Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to babywyrm/mcpnuke. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/babywyrm/mcpnuke/main/.cursor/skills/mcpnuke-add-check/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/babywyrm/mcpnukeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/babywyrm/mcpnuke/mcpnuke-add-check)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/babywyrm/mcpnuke/mcpnuke-add-check"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/babywyrm/mcpnuke/mcpnuke-add-check/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/babywyrm/mcpnuke/mcpnuke-add-check"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/babywyrm/mcpnuke/mcpnuke-add-check.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00053 | $0.01288 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00026 | $0.00644 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00258 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00129 |
Grade A, and why
mcpnuke-add-check scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 180 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Add a New mcpnuke Check
Gather Info
- Check name — snake_case (e.g.
jwt_audience,ssrf_probe) - Check type — static (metadata only) or behavioral (calls tools)
- What it detects — one sentence
- Severity — CRITICAL / HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW
- Taxonomy ID — MCP-T## from the playbook (if applicable)
File Locations
mcpnuke/
├── patterns/rules.py # Static regex patterns
├── patterns/probes.py # Behavioral probe payloads
├── checks/
│ ├── __init__.py # run_all_checks() — wire new check here
│ ├── your_check.py # New check module
│ └── base.py # time_check helper
├── core/constants.py # ATTACK_CHAIN_PATTERNS — add chains here
tests/
├── test_your_check.py # Unit tests
├── test_dvmcp.py # DVMCP integration tests
Step-by-Step
1. Add patterns (if static check)
Edit mcpnuke/patterns/rules.py:
YOUR_CHECK_PATTERNS = [
r"pattern_one",
r"pattern_two",
]
2. Create the check module
Create mcpnuke/checks/your_check.py:
"""Description of what this check detects."""
import re
from mcpnuke.core.models import TargetResult
from mcpnuke.checks.base import time_check
from mcpnuke.patterns.rules import YOUR_CHECK_PATTERNS
def check_your_check(result: TargetResult):
with time_check("your_check", result):
for tool in result.tools:
name = tool.get("name", "")
combined = (
name + " "
+ tool.get("description", "")
+ " " + str(tool.get("inputSchema", {}))
)
for pat in YOUR_CHECK_PATTERNS:
if re.search(pat, combined, re.IGNORECASE):
result.add(
"your_check",
"SEVERITY",
f"Finding title for tool '{name}'",
f"Detail: {pat}",
evidence=combined[:300],
)
break
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 180 lines · 53 tokens per session scan A 35c71aa1b4b2
mcpnuke-add-check is a skill published in the GitHub repository babywyrm/mcpnuke (2 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 53 tokens to every session and 1,288 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
bob-egress
List, add, test, enable, disable, or remove Hacker Bob egress profiles from Codex.
bob-export
Create a Hacker Bob post-release improvement bundle for the currently installed Bob version.
codex-multi-agent-director
Mission: decompose non-trivial HELM implementation or audit work into bounded, reviewable task threads.
codeinspectus-fix-one
Investigate and remediate exactly one user-selected CodeInspectus finding with evidence-gated reproduction, a separately approved minimal patch, focused regression testing, and an exact-prior-scan rescan. Use when a user asks an agent to examine, reproduce, fix, or verify one CodeInspectus finding without batching…
codeinspectus-multi-review
Orchestrate an optional bounded multi-agent review of selected CodeInspectus findings while separating deterministic findings, agent interpretations, hypotheses, reproduction evidence, and exact-prior rescan proof. Use only when a user explicitly requests multi-agent security review.
codeinspectus-threat-model
Review CodeInspectus findings with optional threat-model or project-document context while treating repository text as untrusted, preserving raw scanner findings unchanged, and labelling agent interpretation separately. Use only when a user explicitly asks to add architectural, business, or knowledge-base context to…