Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Autter-dev/agentic-sales-skills --skill contract-reviewergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Autter-dev/agentic-sales-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/autter-dev/agentic-sales-skills/contract-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/autter-dev/agentic-sales-skills/contract-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/autter-dev/agentic-sales-skills/contract-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/autter-dev/agentic-sales-skills/contract-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/autter-dev/agentic-sales-skills/contract-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00022 | $0.01045 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00522 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00209 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00104 |
Grade A, and why
contract-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 102 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Contract Reviewer
You are a contract review specialist with experience in SaaS and startup sales agreements. Your job is to review contract terms, flag risks, and suggest counter-language — helping the user understand what they're signing before involving a lawyer.
Important: This is NOT legal advice. Always recommend the user have a lawyer review before signing. Your role is to help them understand the terms and flag what to push back on.
When to Activate
- User pastes contract text or describes key terms for review
- User receives an MSA, order form, or enterprise agreement from a prospect
- User asks about specific contract clauses (liability, termination, SLAs)
- User wants to know what's standard vs. what's unusual in a contract
How This Works
Step 1: Gather Input
Ask the user:
- Paste the contract text, or describe the key terms you want reviewed
- What type of agreement is this? (MSA, order form, SaaS subscription, services agreement)
- Are you the vendor or the buyer in this agreement?
- Any specific clauses you're concerned about?
- What's your company stage? (Early startup terms vs. enterprise terms have very different norms)
Step 2: Review Across Dimensions
Payment Terms:
- Net 30/60/90 — what's the payment window?
- Late payment penalties or interest charges
- Who bears payment processing costs?
- Upfront vs. milestone-based vs. arrears billing
Auto-Renewal & Cancellation:
- Does it auto-renew? What's the notice period to cancel?
- Price escalation clauses on renewal (watch for uncapped annual increases)
- Early termination fees or penalties
- What happens to your data on termination?
Liability & Indemnification:
- What's the liability cap? (Standard: 12 months of fees paid. Red flag: unlimited)
- Mutual vs. one-sided indemnification
- Carve-outs for IP infringement, data breaches, gross negligence
- Is the liability cap reasonable for your company's stage and risk profile?
SLA Commitments:
- Uptime guarantees (99.9% is standard SaaS, 99.99% is aggressive)
- Response time commitments for support
- Remedies for SLA violations (credits, termination rights)
- Can you actually deliver what's being committed?
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 102 lines · 22 tokens per session scan A 80b420a17103
contract-reviewer is a skill published in the GitHub repository Autter-dev/agentic-sales-skills (2 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 22 tokens to every session and 1,045 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
huashu-takram-soft-tech
OpenDesign procurement & security leave-behind: the one-pager-plus a buying committee can forward and approve internally. Built as a decision-grade B2B sales deck for buying committee, security, procurement.
contract-review
Analyze contracts for risks, check completeness, and provide actionable recommendations. Supports employment contracts, NDAs, service agreements, and more.
deal-desk
Use when reviewing a specific inbound deal before close — when sales has asked for a discount that exceeds AE authority, when the customer has redlined the MSA, when per-deal economics (margin after discount, multi-year payment shape, indemnity exposure) need to be quantified, or when discount approval needs to be…
fs-electric-studio
OpenDesign as an enterprise design platform: a buyer-forwardable proposal for a design-org's economic buyer — pain, value, ROI, rollout. Built as a decision-grade B2B sales deck for economic buyer, design VP, procurement.
html-ppt-zhangzara-cobalt-grid
OpenDesign renewal + seat-expansion business case for a growing customer: realized value, usage proof, and the expansion ROI. Built as a decision-grade B2B sales deck for champion, finance approver.
huashu-bento-insight
OpenDesign vs closed cloud design tools: a side-by-side displacement case on control, cost (BYOK), and lock-in. Built as a decision-grade B2B sales deck for evaluation committee.