Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add aws/tools-for-devops-agent --skill aws-backup-coverage-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/aws/tools-for-devops-agentWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/aws/tools-for-devops-agent/aws-backup-coverage-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aws/tools-for-devops-agent/aws-backup-coverage-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aws/tools-for-devops-agent/aws-backup-coverage-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aws/tools-for-devops-agent/aws-backup-coverage-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aws/tools-for-devops-agent/aws-backup-coverage-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00204 | $0.06202 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00082 | $0.02481 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00041 | $0.01240 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00020 | $0.00620 |
Grade A, and why
aws-backup-coverage-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 17d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 461 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
AWS Backup Coverage Review
Perform a structured, read-only coverage and posture review of AWS Backup in one account across all enabled Regions. The review answers one question precisely — which backup-eligible resources are actually recoverable, and which are not — then explains why each gap exists and how to close it.
Output Contract — read this before doing anything else
The only acceptable output of this skill is the full report defined in the Final Delivery Contract below. A conversational prose summary of the findings — however accurate, however well organised — is a failed run.
Every response must contain, in order: Scope (including Regions swept and not swept), Coverage Rating with a coverage percentage, Executive Summary, Coverage Matrix, Findings & Recommendations, a Check Coverage Matrix with all 23 rows, and Next Steps.
Three failure modes to avoid specifically, because all three feel natural in a chat:
- Do not compress the report into narrative bullets because the question was phrased casually. "What isn't being backed up?" requires the same full report as "run an AWS Backup coverage review".
- Do not substitute a direct lookup when the question is narrow. "Are my EBS volumes protected in us-east-1?" narrows the scope of the review; it does not authorise a different output. Narrow the sweep, then render the full report for that scope. See Scoped requests under the Final Delivery Contract — and Follow-up questions in the same conversation for the single exception, which applies only after a qualifying report has already been delivered in this conversation.
- Do not end with an offer to investigate further or to fix anything ("want me to dig into any of these?", "which gap would you like to tackle first?"). The report is the deliverable, complete on first response. Findings the review surfaces are already in it, each with a recommendation and an SLA bucket. In particular, never offer to "run the full coverage review" as a follow-up — if this skill loaded, the full review for the requested scope is the current response.
What ships with it
60 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- .skilleval.yaml 77 B
- assets/report-format.md 18 KB
- CHANGELOG.md 16 KB
- evals/.gitignore 453 B
- evals/additional-permissions.json 252 B
- evals/best-practices/v19/benchmark.json 6.6 KB
- evals/best-practices/v19/iteration-1/best-practices-tests-results.json 11 KB
- evals/best-practices/v19/iteration-2/best-practices-tests-results.json 10 KB
- evals/best-practices/v19/iteration-3/best-practices-tests-results.json 10 KB
- evals/eval_queries.json 746 B
- evals/evals.json 9.0 KB
- evals/files/backup-context.json 1.2 KB
- evals/functional/v8/_metadata.json 14 KB
- evals/functional/v8/benchmark.json 59 KB
- evals/functional/v8/evals.json 8.8 KB
- evals/functional/v8/iteration-1/backup-coverage-review-colloquial/with_skill/functional-tests-results.json 5.9 KB
- evals/functional/v8/iteration-1/backup-coverage-review-colloquial/with_skill/outputs/journal_records.json 508 KB
- evals/functional/v8/iteration-1/backup-coverage-review-colloquial/without_skill/functional-tests-results.json 2.4 KB
- evals/functional/v8/iteration-1/backup-coverage-review-colloquial/without_skill/outputs/journal_records.json 120 KB
- evals/functional/v8/iteration-1/backup-coverage-review-explicit/with_skill/functional-tests-results.json 9.5 KB
- evals/functional/v8/iteration-1/backup-coverage-review-explicit/with_skill/outputs/journal_records.json 527 KB
- evals/functional/v8/iteration-1/backup-coverage-review-explicit/without_skill/functional-tests-results.json 3.9 KB
- evals/functional/v8/iteration-1/backup-coverage-review-explicit/without_skill/outputs/journal_records.json 105 KB
- evals/functional/v8/iteration-1/backup-coverage-review-multi-region/with_skill/functional-tests-results.json 4.9 KB
- evals/functional/v8/iteration-1/backup-coverage-review-multi-region/with_skill/outputs/journal_records.json 492 KB
- evals/functional/v8/iteration-1/backup-coverage-review-multi-region/without_skill/functional-tests-results.json 5.6 KB
- evals/functional/v8/iteration-1/backup-coverage-review-multi-region/without_skill/outputs/journal_records.json 43 KB
- evals/functional/v8/iteration-1/backup-coverage-review-single-resource-type/with_skill/functional-tests-results.json 7.1 KB
- evals/functional/v8/iteration-1/backup-coverage-review-single-resource-type/with_skill/outputs/journal_records.json 186 KB
- evals/functional/v8/iteration-1/backup-coverage-review-single-resource-type/without_skill/functional-tests-results.json 5.2 KB
- evals/functional/v8/iteration-1/backup-coverage-review-single-resource-type/without_skill/outputs/journal_records.json 16 KB
- evals/functional/v8/iteration-1/unrelated-lambda-cold-start/with_skill/functional-tests-results.json 441 B
- evals/functional/v8/iteration-1/unrelated-lambda-cold-start/with_skill/outputs/journal_records.json 6.1 KB
- evals/functional/v8/iteration-2/backup-coverage-review-colloquial/with_skill/functional-tests-results.json 5.5 KB
- evals/functional/v8/iteration-2/backup-coverage-review-colloquial/with_skill/outputs/journal_records.json 68 KB
- evals/functional/v8/iteration-2/backup-coverage-review-colloquial/without_skill/functional-tests-results.json 4.9 KB
- evals/functional/v8/iteration-2/backup-coverage-review-colloquial/without_skill/outputs/journal_records.json 84 KB
- evals/functional/v8/iteration-2/backup-coverage-review-explicit/with_skill/functional-tests-results.json 11 KB
- evals/functional/v8/iteration-2/backup-coverage-review-explicit/with_skill/outputs/journal_records.json 555 KB
- evals/functional/v8/iteration-2/backup-coverage-review-explicit/without_skill/functional-tests-results.json 3.9 KB
- evals/functional/v8/iteration-2/backup-coverage-review-explicit/without_skill/outputs/journal_records.json 73 KB
- evals/functional/v8/iteration-2/backup-coverage-review-multi-region/with_skill/functional-tests-results.json 5.1 KB
- evals/functional/v8/iteration-2/backup-coverage-review-multi-region/with_skill/outputs/journal_records.json 505 KB
- evals/functional/v8/iteration-2/backup-coverage-review-multi-region/without_skill/functional-tests-results.json 2.5 KB
- evals/functional/v8/iteration-2/backup-coverage-review-multi-region/without_skill/outputs/journal_records.json 87 KB
- evals/functional/v8/iteration-2/backup-coverage-review-single-resource-type/with_skill/functional-tests-results.json 6.1 KB
- evals/functional/v8/iteration-2/backup-coverage-review-single-resource-type/with_skill/outputs/journal_records.json 7.3 KB
- evals/functional/v8/iteration-2/backup-coverage-review-single-resource-type/without_skill/functional-tests-results.json 5.3 KB
- evals/functional/v8/iteration-2/backup-coverage-review-single-resource-type/without_skill/outputs/journal_records.json 17 KB
- evals/functional/v8/iteration-2/unrelated-lambda-cold-start/with_skill/functional-tests-results.json 441 B
- evals/functional/v8/iteration-2/unrelated-lambda-cold-start/with_skill/outputs/journal_records.json 6.1 KB
- evals/functional/v8/iteration-3/backup-coverage-review-colloquial/with_skill/functional-tests-results.json 5.4 KB
- evals/functional/v8/iteration-3/backup-coverage-review-colloquial/with_skill/outputs/journal_records.json 440 KB
- evals/functional/v8/iteration-3/backup-coverage-review-colloquial/without_skill/functional-tests-results.json 5.3 KB
- evals/functional/v8/iteration-3/backup-coverage-review-colloquial/without_skill/outputs/journal_records.json 78 KB
- evals/functional/v8/iteration-3/backup-coverage-review-explicit/with_skill/functional-tests-results.json 9.9 KB
- evals/functional/v8/iteration-3/backup-coverage-review-explicit/with_skill/outputs/journal_records.json 506 KB
- evals/functional/v8/iteration-3/backup-coverage-review-explicit/without_skill/functional-tests-results.json 3.9 KB
- evals/functional/v8/iteration-3/backup-coverage-review-explicit/without_skill/outputs/journal_records.json 89 KB
- evals/functional/v8/iteration-3/backup-coverage-review-multi-region/with_skill/functional-tests-results.json 5.5 KB
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 17d ago First seen · 461 lines · 204 tokens per session scan A e0436cccac9b
aws-backup-coverage-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository aws/tools-for-devops-agent (107 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 204 tokens to every session and 6,202 once invoked, about $0.0008 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-29.
Other skills, from other repositories
hyperpod-node-debugger
Diagnose and remediate per-node issues on a HyperPod cluster (EKS or Slurm) — a specific node is unhealthy, unresponsive, stuck, or needs replacing. Covers on-node EFA, GPU / accelerator hardware (XID, ECC, NVLink, row-remap, DCGM), Slurm node down/drained, disk and memory pressure, per-node lifecycle-script failures…
amplify-workflow
Build and deploy full-stack web and mobile apps with AWS Amplify Gen2 (TypeScript code-first). Covers auth (Cognito), data (AppSync/DynamoDB including schema modeling, enum types, relationships, authorization rules), storage (S3), functions, APIs, and AI (Amplify AI Kit with Bedrock). Supports React, Next.js, Vue…
aws-lambda-managed-instances
Evaluate, configure, and migrate workloads to AWS Lambda Managed Instances (LMI). Triggers on: Lambda Managed Instances, LMI, capacity provider, multi-concurrency Lambda, dedicated instance Lambda, EC2-backed Lambda, cold start elimination, Graviton Lambda, instance type for Lambda, scheduled scaling for LMI, Lambda…
aws-architecture-diagram
Generate validated AWS architecture diagrams as draw.io XML using official AWS4 icon libraries. Use this skill whenever the user wants to create, generate, or design AWS architecture diagrams, cloud infrastructure diagrams, or system design visuals. Also triggers for requests to visualize existing infrastructure from…
hyperpod-cluster-debugger
Diagnose and remediate cluster-wide HyperPod (EKS or Slurm) problems — creation / deployment failures (CloudFormation, EFA health check, lifecycle scripts, capacity), EKS access, node replacement, CloudFormation nested-stack errors, post-maintenance rollback state, dangling nodes, autoscaler conflicts. Includes…
hyperpod-nccl
Diagnose NCCL failures and adjacent training-pod failures on HyperPod GPU clusters (EKS or Slurm) — training hangs, AllReduce / collective-op timeouts, EFA or libfabric errors, rendezvous failures, EFA TCP fallback, /dev/shm or memlock issues, NCCL version mismatch across pods, container OOM / exit-137 / OOMKilled…