Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add backbay-labs/thrunt-god --skill thrunt-validate-phasegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/backbay-labs/thrunt-godWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/backbay-labs/thrunt-god/thrunt-validate-phase)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/backbay-labs/thrunt-god/thrunt-validate-phase"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/backbay-labs/thrunt-god/thrunt-validate-phase/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/backbay-labs/thrunt-god/thrunt-validate-phase"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/backbay-labs/thrunt-god/thrunt-validate-phase.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00019 | $0.00200 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00100 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00040 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00020 |
Grade A, and why
thrunt-validate-phase scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
88% identical to gsd-validate-phase — 18 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
Output: updated VALIDATION.md + generated test files.
<execution_context> @.github/thrunt-god/workflows/validate-phase.md </execution_context>
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 29 lines · 19 tokens per session scan A 4a4581682a9c
thrunt-validate-phase is a skill published in the GitHub repository backbay-labs/thrunt-god (36 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 19 tokens to every session and 200 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 88% identical to gsd-validate-phase, differing in 18 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
workflow-patterns
Use this skill when implementing tasks according to Conductor's TDD workflow, handling phase checkpoints, managing git commits for tasks, or understanding the verification protocol.
adk-go-self-review
Review an ADK Go change the way a maintainer will — a fresh-context pass over the whole diff, five lenses (correctness and tests, scope, simplicity, style, adk-python parity), and the mutation check that proves your tests pin the change. Use before opening a PR, before any later push that changes code, and when asked…
azure-cosmos-db-py
Build Azure Cosmos DB NoSQL services with Python/FastAPI following production-grade patterns. Use when implementing database client setup with dual auth (DefaultAzureCredential + emulator), service layer classes with CRUD operations, partition key strategies, parameterized queries, or TDD patterns for Cosmos. Triggers…
create-tooluniverse-skill
Create high-quality ToolUniverse skills following test-driven, implementation-agnostic methodology.
contract
Outcome-driven Cortex function development — declares a behavioral contract before generation begins, enforces evidence-tiered proof before $ship, and defends against the self-oracle evaluation failure mode.
testing
TDD/BDD testing principles. Use when writing tests, reviewing test coverage, setting up testing, or discussing test strategy and test architecture.