Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Azzygoatcoder/agent-useful-skills --skill review-skillgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Azzygoatcoder/agent-useful-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/azzygoatcoder/agent-useful-skills/review-skill)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/azzygoatcoder/agent-useful-skills/review-skill"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/azzygoatcoder/agent-useful-skills/review-skill/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/azzygoatcoder/agent-useful-skills/review-skill"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/azzygoatcoder/agent-useful-skills/review-skill.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00089 | $0.00661 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00044 | $0.00331 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00132 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00066 |
Grade A, and why
review-skill scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Review — GitHub PR Review 工作流
评审者动作：看 PR → 评审 → 提交 approve/changes → 合并。与 pr-skill（作者提 PR）相对。
角色
本 skill 是「评审者」的 = 有 merge 权限的 maintainer / owner。作者侧走 pr-skill；代码质量评审按场景 B 委托通用 code-review 流程。
场景判定
| 场景 | 触发 | 动作 |
|---|---|---|
| A. 看 PR | "看这个 PR" / "review #N" | gh pr view + gh pr diff |
| B. 评审代码 | 判断质量 | 委托 code-review skill（找 bug + 复用/简化/效率） |
| C. 提交评审 | "approve" / "要求改" / "评论" | gh pr review --approve/--request-changes/--comment |
| D. 合并 | "合了" / "merge" | gh pr merge --merge/--squash/--rebase |
流程
- 看 PR：
gh pr view <N>读标题/正文/变更文件；gh pr diff <N>读 diff - 评代码质量：委托
code-reviewskill（找 bug + 复用/简化/效率清理）；意见按严重度分 - 提交评审：
gh pr review <N> --approve # 通过 gh pr review <N> --request-changes --body "..." # 要求改（列具体点，别空泛） gh pr review <N> --comment --body "..." # 仅评论，不表态 - 合并（approve 后）：
gh pr merge <N> --merge # 或 --squash / --rebase，按团队规范 gh pr close <N> # 不合并就关
自进化日志
| 日期 | 学习来源 | 吸收的模式 |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-13 | 协作流梳理（pr/release/issue 之后补 review） | review 是「评审者」的 skill（有 merge 权限），与 pr-skill 作者侧相对；代码质量委托 code-review skill，本 skill 只管 GitHub 机制（approve/changes/merge） |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 44 lines · 89 tokens per session scan A bdce077f7fe7
review-skill is a skill published in the GitHub repository Azzygoatcoder/agent-useful-skills (6 stars, last pushed 12d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 89 tokens to every session and 661 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
comet-github-pr-review
A read-only review process for pull requests in Comet's GitHub repositories. A pull request is a proposed code change; the review checks its current code, related issue, comments, merge status, and automated checks.
resolve-pr-comments
Evaluate, fix, answer, and reply to GitHub pull request review comments and conversation comments. Handles both change requests (fix or skip) and reviewer questions (explain using reasoning recalled from past Claude Code transcripts). Use when the user asks to "resolve PR comments", "fix review comments", "address PR…
fetch-pr-comments
Fetch and summarize review feedback and conversation from a GitHub PR (unresolved review threads, review bodies, and PR conversation comments) without making changes. Use when the user asks to "fetch PR comments", "show PR comments", "check PR for unresolved comments", "list review comments", "what comments are on the…
reply-to-pr-threads
Draft, confirm, and post replies to GitHub PR review threads. Handles per-category reply formatting, re-fetches thread resolution state so auto-resolved threads are skipped, and posts via GraphQL. Use when the user asks to "reply to PR threads", "post PR thread replies", or "draft PR reply messages".
reply-to-pr-conversation
Draft, confirm, and post a single conversational reply to GitHub PR conversation comments (issue comments). The reply addresses all tracked items in one natural-prose message. Use when the user asks to "reply to PR conversation", "post PR conversation replies", or "draft PR conversation messages".
re0-merge
Review and land an external contribution the way this suite does: gate it against the thesis, land it with the author's credit intact, complete a new skill rather than merging it raw, then approve, credit, and explain before closing. Use when reviewing a pull request, as any collaborator or maintainer, not only the…