Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add AyanbekDos/unfairgaps-os --skill unfairgapsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/AyanbekDos/unfairgaps-osWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ayanbekdos/unfairgaps-os/unfairgaps)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ayanbekdos/unfairgaps-os/unfairgaps"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ayanbekdos/unfairgaps-os/unfairgaps/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ayanbekdos/unfairgaps-os/unfairgaps"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ayanbekdos/unfairgaps-os/unfairgaps.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00102 | $0.03369 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00051 | $0.01684 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00020 | $0.00674 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00337 |
Grade A, and why
unfairgaps scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 213 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
THE ONE THING TO REMEMBER
We are not finding customers to sell to. We are finding UNFAIRGAPS - systemic holes in a regulatory regime where a good product can plug the leak for EVERYONE who hasn't been caught yet.
A $72M jury verdict is interesting only if it exposes a systemic gap (e.g., "no evidence chain for training compliance"), not because one company got hit.
A good event corroborates a SYSTEMIC PATTERN. A great report groups events into 3-5 confirmed systemic patterns, each with a clear answer to:
- Who will pay to avoid ending up in this data?
- What product could plug this hole?
- Why now - what's changing in enforcement/technology/market that makes this urgent?
An event with no corroboration in the ledger is anecdotal - report it separately, do not pretend it's a wedge.
One methodology, five operations
Four operations share the same 4-phase event-collection protocol (below). The fifth operation, profession-scan, uses a different 3-phase regulatory-profile protocol described in its own reference. Parse the user's intent into one of these operations, then load the matching op-specific reference from references/ for that operation's details.
| Operation | Input | Output | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| industry-scan | industry + country | Pain report: 3-5 CONFIRMED unfairgaps in that industry × country, each with product sketch | industry-scan.md |
| validate-idea | business idea + country | VALIDATED / PROMISING / WEAK / NO_EVIDENCE / SATURATED verdict grounded in enforcement data | validate-idea.md |
| site-audit | URL | Claims-vs-reality audit: per-claim verdicts + missed unfairgaps the site ignores | site-audit.md |
| customer-pains | URL | B2B2C unfairgaps affecting YOUR customers' customers, with pitch templates for outbound | customer-pains.md |
| profession-scan | profession + country (any country; auto-localizes regulators, language, currency) | Pain bundle for a profession: 8-15 pains with skill_specs (calculator / checklist / template / reference / advisor) | profession-scan.md |
What ships with it
5 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 213 lines · 102 tokens per session scan A 41bf5ffa52cc
unfairgaps is a skill published in the GitHub repository AyanbekDos/unfairgaps-os (112 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 102 tokens to every session and 3,369 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
specification-writing
A workflow for writing complete patent specifications from patent claims and an invention disclosure. It adapts the document to a chosen jurisdiction, such as the US, Europe, or China.
regulatory-research-fallback
Fallback workflow for regulatory research when web extraction tools fail on government PDFs.
x-scorecard
OpenSSF Scorecard for assessing open source project security. Check security best practices and compliance. Dependency: This is an x-cmd module. Install x-cmd first (see x-cmd skill for installation options). see x-cmd skill for installation.
gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb
Für Gesellschaftsrechtliche Satzungen AGB Abgrenzung: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt. Fachgebiet: AGB-Recht-Prüfer. Route: gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb.
memstack-business-gdpr
Use this skill when the user says 'GDPR', 'data protection', 'privacy compliance', 'DPA', 'DSAR', 'data subject request', 'cookie consent', 'privacy audit', 'CCPA', or asks 'do I need GDPR for this repo'. Scans the repository to detect what personal data is collected, classifies sensitivity, determines whether GDPR…
nda-review
Use when the user uploads or pastes a non-disclosure agreement and asks for review, redline, risk assessment, or a recommendation on whether to sign. Identifies missing standard protections, one-sided or unusual provisions, and operational issues; produces a structured report with severity ratings and citations to…