Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add b-mendoza/agent-skills --skill review-pull-requestgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/b-mendoza/agent-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/b-mendoza/agent-skills/review-pull-request)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/b-mendoza/agent-skills/review-pull-request"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/b-mendoza/agent-skills/review-pull-request/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/b-mendoza/agent-skills/review-pull-request"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/b-mendoza/agent-skills/review-pull-request.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00066 | $0.03992 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00026 | $0.01597 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00798 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00399 |
Grade A, and why
review-pull-request scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What ships with it
9 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- references/external-review-resources.md 3.6 KB
- scripts/collect-pr-review-comments.sh 3.4 KB runs code
- scripts/post-review.py 17 KB runs code
- scripts/render-review.py 13 KB runs code
- scripts/validate-output.py 19 KB runs code
- subagents/chunk-reviewer.md 4.5 KB
- subagents/pr-context-collector.md 6.2 KB
- subagents/review-author.md 8.0 KB
- subagents/review-verifier.md 4.9 KB
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago Changed · -20 tokens per session 26fd84e27847
- 3d ago Changed · -2 lines 37b27403ae63
- 5d ago Changed · +18 lines · +8 tokens per session ed40836f0b8f
- 11d ago Changed 55a6f7cbfb65
- 1mo ago First seen · 125 lines · 78 tokens per session scan A ccba6854b7f5
review-pull-request is a skill published in the GitHub repository b-mendoza/agent-skills (3 stars, last pushed yesterday), with no licence file. It adds 66 tokens to every session and 3,992 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
pr
Draft a PR body from OMC's paper trail — the smallest visual that proves the change, evidence consumed from the verify protocol (never re-collected), reversibility from the ADR test on the diff, glossary language throughout.
merge-batch
Prepare and merge an owner-selected PR batch with contributor credit and exact-candidate admission. Use for a pasted PR list; combined focused validation is diagnostic, and every actual landing still requires its applicable checks and authorization.
otto-pr-review-loop
Run Polly and OCR on a PR until all findings settle.
engram-branch-pr
PR creation workflow for Engram following the issue-first enforcement system. Trigger: When creating a pull request, opening a PR, or preparing changes for review.
github-contributor
A step-by-step guide for contributing code, tests, documentation, or build changes to open-source projects you do not maintain. It explains how to prepare a pull request that follows the project’s rules and is easier for maintainers to review.
revdiff
Review diffs, files, and documents with inline annotations in a TUI overlay, or answer questions about revdiff usage, configuration, themes, and keybindings. Opens revdiff in agterm/tmux/zellij/herdr/kitty/wezterm/cmux/ghostty/iterm2/emacs-vterm, captures annotations, and addresses them. Works in git, hg, and jj repos…