awslabs/agent-plugins is a collection of plugins, skills, instructions, an MCP server, a hook, and a setting that guide AI coding agents in architecting, deploying, and operating software on Amazon Web Services. It is for developers using coding agents such as Claude Code, Codex, and Cursor with AWS projects. The catalogue entries are the repository's own agent workflows and supporting components.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add awslabs/agent-plugins --skill dataset-evaluationgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/awslabs/agent-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/awslabs/agent-plugins/dataset-evaluation)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/awslabs/agent-plugins/dataset-evaluation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/awslabs/agent-plugins/dataset-evaluation/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/awslabs/agent-plugins/dataset-evaluation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/awslabs/agent-plugins/dataset-evaluation.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00093 | $0.01065 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00037 | $0.00426 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00019 | $0.00213 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00106 |
Grade A, and why
dataset-evaluation scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- dataset-evaluation — 95% identical, 16 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 72 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Workflow Instruction
Follow the workflow shown below. Locate the dataset, check the file type, and resolve any issues with missing files or wrong file types. Determine the fine-tuning model and fine-tuning strategy. Run the appropriate validation based on the model family. Summarize the results: is the dataset ready for fine-tuning?
Prerequisites
- The SDK environment has been verified (SDK version, region, execution role). If not done, activate the
sdk-getting-startedskill first.
Workflow
-
Locate Dataset:
- The full path may be a local file path, or an S3 URI
- Resolve the full path to the dataset file, make sure read permissions are available, and help the user if the file is not found
-
Determine strategy and model:
- File formatting depends on the currently selected fine-tuning strategy and fine-tuning base model.
- If the strategy and model are already known from the conversation context (e.g., selected via the model-selection and finetuning-technique skills), use them.
- If not available in context, activate the model-selection and/or finetuning-technique skills to determine them before proceeding.
- Exception: If the user is validating an evaluation dataset (not a training dataset), neither model nor technique is required — the format detector can validate eval format (query/response structure) independently. Do not block on model-selection or finetuning-technique for eval dataset validation.
-
Check File Formatting: Run the tool format_detector.py to make sure the file conforms to formatting requirements.
- Send the full path directly to the format_detector script as an argument
- Do not send the model and strategy as arguments
- Do not download data from S3
- Do not make local copies of data
-
Summarize Results: Tell the user if their data is ready
- Examine the output of format_detector and compare to the known strategy and model
- Important: training datasets and evaluation datasets have different format requirements.
- Training datasets must match the fine-tuning strategy format per
references/strategy_data_requirements.md - Evaluation datasets (for model evaluation) must match one of the SageMaker evaluation dataset formats.
- Custom Scorer evaluation datasets have scorer-specific requirements. If the dataset is intended for Custom Scorer evaluation (Prime Math, Prime Code, or Custom Lambda), read
references/custom-scorer-evaluation-dataset-formats.mdand validate against the scorer-specific schema. The scorer type should be known from conversation context (determined in the model-evaluation skill).
- Training datasets must match the fine-tuning strategy format per
- Report back to the user if their current dataset is valid for its intended purpose
- Warn the user if their dataset is valid, but for a different strategy or model
- Warn the user if their dataset is not valid for any strategy/model pair
- If the user plans to finetune a model with the evaluated dataset, it needs to be uploaded to an S3 bucket in the same region as the planned training job (usually the default region). Warn the user if this is NOT the case.
- If the dataset is NOT in the necessary format, recommend transforming it using the dataset-transformation skill, wait for user confirmation, and update the plan based on their response
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 72 lines · 93 tokens per session scan A e1b1357b373a
dataset-evaluation is a skill published in the GitHub repository awslabs/agent-plugins (924 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 93 tokens to every session and 1,065 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
llm-evaluation
LLM evaluation and testing patterns including prompt testing, hallucination detection, benchmark creation, and quality metrics. Use when testing LLM applications, validating prompt quality, implementing systematic evaluation, or measuring LLM performance.
ml-verify
Use when the user wants to verify code, config, or math before running — or proactively before any expensive training job or deployment.
tensor-plan-optimizer
Optimize HarnessGym tensor-layout kernelplan.json tasks with a generated MCP server for plan validation, dev/final benchmarking, trace analysis, rollback-safe search, candidate application, history comparison, and experiment ranking. Use when a task asks to minimize bestcycles for benchmark.py or tune tensor…
llm-patterns
LLM application patterns for evaluation, streaming, and testing. Evaluation: LLM-as-judge, multi-dimension scoring, hallucination detection, Langfuse integration. Streaming: SSE, FastAPI endpoints, tool calls in streams, backpressure. Testing: mocking LLM responses, VCR.py recording, structured output validation. Use…
playwright
Playwright E2E testing patterns. Trigger: When writing Playwright E2E tests (Page Object Model, selectors, MCP exploration workflow). For Prowler-specific UI conventions under ui/tests, also use prowler-test-ui.
nemo-automodel-model-onboarding
Guide for onboarding new model architectures into NeMo AutoModel, including architecture discovery, implementation patterns, registration, and validation.