What the reviewer found

Same Linux forensics/incident-response playbook as the RobotFlow-Labs copy: it collects /etc/shadow and history files from a mounted evidence image into a local case folder, not from a live target or sent outside. The destructive-looking commands are a detection wordlist grepped against shell history, not executed.

• dual-use — a security tool that can be misused
• example-or-fixture — an example or test fixture

What was read

The file as it ships in balsm-health/Balsm-AI:

• plugin/skills/analyzing-linux-system-artifacts/SKILL.md

What the static scan said

The scan flagged 4things. The reviewer kept 0 and dismissed 4 as false.

• PE2Asks for root — false positive
• PE3Reaches for credential files — false positive
• RMRecursive force delete — false positive
• NETMakes network calls — false positive

How this review was made

Sonnet 5 read the files above on 7 September 2026 and answered three questions: is it dangerous to whoever installs it, is each scanner finding real, and what should the installer know. The verdict is bound to the file's hash; when the file changes, it is scanned afresh and reviewed again. A script that changes while the definition does not is not re-reviewed — that is a known gap. How the scan and the review work.

Produced by agentmods.dev · Sonnet 5 · 7 September 2026