Agentic Bug Hunter is a terminal toolkit that uses AI to investigate security targets, test for vulnerabilities, validate findings, and write bug bounty reports. It is for ethical hackers submitting findings to platforms such as HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, or Immunefi, and can resume previous sessions. The catalogue entries package commands, skills, agents, instructions, hooks, and settings for using the toolkit.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Awarexone/Agentic-Bug-Hunter --skill credential-attackgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Awarexone/Agentic-Bug-HunterWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/awarexone/agentic-bug-hunter/credential-attack)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/awarexone/agentic-bug-hunter/credential-attack"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/awarexone/agentic-bug-hunter/credential-attack/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/awarexone/agentic-bug-hunter/credential-attack"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/awarexone/agentic-bug-hunter/credential-attack.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00102 | $0.04931 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00041 | $0.01972 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00020 | $0.00986 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00493 |
Grade A, and why
credential-attack scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
| `http-form` | Custom login page (most BB targets) | Pure Python urllib | Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- credential-attack — 92% identical, 76 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 388 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
CREDENTIAL ATTACK PIPELINE
Real-world initial-access vector. Verizon DBIR consistently ranks Stolen Credentials in the top 3 incident types. Most BB hunters skip this because they only try rockyou.txt and get rate-limited.
Core principle: humans pick lazy passwords. {CompanyName}{Year}!, {ProductName}{Season}, {City}123. Harvesting company-specific vocabulary (product names, office cities, internal project codes) before spraying is what makes the hit-rate go from 0.01% to 1%+.
This skill covers WHEN to use credential attack, HOW to chain the 4 commands, and the legal/operational guardrails.
WHEN TO RUN CREDENTIAL ATTACK
Credential attack is a parallel branch to /hunt, not a replacement. Both come after /recon:
/recon ──┬──▶ /hunt (web vuln scan) ──┐
│ ├──▶ /validate ──▶ /report
└──▶ /wordlist-gen → ... → /spray ──┘
Run it when:
- Target has a discoverable login endpoint (web form / O365 / Okta / OAuth)
- Program scope explicitly permits authentication testing or credential testing
- You can stomach a 30-min-to-multi-hour run (with conservative defaults)
Skip it when:
- Program policy lists "credential stuffing", "brute force", or "password attacks" as out-of-scope (this is the majority)
- Target only has SSO via a provider you don't control (e.g., "Login with Google")
- The login endpoint is rate-limited so aggressively that even 1 attempt/30min triggers alerts
KILL signals (don't even start):
- No login surface in recon output
- WAF (Cloudflare with Bot Management, Akamai) on every auth endpoint
- Program runs an active red-team — they'll see your spray immediately
- You don't have a clean wordlist yet (running rockyou.txt is a waste of lockouts)
THE 4-STAGE PIPELINE
/wordlist-gen ──▶ /breach-check ──▶ /osint-employees ──▶ /spray
(company words) (rank by HIBP) (real usernames) (live attempts)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 388 lines · 102 tokens per session scan A 86d34b508a81
credential-attack is a skill published in the GitHub repository Awarexone/Agentic-Bug-Hunter (5,315 stars, last pushed 8d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 102 tokens to every session and 4,931 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
bugcrowd-reporting
Bugcrowd-specific reporting tactics complementing report-writing: VRT category search-and-fallback strategy when no exact match exists, manual severity override when VRT defaults underrate impact, severity-request paragraph as first body section, OOS-clause rebuttal templates (rate limiting on auth-flow endpoints…
enterprise-vpn-attack
External SSL VPN / remote-access appliance attack matrix — Cisco ASA/AnyConnect, Fortinet FortiGate/FortiOS, Citrix NetScaler/ADC, Palo Alto GlobalProtect, Pulse Secure / Ivanti Connect Secure, SonicWall, F5 Big-IP. Covers version fingerprinting, CVE matrix (2018-2026), AAA backend identification, default credentials…
evidence-hygiene
Evidence-capture and PoC-redaction discipline for bug-bounty submissions: cookie redaction protocol (which fields to mask, Preview annotation / Burp panel hiding / DevTools workflow), PII black-bar discipline (what to mask in other-user data — names, emails, phones, faces — vs what is safe to leave — usernames, trace…
hunt-api-misconfig
Hunt API security misconfiguration — mass assignment, prototype pollution, HTTP verb tampering. Mass assignment: send {isadmin:true, role:admin, verified:true} on profile/account/reset endpoints — server blindly applies. JWT signature/crypto forging (alg:none, key confusion, kid/jku) is owned by hunt-jwt-crypto; this…
hunt-aspnet
Hunt ASP.NET-specific surface — ViewState deserialization (signed-only vs encrypted), machineKey recovery, dual-parser MAC-bypass anti-pattern, request-validator bypass, trace.axd/elmah.axd disclosure, load-balanced ViewState cross-node failures, SafeControl enumeration via reflection, customErrors mode=Off…
hunt-ato
Hunt account takeover taxonomy — 9 distinct paths to ATO, plus chains. Paths: (1) password reset flaws (host-header injection redirects token, predictable/numeric token, Referer leak, no-expiry/reuse), (2) email change without re-auth, (3) OAuth account-link CSRF, (4) MFA bypass (per hunt-mfa-bypass), (5) session…