Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add baleen37/bstack --skill wizardgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/baleen37/bstackWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/baleen37/bstack/wizard)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/baleen37/bstack/wizard"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/baleen37/bstack/wizard/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/baleen37/bstack/wizard"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/baleen37/bstack/wizard.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00058 | $0.00957 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00029 | $0.00478 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00191 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00096 |
Grade A, and why
wizard scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to wizard — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 45 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Wizard
A wizard is a bash script that walks a human, step by step, through a manual procedure that's tedious to do by hand and tedious to re-explain to an AI every time. It opens each URL, says exactly what to click and copy, captures the values, writes them where they belong (.env, GitHub secrets), confirms at every stage, and shows how many stages are left. It might configure third-party services, run a one-off migration, or move the project from one state to another.
The delightful UX is already solved by template.sh: stage-by-stage progress, confirmation gates, cross-platform URL opening (including WSL), hidden secret entry, idempotent .env upserts, gh secret/gh variable writes, and a closing summary. Your job is only to scope the procedure and author its stages. The library above the STAGES marker is identical in every wizard; that consistency is the point: never hand-edit it.
A wizard is ephemeral by default: built for one run, saved to a scratch or scripts/ path, deleted when the job's done. Commit it only when the user wants a repeatable setup path that should live in the repo.
Process
1. Scope the procedure
Work out every manual step the human must take and every value that gets captured along the way. Read the repo first, don't ask cold:
- For setup:
.env,.env.example,.env.*,README,docker-compose*, framework config, and.github/workflows/*(everysecrets.*/vars.*reference is a value the wizard must produce). - For a migration or transition: the current state, the target state, and the irreversible actions between them.
Then show the user the ordered list of stages and the values each produces, and confirm: they may add, drop, or reorder.
Done when: every stage is named in order, and for each captured value you know (a) where the human gets it, (b) where it's written (.env, a GitHub secret, both, or nowhere; some stages are pure actions), and (c) whether it's secret (hidden entry) or public.
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 45 lines · 58 tokens per session scan A bdf31d48211e
wizard is a skill published in the GitHub repository baleen37/bstack (4 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 58 tokens to every session and 957 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to wizard, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
repo-scaffold
Scaffold or standardize a production-ready repository structure with specs, source layout, tests, CI, agent context, config examples, release notes, and operational docs. Use when starting a new repo, turning a prototype into a maintainable project, adding missing repository foundations, or creating a repo skeleton…
release-engineering
Plan and verify software releases with versioning, changelogs, release branches, feature flags, canaries, migration gates, rollback, deployment checks, and release readiness. Use when preparing a release, shipping a risky PR, coordinating app/backend/database rollout, recovering from a bad deploy, or defining release…
task-automation
Automate repetitive tasks and workflows using scripting, file watchers, scheduled jobs, CI triggers, and API polling to eliminate manual toil. Use when the user requests task automation or provides relevant inputs for this workflow.
context-optimizer
Analyze skill content for optimal placement (Skill vs Passive Context vs Hybrid), compress markdown to pipe-delimited format (60-80% token reduction), and validate compliance against the decision framework. Passive context wins for what the model cannot know (post-cutoff APIs, repo gotchas); pre-trained knowledge…
analysis-provenance
Identify code ownership before modifying validators or linters. Checks file headers for provenance indicators, reviews documentation, and determines provenance as UPSTREAM, LOCAL, VENDOR, or UNKNOWN. Prevents accidental modification of upstream tools.
panning-for-gold
Triage raw unstructured input (transcripts, brain dumps) into evaluated thread inventories and a synthesized gold-found file. Four phases: front-gate, extract, evaluate, synthesize. Use when you say "pan for gold", "triage transcript", "synthesize gold-found", or hand it a voice transcript or brain dump. Do NOT use…