Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add backspace-shmackspace/claude-devkit --skill client-side-securitygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/backspace-shmackspace/claude-devkitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/backspace-shmackspace/claude-devkit/client-side-security)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/backspace-shmackspace/claude-devkit/client-side-security"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/backspace-shmackspace/claude-devkit/client-side-security/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/backspace-shmackspace/claude-devkit/client-side-security"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/backspace-shmackspace/claude-devkit/client-side-security.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00051 | $0.01360 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00020 | $0.00544 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00272 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00136 |
Grade A, and why
client-side-security scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
88% identical to client-side-security — 16 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 122 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Client-Side Web Security
Protect browser clients against code injection, request forgery, UI redress, cross-site leaks, and unsafe third-party scripts with layered, context-aware controls.
XSS Prevention (Context-Aware)
- HTML context: prefer
textContent. If HTML is required, sanitize with a vetted library (e.g., DOMPurify) and strict allow-lists. - Attribute context: always quote attributes and encode values.
- JavaScript context: do not build JS from untrusted strings; avoid inline event handlers; use
addEventListener. - URL context: validate protocol/domain and encode; block
javascript:and data URLs where inappropriate. - Redirects/forwards: never use user input directly for destinations; use server-side mapping (ID to URL) or validate against trusted domain allow-lists.
- CSS context: allow-list values; never inject raw style text from users.
Example sanitization:
const clean = DOMPurify.sanitize(userHtml, {
ALLOWED_TAGS: ['b','i','p','a','ul','li'],
ALLOWED_ATTR: ['href','target','rel'],
ALLOW_DATA_ATTR: false
});
DOM-based XSS and Dangerous Sinks
- Prohibit
innerHTML,outerHTML,document.writewith untrusted data. - Prohibit
eval,new Function, string-basedsetTimeout/setInterval. - Validate and encode data before assigning to
locationor event handler properties. - Use strict mode and explicit variable declarations to prevent global namespace pollution from DOM clobbering.
- Adopt Trusted Types and enforce strict CSP to prevent DOM sink exploitation.
Trusted Types + CSP:
Content-Security-Policy: script-src 'self' 'nonce-{random}'; object-src 'none'; base-uri 'self'; require-trusted-types-for 'script'
Content Security Policy (CSP)
- Prefer nonce-based or hash-based CSP over domain allow-lists.
- Start with Report-Only mode; collect violations; then enforce.
- Baseline to aim for:
default-src 'self'; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline'; frame-ancestors 'self'; form-action 'self'; object-src 'none'; base-uri 'none'; upgrade-insecure-requests.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 122 lines · 51 tokens per session scan A b1cd6cedeadf
client-side-security is a skill published in the GitHub repository backspace-shmackspace/claude-devkit (15 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 51 tokens to every session and 1,360 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 88% identical to client-side-security, differing in 16 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
architect
Produces Alon's design-doc system before code: SOURCEOFTRUTH.md, ARCHITECTUREROADMAP.md, TODOWORKFLOW.md, CLAUDE.md, plus a modular docs/architecture set for larger projects. Model first: data and invariants before framework, every invariant enforced at two boundaries, failure paths designed as deliberately as happy…
ponytail
Forces the laziest solution that actually works: YAGNI, reuse before new code, stdlib before custom, native platform before dependencies, one line before fifty. Three levels — lite (name the lazier alternative, build what's asked), full (ladder enforced, default), ultra (YAGNI extremist, challenge the requirement…
review-swarm
Local, free, multi-specialist review of a diff: parallel Claude subagents for correctness, security/trust boundaries, data/perf, architecture-altitude, ponytail-simplicity, and tests/failure-paths, each non-trivial finding adversarially verified before being kept, deduped, and ranked into a Blockers / Should-fix /…
ask-the-council
Convenes a panel of opinionated Claude advisors, each with a distinct mandate and a forbidden move so they genuinely diverge, then a Chairman synthesis that commits to one recommendation with the decisive tradeoff and the strongest dissent named.
prompt-generator
Turns a vague ask into a rigorous, grounded, token-efficient prompt for another agent or LLM: role and objective, testable done criteria, anti-hallucination and anti-tokenmaxing rules baked into the generated prompt itself, and strict agent discipline for coding-agent hand-offs.
up-to-date
Preflight sync and situational brief before repo work: fetches origin, reports ahead/behind divergence (with a no-upstream/detached-HEAD fallback), recent commits, open PRs and issues touching the work, and dirty-tree warnings, then names one recommended first action. Read-only by default — never pulls, rebases…