Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add balsm-health/Balsm-AI --skill exploiting-server-side-request-forgerygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/balsm-health/Balsm-AIWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/balsm-health/balsm-ai/exploiting-server-side-request-forgery)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/balsm-health/balsm-ai/exploiting-server-side-request-forgery"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/balsm-health/balsm-ai/exploiting-server-side-request-forgery/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/balsm-health/balsm-ai/exploiting-server-side-request-forgery"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/balsm-health/balsm-ai/exploiting-server-side-request-forgery.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00034 | $0.03578 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00017 | $0.01789 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00716 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00358 |
Grade B, and why
exploiting-server-side-request-forgery scanned grade B with 2 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Cloud metadata endpointmediumServer-side request forgery
One request to 169.254.169.254 can return temporary IAM credentials.
-d '{"url":"http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/"}' \ Downgraded: this mod is about security review, or the phrase is quoted, so it is likely naming the pattern rather than instructing it.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
- **curl**: For manual SSRF payload testing The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 355 lines · 34 tokens per session scan B 1121a34f7daf
exploiting-server-side-request-forgery is a skill published in the GitHub repository balsm-health/Balsm-AI (2 stars, last pushed 29d ago), with no licence file. It adds 34 tokens to every session and 3,578 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it B with 2 findings (cloud metadata endpoint, makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
testing-cors-misconfiguration
Identifying and exploiting Cross-Origin Resource Sharing misconfigurations that allow unauthorized cross-domain data access and credential theft during security assessments.
testing-for-business-logic-vulnerabilities
Identifying flaws in application business logic that allow price manipulation, workflow bypass, and privilege escalation beyond what technical vulnerability scanners can detect.
testing-for-xss-vulnerabilities-with-burpsuite
Identifying and validating cross-site scripting vulnerabilities using Burp Suite's scanner, intruder, and repeater tools during authorized security assessments.
testing-for-xxe-injection-vulnerabilities
Discovering and exploiting XML External Entity injection vulnerabilities to read server files, perform SSRF, and exfiltrate data during authorized penetration tests.
performing-jwt-none-algorithm-attack
Execute and test the JWT none algorithm attack to bypass signature verification by manipulating the alg header field in JSON Web Tokens.
Web Application Security Testing
OWASP Top 10 testing, injection vulnerability detection, API security assessment, authentication testing, and web vulnerability reporting for authorized assessments.