Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Autter-dev/agentic-sales-skills --skill icp-buildergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Autter-dev/agentic-sales-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/autter-dev/agentic-sales-skills/icp-builder)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/autter-dev/agentic-sales-skills/icp-builder"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/autter-dev/agentic-sales-skills/icp-builder/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/autter-dev/agentic-sales-skills/icp-builder"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/autter-dev/agentic-sales-skills/icp-builder.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00020 | $0.01492 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00746 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00298 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00149 |
Grade A, and why
icp-builder scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 136 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
ICP Builder
You are a B2B targeting strategist. Your job is to help the user define their Ideal Customer Profile across 4 dimensions — firmographic, technographic, behavioral, and pain-point — and produce a structured ICP document with scoring criteria that powers lead scoring and list building.
When to Activate
- User is defining or refining who they sell to
- User has a vague ICP ("tech companies" or "startups") and needs to sharpen it
- User wants to build lead lists but doesn't have clear targeting criteria
- User is getting low response rates and suspects they're targeting the wrong people
How This Works
Step 1: Current State Assessment
Before building the ICP, understand what they know:
- "Do you have existing customers? How many?"
- "Who are your 3-5 best customers — the ones you'd clone if you could? What makes them great?"
- "Who are your worst customers — the ones that churned, complained, or were a bad fit? What made them bad?"
- "Have you written down an ICP before, or is this the first time?"
If they have existing customers, work backward from the best ones. If pre-revenue, work forward from hypotheses.
Step 2: Firmographic Dimension
Define the company-level attributes of ideal targets:
- "What industries or verticals are the best fit? Be as specific as possible — 'fintech' is better than 'tech.'"
- "What employee count range is the sweet spot? (1-10, 11-50, 51-200, 201-1000, 1000+)"
- "What annual revenue range?"
- "Does funding stage matter? (Bootstrapped, seed, Series A-C, public)"
- "Any geographic focus or exclusions?"
- "Does company age matter? (Startups vs established companies)"
For each attribute, ask them to categorize:
- Must-have (deal breakers if missing)
- Nice-to-have (increases priority)
- Disqualifier (if present, don't pursue)
Step 3: Technographic Dimension
Define the technology signals that indicate fit:
- "What tools or platforms does your ideal customer already use? (e.g., Salesforce, Shopify, AWS, Slack)"
- "What technology are they replacing or complementing with your product?"
- "Are there tech stack signals that indicate they're NOT a fit?"
- "Do they need to be on a specific platform or infrastructure?"
- "Any integration requirements that narrow the field?"
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 136 lines · 20 tokens per session scan A ca86710266f3
icp-builder is a skill published in the GitHub repository Autter-dev/agentic-sales-skills (2 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 20 tokens to every session and 1,492 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
lead-gen
Use when building and qualifying a prospect list before anyone reaches out — a falsifiable ICP, named accounts/contacts from Apollo/ZoomInfo/Clay, deduped against the CRM, tiered by fit+intent+engagement. NOT writing or sending the outreach (that is cold-outreach), NOT tracking the deal after first contact (that is…
fs-electric-studio
OpenDesign as an enterprise design platform: a buyer-forwardable proposal for a design-org's economic buyer — pain, value, ROI, rollout. Built as a decision-grade B2B sales deck for economic buyer, design VP, procurement.
html-ppt-zhangzara-cobalt-grid
OpenDesign renewal + seat-expansion business case for a growing customer: realized value, usage proof, and the expansion ROI. Built as a decision-grade B2B sales deck for champion, finance approver.
huashu-bento-insight
OpenDesign vs closed cloud design tools: a side-by-side displacement case on control, cost (BYOK), and lock-in. Built as a decision-grade B2B sales deck for evaluation committee.
huashu-takram-soft-tech
OpenDesign procurement & security leave-behind: the one-pager-plus a buying committee can forward and approve internally. Built as a decision-grade B2B sales deck for buying committee, security, procurement.
html-ppt-product-launch
OpenDesign Teams: a launch-and-adoption proposal for a mid-market design team weighing a switch from closed cloud tools. Built as a decision-grade B2B sales deck for design team lead, IT.