Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add BagelHole/DevOps-Security-Agent-Skills --skill ai-security-hardeninggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/BagelHole/DevOps-Security-Agent-SkillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/bagelhole/devops-security-agent-skills/ai-security-hardening)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bagelhole/devops-security-agent-skills/ai-security-hardening"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bagelhole/devops-security-agent-skills/ai-security-hardening/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bagelhole/devops-security-agent-skills/ai-security-hardening"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bagelhole/devops-security-agent-skills/ai-security-hardening.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00051 | $0.02380 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00026 | $0.01190 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00476 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00238 |
Grade A, and why
ai-security-hardening scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 319 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
AI Security Hardening
Secure LLM and AI systems against prompt injection, jailbreaks, data leakage, and supply chain threats in production environments.
When to Use This Skill
Use this skill when:
- Deploying an LLM-powered application handling sensitive user data
- Protecting against prompt injection attacks in AI agents
- Implementing output filtering and content moderation
- Securing model weights and API endpoints from theft
- Achieving SOC2 or ISO 27001 compliance for AI systems
AI-Specific Threat Model
Threat Risk Control
─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Prompt injection System prompt override Input sanitization, separate context
Data exfiltration PII in model outputs Output filtering, DLP scanning
Jailbreaking Policy bypass Content moderation, guardrails
Model theft Weight extraction via API Rate limiting, access controls
Training data poisoning Backdoored fine-tuned model Dataset validation, provenance
Supply chain attack Malicious model weights Signature verification, scanning
Insecure output XSS/SQLi from LLM response Output encoding, parameterized queries
Prompt Injection Defense
import re
from typing import Optional
INJECTION_PATTERNS = [
r"ignore\s+(all\s+)?(previous|prior|above)\s+instructions",
r"you\s+are\s+now\s+",
r"new\s+instructions?:",
r"system\s+prompt",
r"forget\s+everything",
r"act\s+as\s+",
r"jailbreak",
r"dan\s+mode",
r"<\s*system\s*>",
r"\[INST\]",
]
def detect_prompt_injection(user_input: str) -> tuple[bool, Optional[str]]:
"""Return (is_suspicious, matched_pattern)."""
normalized = user_input.lower().strip()
for pattern in INJECTION_PATTERNS:
if re.search(pattern, normalized, re.IGNORECASE):
return True, pattern
return False, None
def sanitize_user_input(user_input: str, max_length: int = 4000) -> str:
"""Sanitize input before passing to LLM."""
# Truncate
user_input = user_input[:max_length]
# Remove null bytes and control characters
user_input = re.sub(r'[\x00-\x08\x0b\x0c\x0e-\x1f\x7f]', '', user_input)
# Check for injection
suspicious, pattern = detect_prompt_injection(user_input)
if suspicious:
raise ValueError(f"Potential prompt injection detected: {pattern}")
return user_input
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 319 lines · 51 tokens per session scan A 80fc8ee63e0f
ai-security-hardening is a skill published in the GitHub repository BagelHole/DevOps-Security-Agent-Skills (1,084 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 51 tokens to every session and 2,380 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
bedrock
AWS Bedrock foundation models for generative AI. Use when invoking foundation models, building AI applications, creating embeddings, configuring model access, or implementing RAG patterns.
implementing-aws-macie-for-data-classification
Implement Amazon Macie to automatically discover, classify, and protect sensitive data in S3 buckets using machine learning and pattern matching for PII, financial data, and credentials detection.
ai-gateway-guardrails
Enforce Input/Output Guardrails at the LLM Gateway layer — PII redaction, Prompt Injection defense, Jailbreak detection, Toxicity filter, and Tool Allow-list. Integrates Bedrock Guardrails, NeMo Guardrails, Llama Guard 3, and regex/regex-ML policies on Bifrost/LiteLLM with Langfuse audit trail.
gpu-resource-management
Design GPU orchestration on EKS using Karpenter v1.2+ NodePools, KEDA scale-to-zero, and DRA 1.35 GA for multi-instance GPU (MIG) partitioning. Right-size NodePool for p5/g6e/trn2 instance mix, spot/on-demand split, consolidation, and topology-aware scheduling.
inference-gateway-routing
Configure kgateway v2.0+ as L1 and Bifrost v1.x or LiteLLM v1.60+ as L2 for a 2-Tier Inference Gateway on EKS. Apply Cascade Routing (Haiku→Sonnet→Opus fallback), Semantic Router (intent-based model pick), and HTTPRoute with OTel trace propagation to Langfuse.
vllm-serving-setup
Design, deploy, and tune vLLM v0.18.2 inference serving on EKS with PagedAttention v2, Multi-LoRA, FP8 KV Cache, Chunked Prefill, and Continuous Batching. Produces Helm values.yaml, PodMonitor, HPA, and kubectl validation steps for production agentic workloads.