Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add auzroz/ynab-mcp --skill ynab-debt-payoff-plannergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/auzroz/ynab-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/auzroz/ynab-mcp/ynab-debt-payoff-planner)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/auzroz/ynab-mcp/ynab-debt-payoff-planner"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/auzroz/ynab-mcp/ynab-debt-payoff-planner/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/auzroz/ynab-mcp/ynab-debt-payoff-planner"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/auzroz/ynab-mcp/ynab-debt-payoff-planner.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00087 | $0.00875 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00044 | $0.00438 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00175 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00088 |
Grade A, and why
ynab-debt-payoff-planner scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 91 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
YNAB Debt Payoff Planner
What this does
Builds a sustainable debt-payoff plan grounded in YNAB's own recommended sequencing — cover monthly expenses, save for non-monthly true expenses, then attack one debt at a time — because paying debt aggressively while skipping the true-expenses buffer is the most common cause of relapsing back into new debt. Also walks through Debt Snowball vs. Debt Avalanche.
When to use this skill
- "Help me pay off my credit cards"
- "Snowball or avalanche, which should I do?"
- "How do I set up a debt goal?"
- "I keep going into debt for emergencies while paying off debt"
- "What order should I attack my debts?"
Should NOT trigger on: fixing already-overspent categories this month
(use ynab-overspending-triage), or funding non-debt irregular costs (use
ynab-true-expenses).
Workflow
Step 1: Explain the sequencing
Before picking a strategy, confirm the foundation is in place: monthly expenses covered, and at least a starter true-expenses buffer, before throwing extra money at debt. Attacking debt without this buffer is why many people end up back in debt the moment a car repair or medical bill hits.
Step 2: Choose a strategy
Present both, with YNAB's own stance:
- Debt Snowball (smallest balance first) — YNAB's own recommended default, "with a gold star," because paying off a full balance quickly creates psychological momentum that keeps people going.
- Debt Avalanche (highest interest rate first) — mathematically optimal (saves more in total interest), valid if the person is more motivated by the math than by quick wins. Let the person pick; both are legitimate.
Step 3 (if MCP-connected): Ground it in real numbers
Call MCP tool: ynab_list_categories and ynab_get_category — to see current debt category balances
Call MCP tool: ynab_goal_progress — to check DEBT-type goal progress (YNAB's DEBT goal type is a per-category payoff target that pairs with either strategy)
Step 4: Set the plan
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 91 lines · 87 tokens per session scan A 947e2e37d4c6
ynab-debt-payoff-planner is a skill published in the GitHub repository auzroz/ynab-mcp (3 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 87 tokens to every session and 875 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
stripe-link-wallet
Agent wallet on the Stripe Link CLI (link-cli). Connect the wallet, then buy, purchase and pay for things on the user's behalf via approved spend requests, one-time-use cards, and 402 / Machine Payment Protocol (MPP) payments.
stock-analysis-lead
Orchestrate a US-stock investment analysis — classify sector archetype, fetch SEC filings, dispatch a tiered fan-out of six vertical equity-research agents (business model, earnings quality, balance sheet, management, industry, peer comparison) over a validated JSON findings contract, then synthesize a buy/hold/sell…
stock-business-review
Review a US-listed company's business model and revenue structure for an equity-research workup. Covers product/service mix, customer concentration, geographic exposure, industry position, revenue-growth decomposition (organic vs acquired vs price vs volume), and information-tier discipline (which numbers are facts vs…
stock-earnings-quality-review
Review a US-listed company's earnings quality, cash-flow integrity, and operating leverage for an equity-research workup. Covers operating cash flow vs net income drift, free cash flow trajectory, capex character (maintenance vs expansion), equity issuance / shareholder-return yield, revenue-quality signals…
stock-industry-review
Review a US-listed company's industry position and competitive moat for an equity-research workup. Covers Porter Five Forces scan, market-share trend (absolute and relative to industry growth), TAM size and trajectory, unit economics where disclosed (LTV/CAC, unit gross margin), moat classification (network / brand /…
stock-management-review
Review a US-listed company's management quality and capital-allocation track record for an equity-research workup. Covers 5-year capital-allocation history (buybacks vs dividends vs M&A vs capex vs debt), buyback timing, M&A return-on-investment, guidance-vs-actuals track record, comp-structure alignment, insider…