Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add b-mendoza/agent-skills --skill review-pull-requestgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/b-mendoza/agent-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/b-mendoza/agent-skills/review-pull-request)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/b-mendoza/agent-skills/review-pull-request"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/b-mendoza/agent-skills/review-pull-request/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/b-mendoza/agent-skills/review-pull-request"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/b-mendoza/agent-skills/review-pull-request.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00078 | $0.02323 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00039 | $0.01162 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00465 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00232 |
Grade A, and why
review-pull-request scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What ships with it
12 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- assets/review-file-template.md 2.2 KB
- references/external-review-resources.md 5.1 KB
- references/review-workflow.md 9.9 KB
- scripts/collect-pr-review-comments.sh 822 B runs code
- scripts/post-pr-review.sh 1.0 KB runs code
- subagents/chunk-reviewer.md 4.4 KB
- subagents/comment-drafter.md 5.3 KB
- subagents/finding-adjudicator.md 4.8 KB
- subagents/pr-context-collector.md 5.1 KB
- subagents/review-poster.md 4.2 KB
- subagents/review-verifier.md 5.4 KB
- subagents/review-writer.md 3.2 KB
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 125 lines · 78 tokens per session scan A ccba6854b7f5
review-pull-request is a skill published in the GitHub repository b-mendoza/agent-skills (1 stars, last pushed yesterday), with no licence file. It adds 78 tokens to every session and 2,323 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
gentle-ai-collab-perfect
Trigger: contributing to Gentleman-Programming/gentle-ai as an external collaborator. Strict issue-first workflow, honest PR bodies, contributor-vs-maintainer scope, chained-PR strategy, verification protocol, docstring coverage. Load whenever the active repo is Gentleman-Programming/gentle-ai and any part of the…
branch-pr
Create Gentle AI pull requests with issue-first checks. Trigger: creating, opening, or preparing PRs for review.
work-unit-commits
Plan commits as reviewable work units. Trigger: implementation, commit splitting, chained PRs, or keeping tests and docs with code.
sem
Use sem to get entity-level (function/class/method) semantic diffs, impact analysis, blame, and dependency context from any Git repo. Trigger this skill whenever the user asks what changed in a commit or PR, wants to understand the blast radius of a change, needs to know who last modified a function, wants to trace…
resolve-pr-comments
Evaluate, fix, answer, and reply to GitHub pull request review comments and conversation comments. Handles both change requests (fix or skip) and reviewer questions (explain using reasoning recalled from past Claude Code transcripts). Use when the user asks to "resolve PR comments", "fix review comments", "address PR…
reply-to-pr-threads
Draft, confirm, and post replies to GitHub PR review threads. Handles per-category reply formatting, re-fetches thread resolution state so auto-resolved threads are skipped, and posts via GraphQL. Use when the user asks to "reply to PR threads", "post PR thread replies", or "draft PR reply messages".