Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Bamzzo/project-analysis-skill --skill project-analysisgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Bamzzo/project-analysis-skillWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/bamzzo/project-analysis-skill/project-analysis)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bamzzo/project-analysis-skill/project-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bamzzo/project-analysis-skill/project-analysis/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bamzzo/project-analysis-skill/project-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bamzzo/project-analysis-skill/project-analysis.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00087 | $0.02293 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00035 | $0.00917 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00017 | $0.00459 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00229 |
Grade A, and why
project-analysis scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 177 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Project Analysis
Use this skill to turn an unfamiliar or messy project into a clear, actionable map. The goal is not only to summarize files, but to explain how the project works, where its core paths are, what can break, how to verify it, and what to do next.
Operating Principles
- Inspect before concluding. Distinguish code facts, documentation facts, runtime facts, inferences, and open questions.
- Prefer the project's real structure over generic architecture claims.
- Find the main path first: input -> dispatch -> core logic -> external dependency -> state/output.
- Keep uncertainty visible. Say "inferred from" when not verified by execution.
- Tie important conclusions to evidence: file paths, commands, test output, configs, or docs.
- Produce action-oriented output: what to read, run, test, fix, or avoid next.
- Do not expose secrets. If scanning configs, mention secret presence generically and avoid printing values.
- Avoid exhaustive file-by-file summaries. Explain the system by role, flow, boundary, and risk.
Choose Depth
If the user does not specify depth, use standard.
For very large repositories, start with the surface map even when the requested depth is deep or audit.
| Depth | Inspect | Execute | Output emphasis | Required evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| quick | top-level docs, manifests, scripts, major directories | read-only discovery only | what it is, likely stack, key files, obvious risks, next commands | files/commands inspected and major unknowns |
| standard | docs, manifests, configs, entrypoints, core modules, tests/CI | safe read-only commands; run lightweight verification only when clearly appropriate | architecture map, startup path, main flow, verification path, next actions | file paths for main claims and commands actually run |
| deep | standard scope plus 1-3 traced high-value flows and relevant tests/contracts | targeted tests/build/typecheck or dry runs when safe | flow traces, state/contracts, failure modes, missing coverage | file/line evidence for traced paths and verification limits |
| audit | broad risk surface: config, auth, state, side effects, CI/CD, dependencies, tests | validation, dry-run, read-only, or explicitly safe commands only | evidence ledger, risk register, readiness judgment, prioritized remediation | evidence for every major risk or explicit "Open" label |
What ships with it
13 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- agents/openai.yaml 301 B
- references/agent-projects.md 2.7 KB
- references/analysis-checklists.md 4.7 KB
- references/data-ml-projects.md 2.5 KB
- references/database-projects.md 3.2 KB
- references/debugging-projects.md 2.3 KB
- references/infra-projects.md 2.4 KB
- references/library-cli-projects.md 2.4 KB
- references/mobile-desktop-projects.md 3.2 KB
- references/monorepos.md 2.4 KB
- references/output-templates.md 4.6 KB
- references/security-audit-projects.md 3.3 KB
- references/web-projects.md 1.9 KB
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 177 lines · 87 tokens per session scan A beb69e71f971
project-analysis is a skill published in the GitHub repository Bamzzo/project-analysis-skill (31 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 87 tokens to every session and 2,293 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
project-analysis compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| project-analysisBamzzo/project-analysis-skill | Skill | 31 | 5mo ago | MIT | A | 87 | Codex |
| imagegenopenai/codex | Skill | 135k | today | Apache-2.0 | A | 113 | Codex |
| playwright-climicrosoft/playwright | Skill | 100k | today | Apache-2.0 | A | 19 | Claude Code |
| browser-automationopenclaw/openclaw | Skill | 394k | today | MIT | A | 36 | Claude Code |
| local-ai-agentsmicrosoft/ai-agents-for-beginners | Skill | 79k | 5d ago | MIT | A | 200 | Claude Code, Codex |
| next-cache-components-adoptionvercel/next.js | Skill | 143k | today | MIT | A | 95 | Claude Code |
| systematic-debuggingobra/superpowers | Skill | 316k | 8d ago | MIT | A | 21 | Claude Code |