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 96 tokens to every session and 1,207 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
tushare
A Python interface for Tushare, a financial data service that provides market and company information for stocks, funds, futures, and digital assets. It returns queried data as pandas tables.
correlation-analysis
Correlation and cointegration analysis — co-movement discovery, deep return-correlation analysis, sector clustering, realized correlation, Engle-Granger / Johansen cointegration, half-life, Kalman dynamic hedge ratio, cross-market linkage analysis, and pair-trading signal generation.
social-media-intelligence
Social media intelligence: financial signal extraction from Twitter/X, Telegram, Discord, and Reddit for sentiment-driven trading strategies.
ashare-pre-st-filter
An A-share China stock risk checker that forecasts whether a company may receive an ST or *ST warning in the next financial year. ST labels are Chinese exchange warnings for companies facing specified financial or regulatory problems.
credit-analysis
A guide to analysing bonds and other fixed-income investments, including issuer credit quality, interest payments, default risk, credit spreads, and convertible bonds. It also covers Chinese fixed-income markets and local-government financing bonds.
etf-analysis
A framework for comparing exchange-traded funds (ETFs), which are funds bought and sold on a stock exchange and usually track an index, industry, asset, or strategy. It covers fees, how closely an ETF follows its target, trading activity, and portfolio use.