Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add automateyournetwork/netclaw --skill azure-security-auditgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/automateyournetwork/netclawWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/automateyournetwork/netclaw/azure-security-audit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/automateyournetwork/netclaw/azure-security-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/automateyournetwork/netclaw/azure-security-audit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/automateyournetwork/netclaw/azure-security-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/automateyournetwork/netclaw/azure-security-audit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00057 | $0.01000 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00028 | $0.00500 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00200 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00100 |
Grade A, and why
azure-security-audit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 88 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Azure Security Audit
MCP Server
- Server: azure-network-mcp (shared with azure-network-ops)
- Command:
python mcp-servers/azure-network-mcp/azure_network_mcp_server.py(stdio transport) - Requires:
AZURE_TENANT_ID,AZURE_CLIENT_ID,AZURE_CLIENT_SECRET,AZURE_SUBSCRIPTION_ID - Read-only: All operations are observation-only
Relevant Tools
Primary Audit Tools
| Tool | What It Does |
|---|---|
azure_audit_nsg_compliance |
Run CIS Azure Foundations Benchmark against all or specific NSGs |
azure_list_nsgs |
List all NSGs with orphan detection (no subnet/NIC associations) |
azure_get_nsg_rules |
Full rule list sorted by priority for a specific NSG |
azure_get_effective_security_rules |
Effective aggregated rules on a NIC (all NSGs combined) |
Supporting Context Tools
| Tool | What It Does |
|---|---|
azure_get_network_watcher_status |
Flow log configuration and retention checks |
azure_get_vnet_details |
Subnet-to-NSG associations for VNet topology context |
azure_list_firewalls |
Azure Firewall policies for layered security context |
CIS Azure Foundations Benchmark Rules
The compliance audit checks these rules from the CIS Azure Foundations Benchmark:
| Rule | Severity | What It Checks |
|---|---|---|
| 6.1 | Critical | RDP (port 3389) not open to 0.0.0.0/0 from internet |
| 6.2 | Critical | SSH (port 22) not open to 0.0.0.0/0 from internet |
| 6.3 | High | No unrestricted UDP (all ports) from internet |
| 6.4 | Medium | NSG flow logs enabled with >= 90 day retention |
Workflow: Full NSG Compliance Audit
When asked "audit NSG compliance" or "check Azure security posture":
- Discover:
azure_list_nsgs-- get all NSGs, note orphaned ones - Audit:
azure_audit_nsg_compliance-- run CIS checks against all NSGs - Deep dive: For each Critical/High finding:
azure_get_nsg_rules-- review the full rule set for context- Identify which subnets/NICs are affected via associations
- Effective rules: For critical NICs:
azure_get_effective_security_rules-- verify aggregated effective rules
- Flow logs:
azure_get_network_watcher_status-- check flow log coverage - Report: Summarize by severity, list affected resources, provide remediation steps
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 88 lines · 57 tokens per session scan A d5e9f276d786
azure-security-audit is a skill published in the GitHub repository automateyournetwork/netclaw (652 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 57 tokens to every session and 1,000 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
implementing-aws-security-hub-compliance
Implementing AWS Security Hub to aggregate security findings across AWS accounts, enable compliance standards like CIS AWS Foundations and PCI DSS, configure automated remediation with EventBridge and Lambda, and create custom security insights for organizational risk management.
performing-kubernetes-cis-benchmark-with-kube-bench
Audit Kubernetes cluster security posture against CIS benchmarks using kube-bench with automated checks for control plane, worker nodes, and RBAC.
azure-review
Performs an Azure security posture review against the CIS Microsoft Azure Foundations Benchmark v2.1.0. Auto-invoked when reviewing Azure infrastructure, Entra ID configurations, NSG rules, Defender for Cloud settings, or Key Vault access policies. Walks through all nine benchmark sections, evaluates each…
implementing-aws-security-hub-compliance
Implementing AWS Security Hub to aggregate security findings across AWS accounts, enable compliance standards like CIS AWS Foundations and PCI DSS, configure automated remediation with EventBridge and Lambda, and create custom security insights for organizational risk management.
performing-kubernetes-cis-benchmark-with-kube-bench
Audit Kubernetes cluster security posture against CIS benchmarks using kube-bench with automated checks for control plane, worker nodes, and RBAC.
Aws Compliance Checker
Automated compliance checking against CIS, PCI-DSS, HIPAA, and SOC 2 benchmarks.