requirements-to-task-packet

requirements-to-task-packet is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from baphuongna/pi-crew. It costs 28 tokens per session (920 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A method for turning a broad request or problem into clear task instructions for individual workers.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to break goals, issues, roadmap items, review findings, or user requests into actionable implementation tasks.
Why use it?
It removes ambiguity by defining scope, assumptions, risks, acceptance criteria, and when to ask for clarification.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one. Also seen: mentions subagents.

Good fit Use it to break goals, issues, roadmap items, review findings, or user requests into actionable implementation tasks.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/baphuongna/pi-crew/requirements-to-task-packet
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add baphuongna/pi-crew --skill requirements-to-task-packet
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/baphuongna/pi-crew

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for requirements-to-task-packet

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/baphuongna/pi-crew/requirements-to-task-packet/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/baphuongna/pi-crew/requirements-to-task-packet)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/baphuongna/pi-crew/requirements-to-task-packet"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/baphuongna/pi-crew/requirements-to-task-packet/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for requirements-to-task-packet

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/baphuongna/pi-crew/requirements-to-task-packet"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/baphuongna/pi-crew/requirements-to-task-packet.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 28 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 920 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00028 $0.00920
Opus 5 $0.00014 $0.00460
Sonnet 5 $0.00006 $0.00184
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00092

Measured 11d ago against content hash a329021658ce, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-10, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

requirements-to-task-packet scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/requirements-to-task-packet/SKILL.md · 111 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 111 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

requirements-to-task-packet

Core principle: workers need explicit task packets, not inherited ambiguity. Ask only when ambiguity changes architecture, safety, public behavior, or data loss risk; otherwise record assumptions.

Distilled from detailed reads of clarification, spec-to-implementation, subagent-driven development, and skill-authoring patterns.

Clarify or Proceed

Ask before implementation when ambiguity affects:

  • security boundary, permissions, ownership, or secret handling;
  • destructive operations, migrations, publishing, or public API behavior;
  • architecture or data model;
  • acceptance criteria or rollback expectations.

Proceed with explicit assumptions when ambiguity is local, reversible, and testable.

Task Packet Template

Objective:
Scope/paths:
Allowed edits:
Forbidden edits/non-goals:
Inputs/dependencies:
Relevant context/artifacts:
Assumptions:
Risks:
Acceptance criteria:
Verification commands:
Expected output artifacts:
Escalation conditions:

Subagent Context Rules

  • Give each worker fresh, curated context; do not rely on hidden parent history.
  • Include exact upstream artifact paths and summaries when needed.
  • Keep implementation tasks independent or explicitly sequenced.
  • Require workers to report one of: DONE, DONE_WITH_CONCERNS, NEEDS_CONTEXT, BLOCKED.
  • For BLOCKED/NEEDS_CONTEXT, change context/model/scope before retrying.

Acceptance Criteria

Use observable checks:

  • command output, state transition, UI/status text, artifact contents;
  • regression tests or named test files;
  • security properties such as containment/ownership/no secrets;
  • compatibility requirements such as Windows paths or Pi CLI flags;
  • rollback notes.

Spec Pairs (pi-crew v0.10.1+, ADR-6)

When the target runs pi-crew, author the SpecRecord + TaskPacket pair instead of prose-only acceptance:

  1. SpecRecord (workspace state/specs/<id>.json): requirements[] with must|should|could priority + stable ids; acceptance[] entries each tied to a requirementId. Machine-checkable acceptances carry command, expectedDigest (sha-256 hex of stdout) or expectedExitCode, and idempotent: true — only idempotent commands are ever re-run.
  2. PROVENANCE — critical: specs you (an agent/skill path) write are persisted generated and NEVER re-executed by the orchestrator. manual+trusted (the only specs strict mode re-runs) are minted exclusively by USER-facing import actions — a worker cannot author a command the root re-executes.
  3. Wire the workflow: add specRefs: [<spec ids>] to steps held to the spec; specStrict: true in frontmatter opts the whole workflow into strict mode (requires a verifier role step — the run rejects at start otherwise).
  4. Executor footer contract: workers must END results with

Read the full file on GitHub · 111 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 11d ago First seen · 111 lines · 28 tokens per session scan A a329021658ce

Subscribe to this mod's changes

requirements-to-task-packet is a skill published in the GitHub repository baphuongna/pi-crew (52 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 28 tokens to every session and 920 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories