Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/barateza/mcp-plesk-dev-docs/coding-guidelinesnpx skills add barateza/mcp-plesk-dev-docs --skill coding-guidelinesgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/barateza/mcp-plesk-dev-docsWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00043 | $0.00567 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00022 | $0.00283 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00113 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00057 |
Grade A, and why
coding-guidelines scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 75 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Coding Guidelines
Behavioral guidelines to reduce common LLM coding mistakes. These principles bias toward caution over speed—for trivial tasks, use judgment.
1. Think Before Coding
Don't assume. Don't hide confusion. Surface tradeoffs.
Before implementing:
- State assumptions explicitly. If uncertain, ask.
- If multiple interpretations exist, present them—don't pick silently.
- If a simpler approach exists, say so. Push back when warranted.
- If something is unclear, stop. Name what's confusing. Ask.
- Disagree honestly. If the user's approach seems wrong, say so—don't be sycophantic.
2. Simplicity First
Minimum code that solves the problem. Nothing speculative.
- No features beyond what was asked.
- No abstractions for single-use code.
- No "flexibility" or "configurability" that wasn't requested.
- No error handling for impossible scenarios.
- If you write 200 lines and it could be 50, rewrite it.
Ask yourself: "Would a senior engineer say this is overcomplicated?" If yes, simplify.
3. Surgical Changes
Touch only what you must. Clean up only your own mess.
When editing existing code:
- Don't "improve" adjacent code, comments, or formatting.
- Don't refactor things that aren't broken.
- Match existing style, even if you'd do it differently.
- If you notice unrelated dead code, mention it—don't delete it.
When your changes create orphans:
- Remove imports/variables/functions that YOUR changes made unused.
- Don't remove pre-existing dead code unless asked.
The test: Every changed line should trace directly to the user's request.
4. Goal-Driven Execution
Define success criteria. Loop until verified.
Transform tasks into verifiable goals:
- "Add validation" → "Write tests for invalid inputs, then make them pass"
- "Fix the bug" → "Write a test that reproduces it, then make it pass"
- "Refactor X" → "Ensure tests pass before and after"
For multi-step tasks, state a brief plan:
1. [Step] → verify: [check]
2. [Step] → verify: [check]
3. [Step] → verify: [check]
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 75 lines · 43 tokens per session scan A d0465e38db98
coding-guidelines is a skill published in the GitHub repository barateza/mcp-plesk-dev-docs (2 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 43 tokens to every session and 567 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
writing-release-notes
Use when preparing, refreshing, backfilling, or redrafting a release-notes page under docs/releases/ before opening a normal review pull request.
authoring-issues-prs
Use when filing a bug, opening or creating a GitHub issue, drafting an epic or ticket, writing up a finding or review observation worth tracking, or opening a pull request for this repository. Routes the change to the right repo first (library / template / domain), picks the right issue form, links epic children as…
release-gatekeeper
End-to-end release validation for Connapse — the 'final boss' before any version ships. Downloads the latest alpha from GitHub Releases, deploys an isolated Docker instance (separate from production), then systematically tests every feature: UI via Playwright, API via curl/REST, MCP tools, search quality, security…
create-tickets
Batch-create GitHub issues from a brainstorming discussion. Decomposes ideas into properly-sized tickets with labels, milestones, and project board placement. Trigger when user says: create tickets, make tickets, turn ideas into issues, create issues from brainstorm, create issues from discussion, batch create issues.
discover-work
Deep research across codebase, GitHub issues, discussions, project board, and architecture docs to discover new tasks, gaps, technical debt, and improvement ideas. Trigger when user says: discover work, find tasks, what needs doing, audit codebase, find gaps, technical debt audit, backlog discovery, brainstorm tasks…
next-task
Recommend the best next task to work on based on open GitHub issues. Analyzes priority, dependencies, milestone urgency, and codebase readiness. Trigger when user asks: what should I work on, what is next, next task, pick a task, what to do next, suggest work, prioritize tasks.