Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add auzroz/ynab-mcp --skill ynab-pulse-checkgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/auzroz/ynab-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/auzroz/ynab-mcp/ynab-pulse-check)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/auzroz/ynab-mcp/ynab-pulse-check"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/auzroz/ynab-mcp/ynab-pulse-check/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/auzroz/ynab-mcp/ynab-pulse-check"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/auzroz/ynab-mcp/ynab-pulse-check.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00091 | $0.00735 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00046 | $0.00367 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00147 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00073 |
Grade A, and why
ynab-pulse-check scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 87 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
YNAB Pulse Check
What this does
Runs a fast, low-ceremony status check on a YNAB budget: Ready to Assign, an overall health score, any overspent categories, and how spending pace compares to target for the month. It's the "how am I doing right now" answer, not a full review.
When to use this skill
- "How am I doing this month?"
- "How's my budget looking?"
- "Quick check on my finances"
- "Am I on track?"
- "Give me a status update"
- Any fast gut-check that doesn't need a full breakdown
Should NOT trigger on: "let's do my monthly review" (use ynab-monthly-review),
"where am I overspending" (use ynab-overspending-triage), or "how's my cash
flow" (use ynab-age-of-money).
Workflow
Step 1: Get the overview
Call MCP tool: ynab_quick_summary
Parameters: none
Step 2: Get the health score
Call MCP tool: ynab_budget_health
Parameters: none
Step 3: Check for overspending
Call MCP tool: ynab_overspending_alerts
Parameters: none
Step 4: Check spending pace
Call MCP tool: ynab_spending_pace
Parameters: none
Output format
YNAB Pulse Check — [date]
Ready to Assign: $X | Health Score: NN/100
Overspent categories: [list, or "none"]
Pace: spending $X/day vs $Y/day target → projected month-end: $Z
Top action item: [one sentence, or "nothing urgent"]
Troubleshooting
MCP connection failed — if tool calls fail with a connection error, check that the ynab-mcp server is connected (Settings > Connectors, or Claude Desktop's MCP server list should show it as "Connected").
Unauthorized / token expired — if calls return a 401 or an authorization error, the YNAB connection needs to be re-authorized. Walk the user through reconnecting rather than retrying the same call repeatedly.
Rate limit exceeded — YNAB API calls are capped; if a rate-limit error appears, wait before retrying rather than looping the same call.
When the skill is NOT the right tool
- A full end-of-month review with goals, net worth, and next month's
targets — use
ynab-monthly-review. - Actually fixing overspending (moving money between categories) — use
ynab-overspending-triage. - Checking the cash cushion or credit card float specifically — use
ynab-age-of-money.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 87 lines · 91 tokens per session scan A f27f1b4ca051
ynab-pulse-check is a skill published in the GitHub repository auzroz/ynab-mcp (3 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 91 tokens to every session and 735 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
stripe-link-wallet
Agent wallet on the Stripe Link CLI (link-cli). Connect the wallet, then buy, purchase and pay for things on the user's behalf via approved spend requests, one-time-use cards, and 402 / Machine Payment Protocol (MPP) payments.
stock-analysis-lead
Orchestrate a US-stock investment analysis — classify sector archetype, fetch SEC filings, dispatch a tiered fan-out of six vertical equity-research agents (business model, earnings quality, balance sheet, management, industry, peer comparison) over a validated JSON findings contract, then synthesize a buy/hold/sell…
stock-business-review
Review a US-listed company's business model and revenue structure for an equity-research workup. Covers product/service mix, customer concentration, geographic exposure, industry position, revenue-growth decomposition (organic vs acquired vs price vs volume), and information-tier discipline (which numbers are facts vs…
stock-earnings-quality-review
Review a US-listed company's earnings quality, cash-flow integrity, and operating leverage for an equity-research workup. Covers operating cash flow vs net income drift, free cash flow trajectory, capex character (maintenance vs expansion), equity issuance / shareholder-return yield, revenue-quality signals…
stock-balance-sheet-review
Review a US-listed company's balance sheet health for an equity-research workup. Covers net-debt/EBITDA leverage, current ratio, cash runway, goodwill concentration and impairment history, DSO trend, inventory days, off-balance-sheet items (operating leases, contingent liabilities), and pension underfunding. Trigger…
stock-industry-review
Review a US-listed company's industry position and competitive moat for an equity-research workup. Covers Porter Five Forces scan, market-share trend (absolute and relative to industry growth), TAM size and trajectory, unit economics where disclosed (LTV/CAC, unit gross margin), moat classification (network / brand /…