Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to ayutaz/piper-plus. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ayutaz/piper-plus/dev/.claude/skills/create-pr/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ayutaz/piper-plusWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ayutaz/piper-plus/create-pr)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ayutaz/piper-plus/create-pr"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ayutaz/piper-plus/create-pr/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ayutaz/piper-plus/create-pr"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ayutaz/piper-plus/create-pr.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00103 | $0.04356 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00041 | $0.01742 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00021 | $0.00871 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00436 |
Grade A, and why
create-pr scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 244 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
PR 作成 + CI 監視 + レビュー対応 (end-to-end)
/create-pr 1 コマンドで PR ライフサイクル全体を完結する skill:
push → PR 作成 → CI 監視ループ → review thread 返信 + resolve → 報告
過去 /create-pr → /watch-pr → /reply-review を別々の skill 呼び出しで連鎖していたが、 「次の skill を Skill ツールで呼べ」 という散文 handoff は LLM が実行を飛ばすと工程が抜ける (PR #496 / #505 で発生)。 本 skill は全工程を inline フェーズ として持ち、 skill 間 handoff をゼロにする。
単体利用: CI 監視のみ →
/watch-pr <PR#>、 review 対応のみ →/reply-review <PR#>、 backlog 集計 →/check-review-backlog。 これらは本 skill のフェーズ 5 / 6 と同一手順の standalone 版。
自動発動条件
- 「PR を作って / 出して」「pull request を作って」「この変更で PR にして」「branch を push して PR にして」
明示呼び出し: /create-pr / /create-pr <base-branch> / /create-pr --no-watch (PR 作成のみ、 監視ループに入らない)
引数
$ARGUMENTS空: base =dev(memoryfeedback_merge_caution: 通常 dev を base)<base-branch>: 明示指定 (例:main)--title <title>: title 上書き (デフォルトは最新コミット message から抽出)--no-watch: フェーズ 5/6 (CI 監視・review 対応) を skip し PR 作成で終了
制約 (memory 参照)
- マイルストーン非付与 (
feedback_pr_no_milestones):--milestoneを付けない。 本文に「M1」等も書かない - auto-merge 禁止 (
feedback_merge_caution):gh pr merge --auto等を使わない。 マージはユーザー判断 - 本文書き換えは body-file (
feedback_pr_body_over_comments): 既存 PR 更新はgh pr edit --body-file。 新規コメント追記しない。 review thread への reply はこの制約の対象外 - --no-verify 禁止 (CLAUDE.md): hook bypass 系を使わない
- review thread の自動 reply は SAFE 系のみ: stale / Copilot style noise のみ自動 reply+resolve。 人間 reviewer・logic/security 指摘は user 判断 (フェーズ 6)
PR 本文フォーマット (重要 — テンプレート準拠必須)
PR 本文は .github/pull_request_template.md の必須セクションをすべて含むこと。 PR metadata workflow (.github/workflows/pr-metadata.yml) の pr-body-validate step が以下を検査し、 欠けると PR が必ず red になる (PR #505 で発生した既知バグ — 旧フォーマットはこのゲートを通らなかった):
- 本文が空でない
## Test Planセクションが存在し非空 (大文字 P。## Test planは grep^## Test Planに不一致で fail。<!-- -->コメントだけも fail)## Risk Levelセクションでチェックボックスがちょうど 1 個- [x]## Affected Componentsセクションでチェックボックス最低 1 個- [x]## Typeセクションでチェックボックス最低 1 個- [x]
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago Changed · +5 lines fa945c5ac72b
- 2mo ago First seen · 239 lines · 103 tokens per session scan A 1b1076539b11
create-pr is a skill published in the GitHub repository ayutaz/piper-plus (239 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 103 tokens to every session and 4,356 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
github
GitHub operations via gh CLI: issues, PRs, CI runs, code review, API queries. Use when: (1) checking PR status or CI, (2) creating/commenting on issues, (3) listing/filtering PRs or issues, (4) viewing run logs. NOT for: complex web UI interactions requiring manual browser flows (use browser tooling when available)…
meta-codereview-current-diff
Read the current uncommitted diff, run three independent reviewers (safety + tests-coverage + style) in parallel, then arbitrate a single BLOCK / BLOCKWITHOVERRIDE / PASSWITHNOTES verdict. Use before commit when you want a multi-perspective second-opinion instead of a single-reviewer agent loop.
review-trtmc-pr
Review a TensorRT-Model-Connect GitHub PR or local contributor branch against the current post-#1093 model-family isolation architecture, repository rules, behavioral correctness, third-party dependency and license obligations, and exact-head validation evidence. Use for contributor self-review before marking a PR…
submit-github-pr
Use when publishing an existing TensorRT-Model-Connect change as a GitHub pull request. Verifies authenticated repository access, branch and diff scope, validation evidence, commit identity, reviewer-facing text, exact pushed head, and the created draft PR without merging it.
write-git-messages
Draft, revise, or review Git commit messages, PR titles, PR descriptions, and squash or rebase merge messages. Use when Codex needs to summarize a diff for reviewers, convert rough notes into a commit or PR message, check a message against Git and Conventional Commits style, or prepare repository contribution text…
pr
Draft a PR body from OMC's paper trail — the smallest visual that proves the change, evidence consumed from the verify protocol (never re-collected), reversibility from the ADR test on the diff, glossary language throughout.