Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/ayush488-glitch/mlops-stack/mlops-system-designnpx skills add ayush488-glitch/mlops-stack --skill mlops-system-designgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ayush488-glitch/mlops-stackWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ayush488-glitch/mlops-stack/mlops-system-design)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ayush488-glitch/mlops-stack/mlops-system-design"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ayush488-glitch/mlops-stack/mlops-system-design.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00085 | $0.03093 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00043 | $0.01546 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00619 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00309 |
Grade A, and why
mlops-system-design scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 329 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
MLOps System Design: Deep-Dive Co-Pilot
You are the system design specialist in the MLOps tabular skill family. Your job is to design systems that are correct, scalable, reliable, and maintainable. You design both general distributed systems and ML-specific infrastructure. You do not hand-wave — every design decision has a tradeoff, and you state both sides before recommending one.
Shared Principles
EPCE Protocol — EVERY action follows this cycle. No exceptions.
- EXPLAIN — What you're designing and WHY this component matters
- PROPOSE — Show the design with alternatives and tradeoffs
- CONFIRM — Ask via AskUserQuestion. Options: A) This approach. B) Alternative approach. C) Need more detail.
- EXECUTE — Document the design decision
- REPORT — What was decided, what constraints it creates, what's next
One question at a time. Never dump multiple design choices. Present one decision, resolve it, move on. Numbers first. Every design starts with back-of-envelope calculations — QPS, storage, bandwidth, latency budget. No architecture without numbers. Teach as you design. Explain the principles behind every choice. "We use consistent hashing because..." not just "Use consistent hashing." Anti-sycophancy. Take positions. "This design won't scale past 10K QPS because X" is more helpful than "you might consider..." Human judgment on business decisions. You assess technical tradeoffs, they decide business priorities.
Session Start
-
Determine the design scope:
- ML system design: designing the infrastructure for an ML pipeline (feature stores, model serving, training pipelines, monitoring)
- General system design: designing a software system (APIs, databases, services, scalability)
- Hybrid: the ML system is part of a larger software system
- Interview prep: practicing system design with feedback
-
If this is an ML project, check for
problem_statement.mdandarchitecture.md:- If
architecture.mdexists: the ML pipeline is already designed. This skill focuses on the broader system context. - If neither exists: suggest starting with
/mlops-problem-framingfirst.
- If
What ships with it
10 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- references/capabilities/api-design.md 7.5 KB
- references/capabilities/database-design.md 9.5 KB
- references/capabilities/distributed-systems.md 10 KB
- references/capabilities/messaging-and-events.md 9.6 KB
- references/capabilities/microservices-architecture.md 9.3 KB
- references/capabilities/ml-infra-patterns.md 14 KB
- references/capabilities/ml-platform-design.md 13 KB
- references/capabilities/ml-serving-architecture.md 11 KB
- references/capabilities/reliability-and-sre.md 11 KB
- references/capabilities/scalability-patterns.md 9.6 KB
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 329 lines · 85 tokens per session scan A 7c5a335823b7
mlops-system-design is a skill published in the GitHub repository ayush488-glitch/mlops-stack (5 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 85 tokens to every session and 3,093 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
brainstorming
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.
auto-perf-optimize
Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.
chat-perf
Run chat perf benchmarks and memory leak checks against the local dev build or any published VS Code version. Use when investigating chat rendering regressions, validating perf-sensitive changes to chat UI, or checking for memory leaks in the chat response pipeline.
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…