Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add BaggaT236/AI-Trading-Skills --skill data-quality-checkergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/BaggaT236/AI-Trading-SkillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/baggat236/ai-trading-skills/data-quality-checker)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/baggat236/ai-trading-skills/data-quality-checker"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/baggat236/ai-trading-skills/data-quality-checker/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/baggat236/ai-trading-skills/data-quality-checker"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/baggat236/ai-trading-skills/data-quality-checker.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00072 | $0.01375 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00036 | $0.00687 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00275 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00137 |
Grade A, and why
data-quality-checker scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
92% identical to data-quality-checker — 12 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 162 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Overview
Detect common data quality issues in market analysis documents before publication. The checker validates five categories: price scale consistency, instrument notation, date/weekday accuracy, allocation totals, and unit usage. All findings are advisory -- they flag potential issues for human review rather than blocking publication.
When to Use
- Before publishing a weekly strategy blog or market analysis report
- After generating automated market summaries
- When reviewing translated documents (English/Japanese) for data accuracy
- When combining data from multiple sources (FRED, FMP, FINVIZ) into one report
- As a pre-flight check for any document containing financial data
Prerequisites
- Node.js 18+
- No external API keys required
- Run scripts with
npx tsx(or compile TS to JS first)
Workflow
Step 1: Receive Input Document
Accept the target markdown file path and optional parameters:
--file: Path to the markdown document to validate (required)--checks: Comma-separated list of checks to run (optional; default: all)--as-of: Reference date for year inference in YYYY-MM-DD format (optional)--output-dir: Directory for report output (optional; default:reports/)
Step 2: Execute Validation Script
Run the data quality checker script:
npx tsx skills/data-quality-checker/scripts/check_data_quality.ts \
--file path/to/document.md \
--output-dir reports/
To run specific checks only:
npx tsx skills/data-quality-checker/scripts/check_data_quality.ts \
--file path/to/document.md \
--checks price_scale,dates,allocations
To provide a reference date for year inference (useful for documents without explicit year in dates):
npx tsx skills/data-quality-checker/scripts/check_data_quality.ts \
--file path/to/document.md \
--as-of 2026-02-28
Step 3: Load Reference Standards
Read the relevant reference documents to contextualize findings:
references/instrument_notation_standard.md-- Standard ticker notation, digit-count hints, and naming conventions for each instrument classreferences/common_data_errors.md-- Catalog of frequently observed errors including FRED data delays, ETF/futures scale confusion, holiday oversights, allocation total pitfalls, and unit confusion patterns
What ships with it
7 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- references/common_data_errors.md 6.7 KB
- references/instrument_notation_standard.md 4.0 KB
- scripts/check_data_quality.py 26 KB runs code
- scripts/check_data_quality.ts 21 KB runs code
- scripts/tests/check_data_quality.test.ts 3.5 KB runs code
- scripts/tests/conftest.py 304 B runs code
- scripts/tests/test_check_data_quality.py 25 KB runs code
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 162 lines · 72 tokens per session scan A efe9022c689b
data-quality-checker is a skill published in the GitHub repository BaggaT236/AI-Trading-Skills (121 stars, last pushed 8d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 72 tokens to every session and 1,375 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 92% identical to data-quality-checker, differing in 12 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
ib-pmcc-advisor
Analyze PMCC (Poor Man's Covered Call / diagonal spread) positions from IB portfolio. For each diagonal spread, reports short leg risk (delta, IV, assignment probability), daily P&L projections, top-3 roll candidates, and a side-by-side comparison table. Requires TWS or IB Gateway running locally.
scanner-pmcc
Scan stocks for Poor Man's Covered Call (PMCC) suitability. Analyzes LEAPS and short call options for delta, liquidity, spread, IV, yield, trend direction, and earnings proximity. Use when user asks about PMCC candidates, diagonal spreads, or LEAPS strategies.
ib-stop-loss
Downside stop-loss management for PMCC, naked LEAPS, and stock positions in IB. Computes stop prices, detects alerts, and places conditional combo orders. Dry-run by default. Requires TWS or IB Gateway running locally.
ib-trailing-stop
Server-side trailing stop management for stocks and naked LEAPS in IB. Places native TRAIL orders that auto-ratchet the stop as price climbs. Dry-run by default. Requires TWS or IB Gateway running locally.
stock_analyzer
A stock and market analysis skill that returns structured information about trends, prices, news, risks, catalysts, and possible trading plans.
ib-find-short-roll
Find roll options for existing short positions OR find best covered call/put to open against long stock. Use when user asks about rolling shorts, finding roll candidates, writing covered calls, or managing option positions. Requires TWS or IB Gateway running locally.