What is wiki-editorial-review?

A structured quality review for wiki pages that checks citations, factual claims, age of information, links to related pages, and required page fields.

For reviewing individual pages or a whole research area, ranking issues, and suggesting fixes for citations, stale claims, broken links, orphan pages, and formatting rules.

It identifies unsupported or outdated content and missing connections before those problems spread through the wiki.

How badwally/TheKnowledge configures Claude Code

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to badwally/TheKnowledge. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file

curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/badwally/TheKnowledge/main/.claude/skills/wiki-editorial-review/SKILL.md

Clone the repo

git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/badwally/TheKnowledge

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

README.md

[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/badwally/theknowledge/wiki-editorial-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/badwally/theknowledge/wiki-editorial-review)

Your own site

<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/badwally/theknowledge/wiki-editorial-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/badwally/theknowledge/wiki-editorial-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

Your own site · 80×15

<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/badwally/theknowledge/wiki-editorial-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/badwally/theknowledge/wiki-editorial-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>

Per session 23 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.

When invoked 537 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.

Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.

Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.

Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

Model	Per session	Once invoked
Fable 5.1	$0.00023	$0.00537
Opus 5.5	$0.00009	$0.00215
Sonnet 5.5	$0.00005	$0.00107
Haiku 4.5	$0.00002	$0.00054

Measured 2mo ago against content hash d283393f1559, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

wiki-editorial-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/skills/wiki-editorial-review/SKILL.md · 55 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 55 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

What This Does

Performs a structured editorial pass on one or more wiki pages: citation grounding, claim currency, cross-link completeness, and schema compliance. Produces a ranked list of issues with suggested remediation.

Reference conventions: WIKI.md § 12.2 (lint checks), § 7 (synthesis pages), § 6 (citations).

Usage

/wiki-editorial-review wiki/concepts/food-noise.md
/wiki-editorial-review --domain glp1          # Review all glp1-tagged pages

Execution Steps

Run lint on the target scope:
```
.venv/bin/wiki lint [--scope <check>]
```
Focus on: citation-density, stale-claims, orphans, broken-wikilinks, schema-drift.
Read target pages: For each flagged page, read the full content. Assess:
- Citation grounding: every factual claim followed by [[sources/<id>]]?
- Claim currency: references to recent events/studies that may be outdated?
- Cross-links: does the page link to related concepts and entities?
- Schema compliance: required frontmatter fields present? (WIKI.md § 3)
Prioritize findings: Rank by severity:
- Critical — citation missing on a specific factual claim
- High — stale claim with a clear update source
- Medium — missing cross-link to a closely related page
- Low — prose quality, heading structure
Propose fixes: For each critical/high finding, propose the specific remediation:
- Missing citation → suggest running /wiki-cite on the page
- Stale claim → identify the source that would update it
- Missing cross-link → name the target page
Apply with user approval: Do not apply fixes autonomously. Present the ranked list and ask which to address. Then use the appropriate skill or command.

Key constraints

Read-only by default. Never edit pages without explicit user confirmation per finding.
wiki lint writes a report to .knowledge/lint/ — not a wiki page.
Claim accuracy assessment is advisory; the user is the authority on domain knowledge.

Read the full file on GitHub · 55 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

2mo ago First seen · 55 lines · 23 tokens per session scan A d283393f1559

Subscribe to this mod's changes

wiki-editorial-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository badwally/TheKnowledge (23 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 23 tokens to every session and 537 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Writing and docs

wiki-editorial-review next to 6 skills from other repositories
Mod	Type	Stars	Last push	Licence	Scan	Tokens	Works with
wiki-editorial-reviewbadwally/TheKnowledge	Skill	23	3mo ago	MIT	A	23	Claude Code
imagegenopenai/codex	Skill	133k	yesterday	Apache-2.0	A	113	Codex
playwright-climicrosoft/playwright	Skill	99k	yesterday	Apache-2.0	A	19	Claude Code
local-ai-agentsmicrosoft/ai-agents-for-beginners	Skill	79k	4d ago	MIT	A	200	Claude Code, Codex
systematic-debuggingobra/superpowers	Skill	313k	3d ago	MIT	A	21	Claude Code
next-cache-components-adoptionvercel/next.js	Skill	143k	yesterday	MIT	A	95	Claude Code
next-partial-prefetching-adoptionvercel/next.js	Skill	143k	yesterday	MIT	A	103	Claude Code

TheKnowledge: Skill for Claude Code